https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66220
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 2 18:45:50 2015
New Revision: 224041
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224041root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/66220: Fix false positive from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66220
David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66220
--- Comment #4 from Franz Sirl sirl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch from #c3 works fine for our codebase, I couldn't spot any false positives
anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66220
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66220
David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66220
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks.
I ran into a variant of this whilst testing -Wmisleading-indentation on the
linux kernel, where a preprocessor macro conditionalizes the if/else; here's
the test case I
