--- Comment #8 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-07-24 05:45 ---
Is this a problem with mainline? It has 4.2 regression marked on it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 05:51 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Is this a problem with mainline? It has 4.2 regression marked on it.
Why do you think otherwise, the commits were all to a developmental branch and
the patch is up on the patch queue so why
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:33
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 15:19 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Mark, why isn't this marked as a regression?
Most likey because I and others did not notice it was a regression and could
not tell from either the patch or the bug report it was.
--
