--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 20:24 ---
Or is it? This comes down to fundamental types having what namespace.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43261
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 20:28 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29131 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from boostcpp at gmail dot com 2010-03-05 00:55 ---
Thank you. Now I understand the real problem.
But still, it's nasty.
I wonder C++0x fix this issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43261
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-05 00:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thank you. Now I understand the real problem.
But still, it's nasty.
I wonder C++0x fix this issue.
Considering the defect report against the C++ standard is still on the active
list, I
