https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12463f1ecbcb30b39b8212454a6e598645123305
commit r12-7456-g12463f1ecbcb30b39b8212454a6e598645123305
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch in comment#2 regtests ok.
I've been thinking a little to find cases where there should be a difference
to the patch in comment#1, but did not succeed so far. At least not with
minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:32:25PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
>
> --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Steve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3)
> I'm not sure. I don't use CLASSes, so only know a bit
> about them. If I check F18:7.5.6, I find
>
> C786 (R753) A final-subroutine-name shall be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:10:34PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I was wondering if we also need to allow BT_CLASS.
I'm not sure. I don't use CLASSes, so only know a bit
about them. If I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Ever confirmed|0
