--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:06 ---
*** Bug 31921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-08 13:45 ---
Subject: Bug 31692
Author: pault
Date: Tue May 8 12:45:31 2007
New Revision: 124546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124546
Log:
2007-05-08 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-08 13:49 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-04 07:29 ---
This fixes it but needs some cleaning up:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 124354)
---
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-05 01:06 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31692
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00246.html
--
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-27 23:52 ---
trans-expr.c's gfc_conv_variable contains:
/* Special case for assigning the return value of a function.
Self recursive functions must have an explicit return value. */
if (return_value
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 07:38 ---
foo1 (__result, n)
{
bar1 ((int4 *) n, foo1);
goto __return_foo1;
__return_foo1:;
looks strange. Shouldn't this be:
bar1 ((int4 *) n, __result)
In addition, the warning
g.f90:8: warning: Function does not
