[Bug target/51251] SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 08:07:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Hmmm... because of the way the test is compiled and the target flags are added, there is ... -mcpu=ultrasparc -mvis and then

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 --- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 08:08:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) Patch also break mips-linux-gnu. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02004.html I applied this on top of

[Bug c++/51257] New: Template changes scope of friend functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51257 Bug #: 51257 Summary: Template changes scope of friend functions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug due to implicit_pure?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 08:41:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Tobias, Why did you mark this PR with the wrong-code keyword? Because it generates wrong-code and I wasn't completely convinced

[Bug target/49313] Inefficient libgcc implementations for avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 08:56:51 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Nov 21 08:56:44 2011 New Revision: 181551 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181551 Log: PR target/49313 *

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #58 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 09:04:14 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Mon Nov 21 09:04:08 2011 New Revision: 181553 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181553 Log: gcc/ada: Backport from

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING ---

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #41 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-11-21 09:25:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) The first 4.6.1 bootstrap attempt failed at the very first Ada compilation step in stage 3, with a SEGV in gnat1 when compiling

[Bug objc++/51159] build failure with --enable-build-with-cxx in gcc-4.6.2/gcc/objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51159 --- Comment #5 from sebastian.heg...@tu-dresden.de 2011-11-21 09:43:23 UTC --- Any chance of seeing the fix backported to 4.6, though?

[Bug middle-end/51144] r181279 possibly miscompilation of genmddeps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 10:10:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) PR middle-end/51144 * output.h (fprint_w): Remove. * final.c (fprint_w): Remove. (output_addr_const): Change

[Bug libstdc++/51185] [C++0x] false-positive results of std::is_constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51185 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 11:21:20 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Nov 21 11:21:13 2011 New Revision: 181557 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181557 Log: 2011-11-21

[Bug libstdc++/51185] [C++0x] false-positive results of std::is_constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51185 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/51251] SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/51251] SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 --- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 12:21:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Hmmm... because of the way the test is compiled and the target flags are added, there is ... -mcpu=ultrasparc -mvis and then

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25473|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/51251] conflicting -mcpu switches during testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |testsuite

[Bug other/51125] FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125 --- Comment #6 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 13:28:08 UTC --- Yes, the patch submission to the mailing list was incorrect and contained a non-intended change. The patch as committed and ChangeLogged is correct. Aldy: yes,

[Bug c/48023] [trans-mem] no-builtin flag and TM builtin like memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48023 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/50074] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c execution test on x86_64 with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 13:31:16 UTC --- This fixes the testcase on s390x. Tested with r181554. Thanks!

[Bug c++/51231] g++ remove placement new with -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Evgeniy Dushistov dushistov at mail dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.5

[Bug testsuite/51251] conflicting -mcpu switches during testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 --- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 14:06:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) The issue is that when running on real hardware, you can't use arbitrary cpu flags and expect it to work. And it is wrong to say

[Bug c++/50852] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11030

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852 --- Comment #3 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-11-21 14:43:25 UTC --- A candidate patch was sent to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01859.html for this.

[Bug libgomp/51249] semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/51143] [C++11][DR 1159] Alias template allows class definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51143 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/50802] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 --- Comment #18 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-21 14:59:53 UTC --- On 11/18/2011 9:05 PM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Could you test if this also fixes your regressions? It does. Thanks, Dave

[Bug middle-end/51211] ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark (trans-mem.c:2242) with -fgnu-tm -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer --param hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1 and __transaction_atomic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51211 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/43745] [avr] g++ puts VTABLES in SRAM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/51196] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com | ---

[Bug other/51022] powerpc libgcc static-object.mk error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51022 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50827] [4.7 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 0 type 'e' or 'u', have '0' (rtx entry_value) in loc_cmp, at var-tracking.c:3011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50827 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/51125] FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125 Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam

[Bug middle-end/51130] ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:468 with -fgnu-tm and __transaction_atomic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51130 Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50764] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2243 with -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -ftree-tail-merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50764 Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot

[Bug driver/28718] Call to -lgcc added prior to user libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot

[Bug c++/47611] [trans-mem] memory allocated by default new/new_vec operator can be considered as transaction local

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47611 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/50935] All slim LTO tests FAIL on 32-bit Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50935 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org

[Bug lto/50935] All slim LTO tests FAIL on 32-bit Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50935 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-21 16:50:54 UTC --- I forgot: while one could use ACX_LARGEFILE everywhere in GCC (and I tried that using --disable-largefile when configuring gcc

[Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 17:04:20 UTC --- Regarding label placement of frame related insns, we have the following rtl for f2: (insn 14 2 15 (sequence [ (call_insn 5 2 11 (parallel [

[Bug c++/51196] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-21 17:04:47 UTC --- Created attachment 25873 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25873 Sanity checked on x86_64-linux and lightly tested arm-none-eabi In

[Bug lto/50935] All slim LTO tests FAIL on 32-bit Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50935 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2011-11-21 17:25:20 UTC --- What's exactly the problem with gdb that requires disabling largefiles?

[Bug middle-end/51258] New: 64-bit gcc.dg/atomic-compare-exchange-5.c link failure on 32-bit Solaris/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258 Bug #: 51258 Summary: 64-bit gcc.dg/atomic-compare-exchange-5.c link failure on 32-bit Solaris/x86 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug lto/50935] All slim LTO tests FAIL on 32-bit Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50935 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-21 17:30:21 UTC --- --- Comment #5 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2011-11-21 17:25:20 UTC --- What's exactly the problem with gdb

[Bug bootstrap/50888] Bootstrap failure in libjava against latest git glibc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Haley aph at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 18:02:29 UTC --- I suppose I don't really object to a workaround in libjava, but surely the sensible thing to do is fix isspace() not to throw. It can't, anyway: that would be in

[Bug testsuite/51251] conflicting -mcpu switches during testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 --- Comment #9 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 19:11:56 UTC --- In addition to the comments so far about what the testsuite framework should be doing, I also think the sparc option processing is currently doing the right thing given the

[Bug middle-end/51258] 64-bit gcc.dg/atomic-compare-exchange-5.c link failure on 32-bit Solaris/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258 Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at

[Bug c++/50958] [C++0x] raw literal operator provides incorrect string for integer literal '0'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50958 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 19:27:35 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 21 19:27:30 2011 New Revision: 181595 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181595 Log: PR c++/50958 gcc/cp/

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug due to implicit_pure?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #16 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2011-11-21 19:31:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) Because it generates wrong-code and I wasn't completely convinced that there is no bug lurking in implicit_pure. Thus, for me the

[Bug middle-end/51258] 64-bit gcc.dg/atomic-compare-exchange-5.c link failure on 32-bit Solaris/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51258 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 19:41:16 UTC --- The quoted test ought to have worked for i386-solaris. If one of those predicates is wrong (e.g. is-effective-target ia32) then there are other tests in the

[Bug c++/50958] [C++0x] raw literal operator provides incorrect string for integer literal '0'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50958 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug due to implicit_pure?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 20:02:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) One thing it relies on is that the compiler recognizes that the bad function are not pure, as they have a side effect (e.g.

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug due to implicit_pure?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #18 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-11-21 20:21:01 UTC --- On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 08:02:20PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #17

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug due to implicit_pure?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.3 ---

[Bug debug/50827] [4.7 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 0 type 'e' or 'u', have '0' (rtx entry_value) in loc_cmp, at var-tracking.c:3011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50827 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 21:07:23 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 21 21:07:19 2011 New Revision: 181597 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181597 Log: PR debug/50827 *

[Bug preprocessor/51259] New: no escape on control characters on linemarker lines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51259 Bug #: 51259 Summary: no escape on control characters on linemarker lines Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial

[Bug fortran/51260] New: PARAMETER array with constructor initializer: Compile-time simplify single element access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260 Bug #: 51260 Summary: PARAMETER array with constructor initializer: Compile-time simplify single element access Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 --- Comment #21 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 21:50:46 UTC --- Author: davem Date: Mon Nov 21 21:50:41 2011 New Revision: 181598 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181598 Log: Revert regression causing changes to

[Bug middle-end/51261] New: [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug with memset()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51261 Bug #: 51261 Summary: [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug with memset() Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/51239] ICE with variadic template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51239 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/11750] class scope using-declaration lookup not implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libgomp/51249] semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-11-21 22:21:13 UTC --- Sorry, I misread the code. Indeed, the mutex will be left at 2. I'm chasing a frustratingly elusive locking bug. Symptoms are that one or two libgomp tests fail

[Bug c++/47747] [trans-mem] unsafe virtual function not properly displayed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47747 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/51262] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in primary_template_instantiation_p (pt.c:2874) with -flto -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51262 Bug #: 51262 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in primary_template_instantiation_p (pt.c:2874) with -flto -g Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug testsuite/51251] conflicting -mcpu switches during testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251 --- Comment #10 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-21 23:08:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) In addition to the comments so far about what the testsuite framework should be doing, I also think the sparc option processing is

[Bug middle-end/51263] ICE in inline_small_functions when compiling scummvm with -O2 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51263 --- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2011-11-21 23:58:48 UTC --- Created attachment 25876 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25876 pre-processed source of the file that triggers the ICE

[Bug middle-end/51263] New: ICE in inline_small_functions when compiling scummvm with -O2 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51263 Bug #: 51263 Summary: ICE in inline_small_functions when compiling scummvm with -O2 -flto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/51074] No constant folding performed for VEC_PERM_EXPR, VEC_INTERLEAVE*EXPR, VEC_EXTRACT*EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51074 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc

[Bug c++/51264] New: O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 Bug #: 51264 Summary: O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51264] O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22 01:38:07 UTC --- Minimal example tree.cc: ... extern void iterative_hash (const int *); unsigned int iterative_hash_expr (unsigned int val) { int code; switch (val) { default:

[Bug c++/51264] O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22 01:47:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) This might be a duplicate of PR20681, but I'm filing it just in case it's not. It is. I had some patches which improve the

[Bug c++/51264] O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at suse dot de ---

[Bug c++/51264] O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22 02:52:20 UTC --- dumps start diverging at tree.cc.004t.gimple: ... r181171 | r181172 unsigned int iterative_hash_expr(un unsigned int iterative_hash_expr(un

[Bug c++/51264] O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22 02:57:45 UTC --- Difference in dumps just before error in r181172, at tree.cc.014t.cfg: ... r181171 | r181172 unsigned int iterative_hash_expr(un unsigned

[Bug c++/51264] O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22 03:03:37 UTC --- Hmm, I don't think we need a clobber for the outer most scope of the function really. Though that might only allow us to get the bootstrap to work better

[Bug target/51134] [4.7 Regression] x86 memset/memcpy expansion is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-22 03:30:54 UTC --- On Linux/x86-64, configured with --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-shared --prefix=/usr/gcc-4.7.0

[Bug c++/51264] O0 Bootstrap failure: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51264 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-22 03:44:39 UTC --- Created attachment 25877 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25877 Patch which improves the use of clobbers for toplevel BIND expressions.

[Bug middle-end/51200] Wrong code sequence to store restrict volatile bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200 --- Comment #2 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com 2011-11-22 03:58:29 UTC --- Here is a test case fix. With this patch, backend part of Bernd's original patch can be skipped. Thus DJ's concern of unnecessary change can be addressed. Also this

[Bug middle-end/51261] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug with memset()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51261 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-11-22 05:30:59 UTC --- Happens in r181597 as well. $ diff testcase.*gkd 52c52 (const_int 32675 [0x7fa3]))) testcase.C:3# {*cmpdi_1} --- (const_int 32551

[Bug c++/51265] New: internal compiler error: in finish_decltype_type, at cp/semantics.c:5244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51265 Bug #: 51265 Summary: internal compiler error: in finish_decltype_type, at cp/semantics.c:5244 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/32039] Using declaration accepts non-visible members from base classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/51263] [4.7 regression] ICE in inline_small_functions when compiling scummvm with -O2 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51263 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus