subject:"\[Bug fortran\/68289\] Missing diagnostic pragmas"

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

2021-04-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

2018-02-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

2018-02-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- From pr64273: Tobias Burnus 2014-12-11 16:29:56 UTC Follow up to PR44054 and PR53552. See also related bugs PR28662, PR62226, PR53934. There are two possibilities, either to use a real #pragma wa

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

2018-02-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

2018-02-18 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

2016-02-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to pr64273.

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

2015-11-11 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #4 from Manuel

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

2015-11-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > IMO implementing the diagnostic pragmas in gfortran will just be a waste of > > time. Thus if someone want to close this PR as WONTFIX, I won't object! > > Why? Doesn't Fortran have pragmas? Yes i