[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2010-09-20 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-20 22:04 --- No feedback. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2008-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 21:33 --- I think the issue was info/.texi files were not generated in that package. Does this work in a newer release of GCC? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-10-30 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
--- Comment #9 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 2006-10-30 11:38 --- Sorry it took me so long, but I had clobbered my objects (...), and then I tried to post it, but somehow it doesn't show: sorry if comes twice... I would guess it's not obviously wrong

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-10-27 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
--- Comment #7 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 2006-10-27 07:03 --- Here's what I get: makeinfo -v --split-size=500 --split-size=500 --split-size=500 -I /USER/philippe/Irix/Gcc_Sources/gcc/doc/include -I /USER/philippe/Irix/Gcc_Sources/gcc/fortran

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-10-27 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-27 08:58 --- I forgot the texi file.. makeinfo -v --split-size=500 --split-size=500 --split-size=500 -I /USER/philippe/Irix/Gcc_Sources/gcc/doc/include -I /USER/philippe/Irix/Gcc_Sources/gcc/fortran -o

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-10-26 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
--- Comment #4 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 2006-10-26 06:37 --- I am experiecing the same thing under Irix with freshly checked out sources. The system: SGI, IRIX64 blue1 6.5 04100802 IP27. All the tools are quite out of date... PS: is this related to

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-10-26 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-26 11:18 --- pr27516 is different in that pr27516 calls makeinfo even if there was no makeinfo detected. PPS: For me it fails with [] makeinfo: getwd: doc/gfortran.info, make[3]: *** [doc/gfortran.info] Error 1 make[3]:

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-10-26 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de
--- Comment #6 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 2006-10-26 12:02 --- Sure! It will just take some time, as I've cleaned-up my objects in between (I was getting reading to give it another go with an up-to-date TexInfo...). I hope to be able to post that in a few

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-04-13 Thread jkanze at cheuvreux dot com
--- Comment #3 from jkanze at cheuvreux dot com 2006-04-13 16:28 --- (In reply to comment #1) Are you building from a release version, correct? As far as I know. It's version 4.1.0, downloaded yesterday or the day before. How can I tell? (I do want something more or less stable,

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-04-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 18:18 --- Are you building from a release version, correct? Otherwise you do need makeinfo as explained by: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27133

[Bug bootstrap/27133] Fails to build because of funny version of makeinfo

2006-04-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 01:41 --- Can you show how it fails also because this is not enough information really. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27133