[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-03 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 11:33:43 UTC --- Summary as far I understand it. Cf. http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-September/003852.html : module m procedure(), pointer :: p, p2 protected :: p

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 14:19:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Note: The problem not only applies to procedure pointers, but also to data pointers, as the following example shows: Well, at least this example

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-10-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 19:52:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Ok, I think the only way this half-sentence and the interpretation on the J3 mailing list make sense, is via the following

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:47 --- TODO: Check whether the code is really invalid - C551 talks only about nonpointers, but it also talks about proc-target - which only applies to procedures and the PROTECTED only applies per C549 to variables and

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:19 --- (In reply to comment #1) TODO: Check whether the code is really invalid I have now asked at J3, cf. http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-September/thread.html --