--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-01 16:24
---
Subject: Bug 31207
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 1 16:23:48 2007
New Revision: 123401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123401
Log:
2007-04-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-01 16:29
---
Subject: Bug 31207
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 1 16:29:05 2007
New Revision: 123402
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123402
Log:
2007-04-01 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-01 05:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31207
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg1.html
--
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 01:00
---
Turns out this is not a duplicate of 31199. However its is closel related. I
wll work this one as well.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 15:36 ---
Confirmed.
Reduced test case:
$ cat rewind-2.f90
program main
write (*,'(A,T1,A)',advance=no) 'XX','ABC'
end program main
$ gfortran rewind-2.f90
$ ./a.out
ABC$
Jerry, I'm putting you on the CC list for
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 15:59
---
I have started looking at this. I believe its a duplicate of 31199. In using
advance=no we are failing to retain or use the information about the maximum
position reached during preceding writes.
*** This bug
