--- Comment #5 from kloedej at knmi dot nl 2006-11-24 08:12 ---
Yes, I can confirm the gfortran version used was 4.3.0.
I didn't notice the version number changed when I downoaded the latest version.
Sorry for that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29951
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 08:13 ---
Mine to fix then.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On ultrasparc hardware Linux/Solaris gcc 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.1.1 and
4.1.2-prerelease have a bug:
#include stdio.h
int testdiv(int i, int k) {
if (k == 0) printf(found divide by zero\n);
return(i/k);
}
int main() {
int i = testdiv(1,0);
return(i);
}
When compile it
--- Comment #1 from tiamat at komi dot mts dot ru 2006-11-24 10:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12681)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12681action=view)
preprocessed file test.i
$ gcc -v -save-temps -O3 test.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
Configured
--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-11-24 10:34 ---
Your program is invoking undefined behaviour. You should not perform the
division if the divisor is zero.
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 10:46 ---
3.4.6 and 3.3.6 have the same issue
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
In integer-dominated code, it is often useful to use floating point
registers to do block copies. If suitable alignment is available,
64 bit loads / stores allow to do the copy with half as many memory
operations. If the source is loop invariant, the loads can be
hoisted out of the loop;
testcase 1:
int foo(int n) // should not ICE
{
return ({struct {int x[n];} x; x.x[12] = 1; x;}).x[12];
}
internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:708
testcase 2:
int foo(void) // should not ICE
{
return sizeof({int n = 20; struct {int x[n];} x; x.x[12] = 1;
in theory the anonymous namespace is a `static' keyword superior.
in fact it breaks applications that use dlopen() with RTLD_GLOBAL.
the so called superior emits symbols with different binding.
e.g.:
static keyword:
4 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 4 N::a_
namespace superior:
4
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-11-24 13:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=12682)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12682action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29971
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-11-24 13:56 ---
Subject: Re: New: mixing ({...}) with VLA leads to massive
breakage
This looks much the same as bug 27301, though the additional testcases are
useful.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29970
Hi,
I hope that this is the right mailing list to report this to. While reading
through the GCC Internals Manual, I have found a mix-up in the chapter
11.7 Constant expressions. The description of the expression
(const_vector:m [x0 x1 ...]) contains text belonging to the description of
the
--- Comment #2 from aviro at redhat dot com 2006-11-24 15:25 ---
27301 looks similar to what the first one trips, but passing pointers
as suggested by #3 there is not a panacea - testcases 4 and 5
actually deal with that variant. It really looks as if part (but not
all) information
Updated patch of http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00236.html
with some en_us/en_uk differences dropped, and a couple of new typos.
--
Summary: typos in the manual
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
--- Comment #1 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2006-11-24 16:17
---
Created an attachment (id=12683)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12683action=view)
typos (against trunk)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
--- Comment #5 from carlos at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 16:33 ---
Subject: Bug 27073
Author: carlos
Date: Fri Nov 24 16:33:44 2006
New Revision: 119160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119160
Log:
2006-11-24 Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 18:32 ---
Subject: Bug 29964
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Nov 24 18:32:14 2006
New Revision: 119162
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119162
Log:
2006-11-24 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 18:34 ---
Fixed on the mainline will test and commit to the 4.1 and 4.2 branches later
this holiday weekend.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 21:23 ---
Subject: Bug 29736
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 24 21:23:23 2006
New Revision: 119165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119165
Log:
PR c/29736
* c-common.c
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 21:24 ---
Subject: Bug 29736
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 24 21:24:34 2006
New Revision: 119166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119166
Log:
PR c/29736
* c-common.c
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 21:26 ---
Subject: Bug 29736
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 24 21:26:44 2006
New Revision: 119167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119167
Log:
PR c/29736
* c-common.c
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 21:28 ---
Subject: Bug 29955
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 24 21:28:38 2006
New Revision: 119168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119168
Log:
PR c/29955
* c-tree.h (c_maybe_initialize_eh): New
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 21:29 ---
Subject: Bug 29955
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 24 21:29:13 2006
New Revision: 119169
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119169
Log:
PR c/29955
* c-tree.h (c_maybe_initialize_eh): New
When I implemented my intrinsics as actual arguments patch, I had an old
version of the F2003 standard draft. I commited a fix for that problem on
mainline as rev. 119170
--
Summary: [4.2 only] CHAR not allowed as actual argument, even in
F2003
Product:
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-11-24 21:49:05
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-11-24 22:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29166
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01681.html
--
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:22 ---
Subject: Bug 20880
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 24 22:22:40 2006
New Revision: 119173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119173
Log:
2006-11-24 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:22 ---
Subject: Bug 29387
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 24 22:22:40 2006
New Revision: 119173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119173
Log:
2006-11-24 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:25
---
Subject: Bug 29489
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Nov 24 22:25:34 2006
New Revision: 119174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119174
Log:
PR fortran/29391
PR fortran/29489
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:25
---
Subject: Bug 24285
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Nov 24 22:25:34 2006
New Revision: 119174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119174
Log:
PR fortran/29391
PR fortran/29489
--- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:25
---
Subject: Bug 29391
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Nov 24 22:25:34 2006
New Revision: 119174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119174
Log:
PR fortran/29391
PR fortran/29489
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:27
---
Fixed on 4.2 also.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
|
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:45
---
Subject: Bug 29489
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Nov 24 22:45:21 2006
New Revision: 119175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119175
Log:
PR fortran/29391
PR fortran/29489
--- Comment #17 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:45
---
Subject: Bug 29391
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Nov 24 22:45:21 2006
New Revision: 119175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119175
Log:
PR fortran/29391
PR fortran/29489
--- Comment #18 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:46
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:46
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:46 ---
Here is the patch which I am testing, it fixes this testcase;
Index: trans-intrinsic.c
===
--- trans-intrinsic.c (revision 119148)
+++
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 22:48 ---
It turns out my fix caused PR 29951 which I am testing a fix for PR 29951 now.
My new patch does not break this testcase which is a good sign.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 01:37 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 01:43 ---
Fixed in 4.2.0 by the patch which fixed PR 21581 and PR 25915.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 01:55 ---
testcase 2 and 3 are a front-end issue as far as I can tell:
in .orginal:
int n = 0; // not there for 2 which causes the ICE
return (int) ((long unsigned int) SAVE_EXPR n * 4);
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 02:01 ---
-These nodes represent logical and and logical or, respectively. These
+These nodes represent logical and @w{}and logical or, respectively. These
Maybe this should be :
These nodes represent logical @code{and}
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 02:08 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 02:09 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 02:27 ---
First -mcpu=505 is incorrect for the e500 series, the PPC505 is different from
the 8540 which is the e500 series. So this is just a matter of having bad
options as far as I can tell.
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 02:33
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 02:33 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
To be connected to Bug 29825.
No that is unrelated.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 02:37 ---
This is related to PR 27924 and I bet really a dup.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 02:38 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 03:08 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 03:13 ---
Reducing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC build
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 03:14
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-11-25
04:12 ---
Are there any plans to backport this fix to the gcc 4.2 branch since it does
fix a pretty nasty performace hit?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28974
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 04:13 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29826 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 04:13 ---
*** Bug 27924 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 04:27 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29016 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 04:27
---
*** Bug 29658 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 04:31 ---
This is a dup of bug 29518 after all as it has been fixed on the mainline.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29518 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 04:31
---
*** Bug 29701 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Segmentation fault on simple input file.
OS: Windows XP x64 running cygwin.
The error does not occur if the last member of the class (the vectorint) is
removed or replaced with an int. Neither does it occur when the #include
string line is removed.
--
Summary: Segmentation fault on
--- Comment #1 from jfhamlin at gmail dot com 2006-11-25 05:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=12684)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12684action=view)
.ii file causing error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29974
--- Comment #2 from jfhamlin at gmail dot com 2006-11-25 05:35 ---
gcc stderr/stdout output:
$ g++ -v testFail.h
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/specs
Configured with: /gcc/gcc-3.4.4/gcc-3.4.4-1/configure --verbose --prefix=/usr
--exec-prefix=/
usr
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 07:13
---
Subject: Bug 29936
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 25 07:12:56 2006
New Revision: 119184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119184
Log:
2006-11-24 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 07:14
---
Subject: Bug 29936
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 25 07:14:33 2006
New Revision: 119185
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119185
Log:
2006-11-24 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 07:23
---
Subject: Bug 29936
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 25 07:22:49 2006
New Revision: 119186
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119186
Log:
2006-11-24 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 07:24
---
Subject: Bug 29936
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 25 07:24:34 2006
New Revision: 119187
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119187
Log:
2006-11-24 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 07:28
---
Fixed on 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29936
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 07:29
---
Fixed
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
71 matches
Mail list logo
