[Bug middle-end/26679] [4.2 Regression] boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c

2006-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 13:13 --- Fixed by: 2006-03-14 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure: Regenerate with autoconf 2.13. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/26679] [4.2 Regression] boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c

2006-03-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |middle-end Keywords||build

[Bug middle-end/26679] [4.2 Regression] boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c

2006-03-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 15:27 --- Actually can you try it again after: 2006-03-14 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure: Regenerate with autoconf 2.13. I think the toplevel configure was exposing this. -- pinskia at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/26679] [4.2 Regression] boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c

2006-03-14 Thread graham dot stott at btinternet dot com
--- Comment #6 from graham dot stott at btinternet dot com 2006-03-14 18:55 --- Subject: Re: boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c All, If the warning isn't bogus then we probably need to do the shift in two steps (i.e. hwi = (hwi (shift - 1)) 1) as done elsewhere to

[Bug middle-end/26679] [4.2 Regression] boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c

2006-03-14 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 18:57 --- Subject: Re: boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Graham Stott wrote: All, If the warning isn't bogus then we probably need to do the shift in two steps (i.e. hwi =