[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2024-03-09 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- While this issue seems fixed(?), there's now a new one with the same symptom, not sure if we should dup and keep this one open?

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab8fed849ab345974e5b83472749ac1393878f71 commit r13-7709-gab8fed849ab345974e5b83472749ac1393878f71 Author: Thomas Neumann

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c46bded78f3733ad1312d141ebf1ae541032a48b commit r14-3154-gc46bded78f3733ad1312d141ebf1ae541032a48b Author: Thomas Neumann Date: Fri

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-10 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- [...] > I'm currently running a full i386-pc-solaris2.11 bootstrap. ... which just completed without

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-10 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #8 from Thomas Neumann --- > Created attachment 55715 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55715=edit > patch to use the correct base pointer > > The

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-10 Thread tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Neumann --- Created attachment 55715 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55715=edit patch to use the correct base pointer The attached patch fixes the test case by using the correct base pointer

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-09 Thread tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Neumann --- Thanks for the pointer, I could reproduce the problem in a VM now. That shared library uses an usual table encoding that has to reference the original base pointer within get_pc_range. But when

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-09 Thread ro at manam dot mail-host-address-is-not-set via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #6 from ro at manam dot mail-host-address-is-not-set --- > --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth --- > (In reply to Thomas Neumann from comment #1) >> The assert says that the code tries to de-register a frame that it did not >> register

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-09 Thread tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Neumann --- The assert itself is old, it was just updated due to code changes. And asserting there makes sense, if we keep an old frame around we might see a crash later during unwinding if the unwinder tries to

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Thomas Neumann from comment #1) > The assert says that the code tries to de-register a frame that it did not > register before or that was deregistered before. Did we assert for these cases

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13, 14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcc/110956] [13, 14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library

2023-08-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.3 Summary|gcc_assert is