https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
HaoChen Gui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae226cb1ee17d61c416c9d4d8c5a142788b8afff
commit r14-6392-gae226cb1ee17d61c416c9d4d8c5a142788b8afff
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46e342b985e6b4058db73875103cced2666e84e2
commit r14-6391-g46e342b985e6b4058db73875103cced2666e84e2
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #12)
> > I'll note that you don't always
> > get an assembler error, since gcc still passes -many to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #12)
> I'll note that you don't always
> get an assembler error, since gcc still passes -many to the assembler for
> non --enable-checking gcc builds, which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #10)
> (In reply to HaoChen Gui from comment #9)
>
>> My question is: can "fctid" be executed on powerpc7450 such a 32bit
>> processor? If it's supported, should the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to HaoChen Gui from comment #9)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> > Yeah, it tested for ISA 2.04 before. That was an attempt at including 476
> > probably?
> >
> > We really
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #9 from HaoChen Gui ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> Yeah, it tested for ISA 2.04 before. That was an attempt at including 476
> probably?
>
> We really should have a TARGET_FCTID, on for TARGET_POWERPC64 or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Fore ---
Created attachment 56691
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56691=edit
build log of the original compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Fore ---
The original example in the wild was with -mcpu=7450 -O2 -maltivec
-mabi=altivec -pipe, plus the flags the build system added, then I minimised it
to the attachment above, where I only needed: -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Fore ---
It's a PowerPC 7447A and the assembler version is:
GNU assembler version 2.40.0 (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) using BFD version
(Gentoo 2.40 p5) 2.40.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
HaoChen Gui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Fore ---
Created attachment 56684
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56684=edit
assembly output of sharedbook.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112707
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Fore ---
Created attachment 56683
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56683=edit
trimmed file with cvise
17 matches
Mail list logo
