http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #21 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28 11:07:02
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Mar 28 11:06:58 2011
New Revision: 171598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171598
Log:
PR target/48245
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 11:11:09 UTC ---
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-03-24 18:46:41 UTC ---
AFAICT, comment #12 is OK
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28
11:18:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
given that Mike has approved,
if someone could chip in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 11:21:20 UTC ---
supposed to test? pr46940_0.c fails because only weak aliases are supported
on darwin and the other tests pass even without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-24 12:40:52
UTC ---
AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
given that Mike has approved,
if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64-darwin10,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-03-24 18:46:41 UTC ---
AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
given that Mike has approved,
if someone could chip in with a test on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 10:58:36 UTC ---
Before revision 171039 the test was unsupported:
UNSUPPORTED: /opt/gcc/p_work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr46940_0.c
because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-03-23
14:56:37 UTC ---
Which linker do you use, and what's the value of HAVE_LTO_PLUGIN in
gcc/auto-host.h? Could you check the gcc/config.log snippet for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 15:05:17 UTC ---
The linker is
@(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-97.17
llvm version 2.9svn, from Apple Clang 1.7 (build 77)
on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-03-23
15:28:31 UTC ---
What happens if you try to compile and link the test program from
check_linker_plugin_available with the new gcc?
$ cd gcc
$ cat lpl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 15:38:08 UTC ---
I see what's going on now: Darwin (in gcc/config/darwin.h) is one of
only two targets (besides i386/djgpp.h) that override
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-03-23
17:08:59 UTC ---
With the change in comment #5, bootstrapping fails with
ld: file not found: LINK_PLUGIN_SPEC
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[5]: ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 17:10:38 UTC ---
maybe this is getting complex enough to warrant a spec of its own? (and then
we
could avoid cloning it)
Why would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 17:15:46 UTC ---
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-03-23 17:08:59 UTC ---
With the change in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23 17:20:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
maybe this is getting complex enough to warrant a spec of its own? (and
then we
could avoid cloning it)
The fact that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23 17:38:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-03-23 17:08:59 UTC ---
With the change in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 17:49:55 UTC ---
au contraire, I think Rainer is right... ;) ... Iain did not engage brain
sufficiently...
Me neither ;-)
but one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23
18:01:03 UTC ---
If you guys like the patch from #12, I'll approve it... Looks reasonable to
me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23 18:27:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
If you guys like the patch from #12, I'll approve it... Looks reasonable to
me.
it seems to the the Right Thing on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 18:41:57 UTC ---
it seems to the the Right Thing on *-darwin9 (cross-to-cris-elf will take
longer).
Executing on host:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23 18:46:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
it seems to the the Right Thing on *-darwin9 (cross-to-cris-elf will take
longer).
Executing on host:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-23 18:52:16 UTC ---
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23
18:46:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
it
25 matches
Mail list logo
