[Bug target/56199] New: strcpy/strcat builtins generates suboptimal code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56199 Bug #: 56199 Summary: strcpy/strcat builtins generates suboptimal code. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/56199] strcpy/strcat builtins generates suboptimal code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56199 --- Comment #1 from Ondrej Bilka neleai at seznam dot cz 2013-02-04 08:42:32 UTC --- Created attachment 29344 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29344 benchmark

[Bug rtl-optimization/56175] Issue with combine phase on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2013-02-04 08:55:12 UTC --- Created attachment 29345 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29345 real test-case Need to be compiled with proposed options.

[Bug ada/56178] [4.8 Regression] Conversion of Long_Float to Integer triggers CONSTRAINT_ERROR overflow check failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56178 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 09:15:49 UTC --- bisected to ada/urealp.o, if this comes from -fprofile-use build, even if all other ada/*.o come from stage1, it still fails, if ada/urealp.o is from

[Bug middle-end/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 --- Comment #28 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 09:30:19 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 4 09:30:12 2013 New Revision: 195707 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195707 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug target/56199] strcpy/strcat builtins for constant strings generates suboptimal code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56199 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/56195] [4.8 Regression] Error: incorrect register `%rdi' used with `l' suffix (at -O2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56195 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/56192] global operator new() vs member operator new()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56192 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug middle-end/56188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-pta-10.c scan-ipa-dump pta ESCAPED = { (ESCAPED )?(NONLOCAL )?}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56188 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56186] [4.8 regression] function return ABI change for 128-bit types on Win64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56186 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/56185] [4.7 Regression] ICE for Arithmetic exception with -O2 and -fgraphite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56185 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56184] [4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error in push_reload during bootstrap stage 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56184 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/56182] [4.6 Regression] gcc/config/i386/t-linux64:29: recipe commences before first target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56182 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56181] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1581 with -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56181 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/56179] ERROR: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)recevied while installing gnuradio.git

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56179 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/56178] [4.8 Regression] Conversion of Long_Float to Integer triggers CONSTRAINT_ERROR overflow check failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56178 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/56177] [4.8 Regression] ICE when used forward for 'auto f();'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56177 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/56175] Issue with combine phase on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #48 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com 2013-02-04 10:11:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #40) if (ctor_recA-position ctor_recB-position) return -1; if (ctor_recA-position ctor_recB-position)

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #49 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com 2013-02-04 10:13:49 UTC --- I agree with Jakub: it's better to return back to the qsort version of the patch, since it fixes ASan as well, but also provides better support

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstreamchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar '

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #31 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 10:16:18 UTC --- The patch seems to have broken many testcases on platforms like Solaris 9 with Sun as that lack visibility support: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/covariant2.C

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstreamchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar '

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 10:22:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) The patch seems to have broken many testcases on platforms like Solaris 9 with Sun as that lack visibility support:

[Bug c++/56177] [4.8 Regression] ICE when used forward for 'auto f();'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56177 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c++/56177] [4.8 Regression] ICE when used forward for 'auto f();'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56177 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 10:26:52 UTC --- auto f (); auto f () { return 33; } is enough to reproduce it, ICEs also with -std=c++1y.

[Bug rtl-optimization/56151] [4.8 Regression] Performance degradation after r194054 on x86 Atom.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56151 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/56200] New: queens benchmark is faster with -O0 than with any other optimization level

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56200 Bug #: 56200 Summary: queens benchmark is faster with -O0 than with any other optimization level Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug ada/56178] [4.8 Regression] Conversion of Long_Float to Integer triggers CONSTRAINT_ERROR overflow check failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56178 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstreamchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar '

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 10:44:19 UTC --- Created attachment 29347 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29347 gcc48-pr54314.patch Ah, I see, solaris and mingw/cygwin have their

[Bug tree-optimization/55970] [x86] Avoid reverse order of function argument gimplifying

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55970 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug middle-end/56188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-pta-10.c scan-ipa-dump pta ESCAPED = { (ESCAPED )?(NONLOCAL )?}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56188 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 11:58:50 UTC --- ok, the difference is that in the working case we have Equivalence classes for Direct node node id 28:_10 are pointer: 11, location:0 Equivalence

[Bug rtl-optimization/56151] [4.8 Regression] Performance degradation after r194054 on x86 Atom.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56151 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug tree-optimization/55890] [4.7 Regression] calling a builtin func through a cast triggers an ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 12:04:41 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 4 12:04:35 2013 New Revision: 195708 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195708 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug middle-end/53844] [4.6/4.7 Regression] GCC generates suboptimal code for unused members of classes in some cases on multiple targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 12:04:42 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 4 12:04:35 2013 New Revision: 195708 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195708 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug lto/55660] [4.7 Regression] ICE instead of some warning during lto build with supplied different options (-funsigned-char vs none)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 12:04:43 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 4 12:04:35 2013 New Revision: 195708 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195708 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug middle-end/53844] [4.6 Regression] GCC generates suboptimal code for unused members of classes in some cases on multiple targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/55660] [4.7 Regression] ICE instead of some warning during lto build with supplied different options (-funsigned-char vs none)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/55890] [4.7 Regression] calling a builtin func through a cast triggers an ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 12:08:17 UTC --- Initial patch now backported, avoiding the C++ function overloading by using gimple_call_builtin_class_p.

[Bug fortran/56201] New: Realloc on assignment: Wrong code when assigning a zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56201 Bug #: 56201 Summary: Realloc on assignment: Wrong code when assigning a zero-sized array Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug lto/56168] [4.8 Regression] GCC seems to disregard -fno-builtin when compiling with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56168 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 12:19:34 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 4 12:19:25 2013 New Revision: 195709 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195709 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug lto/56168] [4.8 Regression] GCC seems to disregard -fno-builtin when compiling with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56168 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug go/56172] net FAILs on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-04 13:00:59 UTC --- Thanks for the analysis. Since you can recreate the bug, I guess the next step is to check the mp-waitsema field in

[Bug libstdc++/56202] New: SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Bug #: 56202 Summary: SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56131] [4.8 regression] gcc.dg/pr56035.c ICEs gcc on sparc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc-linux |sparc-*-*

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/56203] New: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 times out on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56203 Bug #: 56203 Summary: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 times out on Solaris/SPARC Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/56188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-pta-10.c scan-ipa-dump pta ESCAPED = { (ESCAPED )?(NONLOCAL )?}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56188 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 13:31:35 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 4 13:31:28 2013 New Revision: 195713 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195713 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug fortran/56204] New: [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/quad_[23].f90 FAIL on Solaris 9/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56204 Bug #: 56204 Summary: [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/quad_[23].f90 FAIL on Solaris 9/x86 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/56188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-pta-10.c scan-ipa-dump pta ESCAPED = { (ESCAPED )?(NONLOCAL )?}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56188 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56186] [4.8 regression] function return ABI change for 128-bit types on Win64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56186 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/38134] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] speed regression with many loop invariants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38134 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 14:47:31 UTC --- Ok, the goal would be to have all !targetm.legitimate_constant_p () constants assigned to a pseudo (and in GIMPLE to an SSA name). One piece of code

[Bug target/56199] strcpy/strcat builtins for constant strings generates suboptimal code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56199 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Bilka neleai at seznam dot cz 2013-02-04 15:15:12 UTC --- Created attachment 29349 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29349 icatche stressing benchmark

[Bug rtl-optimization/56131] [4.8 regression] gcc.dg/pr56035.c ICEs gcc on sparc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

[Bug target/56199] strcpy/strcat builtins for constant strings generates suboptimal code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56199 Ondrej Bilka neleai at seznam dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56131] [4.8 regression] gcc.dg/pr56035.c ICEs gcc on sparc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-02-04 15:39:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Mikael, I tested this on x86_64-linux and sparc64-linux. On x86_64 there were no test suite changes, Thanks

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/44061] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Warns about out-of-bounds array access inside __builtin_constant_p guarded section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44061 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 15:49:29 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 4 15:49:18 2013 New Revision: 195718 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195718 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug tree-optimization/55890] [4.7 Regression] calling a builtin func through a cast triggers an ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 15:49:29 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 4 15:49:18 2013 New Revision: 195718 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195718 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug tree-optimization/44061] [4.6 Regression] Warns about out-of-bounds array access inside __builtin_constant_p guarded section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44061 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/55890] [4.7 Regression] calling a builtin func through a cast triggers an ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/56194] FAIL: g++.dg/init/const9.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler-not rodata

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-04 16:03:08 UTC --- One thought I had is to add the -fpic option. This should push the function descriptor into .data.

[Bug target/47333] [4.6, 4.8 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6 regression]|[4.6, 4.8

[Bug tree-optimization/56205] New: [4.8 Regression] stdarg pass confused by jump threading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56205 Bug #: 56205 Summary: [4.8 Regression] stdarg pass confused by jump threading Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-02-04 16:21:54 UTC --- Note: I think we want also to consider the possibility that __e is zero at the same time and in that case simply discard the iteration completely.

[Bug target/56186] [4.8 regression] function return ABI change for 128-bit types on Win64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56186 --- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 16:37:51 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Mon Feb 4 16:37:44 2013 New Revision: 195721 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195721 Log: PR

[Bug target/56186] [4.8 regression] function return ABI change for 128-bit types on Win64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56186 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 17:11:15 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Feb 4 17:10:59 2013 New Revision: 195722 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195722 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56151] [4.8 Regression] Performance degradation after r194054 on x86 Atom.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56151 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 17:13:52 UTC --- Created attachment 29350 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29350 gcc48-pr56151.patch Untested patch for the peephole mentioned in

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstreamchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar '

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 17:20:05 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 4 17:19:56 2013 New Revision: 195723 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195723 Log: PR

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #50 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-04 17:24:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #49) I agree with Jakub: it's better to return back to the qsort version of the patch, since it fixes ASan as well, but

[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 17:29:41 UTC --- I don't understand the check for __e. If you continue, then neither __t nor __x change, the only difference is that you sample a new __e. But __e

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 17:35:00 UTC --- I would understand something like: const double __e = -std::log(1.0 - __aurng()); if (__t == __x) { return __x;

[Bug rtl-optimization/56131] [4.8 regression] gcc.dg/pr56035.c ICEs gcc on sparc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,

[Bug testsuite/56206] New: [4.7.3 regression] dg-require-effective-target arm_hard_vfp_ok triggers many test suite errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56206 Bug #: 56206 Summary: [4.7.3 regression] dg-require-effective-target arm_hard_vfp_ok triggers many test suite errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug rtl-optimization/56151] [4.8 Regression] Performance degradation after r194054 on x86 Atom.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56151 --- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 17:59:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Created attachment 29350 [details] gcc48-pr56151.patch Untested patch for the peephole mentioned in previous comment.

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-02-04 18:01:52 UTC --- You are right, but then I don't understand why we should compute __e *before* checking __t == __x, per your first patch (I think I managed to

[Bug testsuite/56207] New: 'make check-mpc' fails to build tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56207 Bug #: 56207 Summary: 'make check-mpc' fails to build tests Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/56206] [4.7.3 regression] dg-require-effective-target arm_hard_vfp_ok triggers many test suite errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56206 --- Comment #1 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 18:07:12 UTC --- Author: janis Date: Mon Feb 4 18:07:06 2013 New Revision: 195725 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195725 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/56151] [4.8 Regression] Performance degradation after r194054 on x86 Atom.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56151 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 18:20:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) Created attachment 29350 [details] gcc48-pr56151.patch Untested patch for the peephole

[Bug bootstrap/56182] [4.6 Regression] gcc/config/i386/t-linux64:29: recipe commences before first target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56182 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vapier at gentoo

[Bug testsuite/56206] [4.7.3 regression] dg-require-effective-target arm_hard_vfp_ok triggers many test suite errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56206 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] [F03] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #32 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 18:34:41 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Mon Feb 4 18:34:30 2013 New Revision: 195729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195729 Log: fortran/

[Bug fortran/54195] [4.8 Regression][OOP] IMPORT fails with GENERIC TBP: is already present in the interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195 --- Comment #16 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 18:34:42 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Mon Feb 4 18:34:30 2013 New Revision: 195729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195729 Log: fortran/

[Bug bootstrap/56182] [4.6 Regression] gcc/config/i386/t-linux64:29: recipe commences before first target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56182 wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 18:58:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) You are right, but then I don't understand why we should compute __e *before* checking __t == __x, per your first patch (I

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 19:00:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) You are right, but then I don't understand why we should compute __e *before* checking __t ==

[Bug fortran/54195] [4.8 Regression][OOP] IMPORT fails with GENERIC TBP: is already present in the interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195 --- Comment #17 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 19:06:15 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Mon Feb 4 19:06:06 2013 New Revision: 195730 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195730 Log: fortran/

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-02-04 19:23:38 UTC --- Ok, thanks Manuel. Let's go with this follow up then, mainline only. If nothing bad is reported may be suited for the branch too: Index:

[Bug libstdc++/56202] SIGFPE (division by zero) in std::binomial_distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 --- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 19:28:47 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Feb 4 19:28:40 2013 New Revision: 195732 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195732 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug c++/56208] New: sizeof sfinae fails to work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 Bug #: 56208 Summary: sizeof sfinae fails to work Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug inline-asm/56148] [4.8 Regression] inline asm matching constraint with different mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148 --- Comment #4 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2013-02-04 19:46:55 UTC --- Created attachment 29351 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29351 the questionable code hi, send in attach the code , (that in think) that is

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at

[Bug c++/56208] sizeof sfinae fails to work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2013-02-04 19:54:47 UTC --- I just notice that the problem is not restricted to sizeof sfinae. In fact if we define the first test overload as follows: templateclass U,

[Bug c++/56208] sizeof sfinae fails to work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2013-02-04 19:57:18 UTC --- The actually tested gcc version was 4.8.0 20130127 (experimental)

  1   2   >