[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-08-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-08-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 30 12:08:04 2019 New Revision: 275117 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275117=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-05-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 --- Comment #13 from Jakub

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-04-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:29:44 2019 New Revision: 270713 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270713=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-04-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Well, for the decode_field_reference, I think it is essential not to change > *exp_ if returning NULL, because the caller uses lr_arg/rr_arg without > checking

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 9+ so far.

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 20 23:01:41 2019 New Revision: 269056 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269056=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/89091 * fold-const.c (decode_field_reference): Return

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Comment on attachment 45774 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45774 Patch Well, for the decode_field_reference, I think it is essential not to change *exp_ if returning NULL, because the

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-20 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 45774 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45774=edit Patch I came up with this patch; it survives bootstrap, but am not sure if it's correct.

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-20 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-20 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #3) > for gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr89037.c, valgrind says: That's where I've minimized my testcase from.

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-20 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- for gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr89037.c, valgrind says: ./gcc.dg/pr89037.c:9:9: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] 9 | T a[] = { 1, 1, 0x12345, 0xff01, 1ULL << 63,

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-02-17 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Any update on this David?

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-01-28 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

2019-01-28 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|