[Bug gcov-profile/52627] [4.8 Regression] Build of libgcc fails w/o __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT: error: 'mx' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/52644] [4.8 Regression] ICE in stage2: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have '0' (rtx reg) in ix86_decompose_address, at config/i386/i386.c:11522

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52644 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52649] New: internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at predict.c:1812

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649 Bug #: 52649 Summary: internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at predict.c:1812 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status:

[Bug middle-end/52649] internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at predict.c:1812

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end

[Bug middle-end/52650] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 Bug #: 52650 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21 07:48:02 UTC --- Regstrapped with the patch in comment #2 without regression (but for pr52650;-).

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at

[Bug tree-optimization/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 08:05:56 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Mar 21 08:05:51 2012 New Revision: 185599 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185599 Log: 2012-03-21 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/52651] New: Fortran testsuite ICEs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52651 Bug #: 52651 Summary: Fortran testsuite ICEs with -flto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/52638] [4.8 Regression] ice in build_vector_from_val

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/52606] Confusing diagnostics for long identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 08:48:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already support 1) long symbol names (I

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at

[Bug middle-end/52649] internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at predict.c:1812

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649 --- Comment #1 from deepu.sarmatian at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 09:37:00 UTC --- Hi, Please delete the attachment. Though the bug is in the compiler, it seems it violates the security protocol of my concern.

[Bug bootstrap/52623] 4.7.0-RC-20120314: bootstrap failure on AIX due to multilib and using C++ in post-stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623 --- Comment #3 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2012-03-21 09:38:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) We should disable libquadmath on AIX. It is not needed or useful there. Have you tried adding

[Bug middle-end/52649] internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at predict.c:1812

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649 --- Comment #2 from deepu.sarmatian at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 09:43:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Hi, Please delete the attachment. Though the bug is in the compiler, it seems it violates the security protocol of my concern. Also

[Bug fortran/52652] New: call to gfc_match_asynchronous for allocatable at parse.c line 164

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652 Bug #: 52652 Summary: call to gfc_match_asynchronous for allocatable at parse.c line 164 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/40058] C++ FE generates struct assignments with mismatched sizes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40058 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 10:05:24 UTC --- If this ever gets fixed, we can remove a test in SRA as in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01356.html

[Bug c/52653] New: GCC 4.6.* bug on i386 Linux and mingw platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653 Bug #: 52653 Summary: GCC 4.6.* bug on i386 Linux and mingw platforms Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/52459] PRE performs stupid inserts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc

[Bug c++/52654] New: [C++11] Warn on overflow in user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654 Bug #: 52654 Summary: [C++11] Warn on overflow in user-defined literals Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 10:48:13 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Mar 21 10:48:08 2012 New Revision: 185602 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185602 Log: PR testsuite/52641 *

[Bug c/52653] GCC 4.6.* bug on i386 Linux and mingw platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug c/52655] New: right shit in switch: gcc compiles with error: label at end of compound statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655 Bug #: 52655 Summary: right shit in switch: gcc compiles with error: label at end of compound statement Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug c/52655] right shit in switch: gcc compiles with error: label at end of compound statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-03-21 11:29:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) The following code compiles with error: label at end of compound statement with the gcc 4.6.1 compiler. Content of t.c:

[Bug tree-optimization/52548] missed PRE optimization when function call follows to-be hoisted variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52548 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 11:33:25 UTC --- Created attachment 26940 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26940 patch Patch. Not sure what to do about PA_IN - can we even end up with

[Bug tree-optimization/52548] missed PRE optimization when function call follows to-be hoisted variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52548 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 11:40:49 UTC --- Ah, indeed we can. But we should be able to prune from PA_OUT.

[Bug middle-end/52653] GCC 4.6.* bug on i386 Linux and mingw platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/52655] right shit in switch: gcc compiles with error: label at end of compound statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||borut.razem

[Bug c/52655] confusing error: label at end of compound statement for default without statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52621] ICE when compiling Fortran77 code with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 --- Comment #3 from Jan Lachnitt pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2012-03-21 12:18:59 UTC --- Thanks for testing and for the link to GFortranBinaries. I have just installed the very recent unofficial build of gfortran: Using built-in specs.

[Bug c/52655] confusing error: label at end of compound statement for default without statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655 --- Comment #4 from Borut Ražem borut.razem at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 12:44:34 UTC --- What a shame :-( Sorry for the false alarm. Borut

[Bug middle-end/52653] GCC 4.6.* bug on i386 Linux and mingw platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-03-21 12:55:55 UTC --- It's caused by r158372, but silent with 4.7.0 on i686. Duplicate of PR50708.

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21 12:57:54 UTC --- I have posted the results for powerpc-apple-darwin9 with the patch in comment #0 at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg02399.html . It

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 13:01:07 UTC --- Created attachment 26941 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26941 Needs an ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL platform for testing

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING ---

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 13:03:57 UTC --- Ah, and obviously there should be a pointer_set_insert before VEC_safe_push...

[Bug libgcj/52645] gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 --- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:09:44 UTC --- This is from my Tru64 UNIX removal patch. Could you please check if IPPROTO_IPV6 and/or IPV6_MULTICAST_IF are defined in any

[Bug fortran/52621] ICE when compiling Fortran77 code with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21 13:12:51 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10, the code compiles with the options in comment #0 (with a lot of warnings) for 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.3, 4.7.0RC2, and trunk (with

[Bug c++/25362] pretty printing of expression fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25362 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/52461] [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 13:20:25 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Mar 21 13:20:20 2012 New Revision: 185605 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185605 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52543

[Bug fortran/52652] call to gfc_match_asynchronous for allocatable at parse.c line 164

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/52543] lower-subreg.c: code bloat of 300%-400% for multi-word memory splits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 13:20:25 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Mar 21 13:20:20 2012 New Revision: 185605 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185605 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52543

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suckfish at

[Bug middle-end/52621] ICE with -O3 -march=opteron in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1964

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:32:31 UTC --- I don't yet know if they are related. Now I do: I've just built a 32-bit C-only compiler on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 at r185563

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC --- On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #3 from ro at

[Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -O3 -march=opteron in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1964

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.6,

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:51:46 UTC --- --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC --- [...] If they are related

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-03-21 13:57:34 UTC --- On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #5 from ro at

[Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -O3 -march=opteron in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1964

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/47923] Errors when installing GCC 4.5.2 on AIX 6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47923 Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -O3 -march=opteron in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1964

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21 14:22:49 UTC --- Reduced test SUBROUTINE GHDSYM(IZ,IS,LMMAX,S,LMS,Y,L2M,DRL,NLAY2,K0,DCUT)!, ! COMPLEX Y(L2M,L2M),H(33),S(LMS) COMPLEX

[Bug bootstrap/52623] 4.7.0-RC-20120314: bootstrap failure on AIX due to multilib and using C++ in post-stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623 --- Comment #4 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2012-03-21 14:27:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) But the problem isn't with libquadmath itself, but with config-ml.in setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to find the

[Bug libgcj/52645] gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 14:43:57 UTC --- On 3/21/2012 9:09 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 --- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot

[Bug libgcj/52645] gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 15:04:51 UTC --- IPPROTO_IPV6 and IPV6_MULTICAST_IF are not defined in any system header on HP-UX 11.00. As far as I can tell, there is no

[Bug middle-end/52656] New: [4.8 regression] gcc.target/sparc/fpmul-2.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52656 Bug #: 52656 Summary: [4.8 regression] gcc.target/sparc/fpmul-2.c FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/52656] [4.8 regression] gcc.target/sparc/fpmul-2.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52656 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 15:51:23 UTC --- and with #if 1 they fail? As they are wrong-code regressions on an architecture I have no access to, can you see what is the

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #6 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-03-21 15:51:22 UTC --- Comment on attachment 26941 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26941 Needs an ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL platform for testing Where does

[Bug fortran/52622] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21 15:56:46 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10, compiling the test with 4.6.3, 4.7.0RC2, or trunk gives the follwoing errors pr52622.f90:130.2: function

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug target/52624] Missing __builtin_bswap16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26941|0 |1 is

[Bug rtl-optimization/52629] global buffer overflow in gcc/reload1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52629 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libgcj/52645] gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 16:22:38 UTC --- On 3/21/2012 11:04 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: Ok, but at least struct sockaddr_in6 is present in/fromnetinet/in.h, otherwise the HAVE_INET6 configure

[Bug target/52630] [4.7 regression] ICE when compiling ppl-0.12 testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52630 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libgcj/52645] gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 16:31:41 UTC --- --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 16:22:38 UTC --- On 3/21/2012 11:04 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot

[Bug other/52626] make check fixinclude test FAILURES

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52626 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|

[Bug libgcj/52645] gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libgcj/52645] gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 16:46:21 UTC --- Created attachment 26943 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26943 proposed patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/52657] New: [4.7/4.8 regression] error on asm during GMP build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657 Bug #: 52657 Summary: [4.7/4.8 regression] error on asm during GMP build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/52657] [4.7/4.8 regression] error on asm during GMP build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 17:00:22 UTC --- Dup of 48496.

[Bug rtl-optimization/52657] [4.7/4.8 regression] error on asm during GMP build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload in libffi/src/ia64/ffi.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #8 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com 2012-03-21 17:47:21 UTC --- Created attachment 26945 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26945 gcc -version output with -v added

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 18:34:55 UTC --- I would be willing to commit the patches once they're approved. Let me know.

[Bug middle-end/52450] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450 --- Comment #12 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 19:39:23 UTC --- Seems fixed on trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg02426.html Started working on movmisalign but implementation is a bit tricky.

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #10 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-03-21 19:46:31 UTC --- Works. ~13 sec for 243k entries. Still slower than GCC 3.4 but at least better than 80+ seconds.

[Bug target/52479] SH Target: SH4A DFmode fsca tests failing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 20:24:59 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Wed Mar 21 20:24:41 2012 New Revision: 185617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185617 Log: PR target/52479 *

[Bug target/50751] SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751 --- Comment #23 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 20:27:59 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Wed Mar 21 20:27:50 2012 New Revision: 185619 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185619 Log: PR target/50751 *

[Bug debug/52658] New: RECORD_TYPE in generic tree dump file with non-complete FIELD_DECL tree node

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52658 Bug #: 52658 Summary: RECORD_TYPE in generic tree dump file with non-complete FIELD_DECL tree node Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status:

[Bug debug/52658] RECORD_TYPE in generic tree dump file with non-complete FIELD_DECL tree node

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52658 --- Comment #1 from saturnman saturnman at 163 dot com 2012-03-21 20:40:09 UTC --- can any one add this FIX to code base. I just don't has an account, thx.

[Bug target/52642] SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 21:12:08 UTC --- Just for the record... I've committed the patch as rev 185616, but also messed up the ChangeLog / commit message header, so it doesn't show up here. (The

[Bug c++/52659] New: GCC fails to reject a deleted function definition which is not the first declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659 Bug #: 52659 Summary: GCC fails to reject a deleted function definition which is not the first declaration Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/52659] GCC fails to reject a deleted function definition which is not the first declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug target/52624] Missing __builtin_bswap16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 23:25:37 UTC --- Created attachment 26946 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26946 Patch that implements __builtin_bswap16 Untested patch.

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/52660] New: internal compiler error: in cxx_expand_expr, at cp/expr.c:114

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52660 Bug #: 52660 Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_expand_expr, at cp/expr.c:114 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 3.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52660] internal compiler error: in cxx_expand_expr, at cp/expr.c:114

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52660 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ae32000-elf

[Bug c++/52660] internal compiler error: in cxx_expand_expr, at cp/expr.c:114

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52660 --- Comment #2 from TaoShang shang_tao_123 at 163 dot com 2012-03-22 02:08:03 UTC --- Created attachment 26947 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26947 preprocessed source file

[Bug bootstrap/46981] multilib LD_LIBRARY_PATH prevents configuration of target libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46981 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/52623] 4.7.0-RC-20120314: bootstrap failure on AIX due to multilib and using C++ in post-stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-22 03:00:40 UTC --- AIX fundamentally wants to handle shared objects differently than SVR4/Solaris/Linux. AIX wants to package shared objects in an archive, like normal object

  1   2   >