https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64284
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 15 08:19:55 2014
New Revision: 218733
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218733root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64310
Bug ID: 64310
Summary: libgcc2.c:2051:1: internal compiler error: in
curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3383
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We should make mark_loop_for_removal more robust then, I am testing
Index: gcc/cfgloop.c
===
--- gcc/cfgloop.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64311
Bug ID: 64311
Summary: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is
achieved (90) with -fpic -march=corei7 for
gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpbroadcast[bw]-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64311
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evstupac at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64308
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Not sure if your analysis is correct, but value-range propagation computes
ret_4: VARYING
...
_12: [0, 4294967295]
_13: [0, 4294967295]
_14: [0, 18446744065119617025]
_15: [0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64307
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64298
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64295
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
The gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c test fails on the 4.9 branch on 32-bit
targets (i386, arm, s390):
gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c:24:9: warning: this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64291
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I suppose extracting a testcase for this is too hard?
Do you mean a testcase like the one I attached on Friday?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64287
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
Bug ID: 64312
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64254
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Let us track the gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpbroadcast[bw]-1.c failures in
pr64311.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64311
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64295
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, so we're folding g / 3 - g * (1 / 3) and then applyign the same transform
to 1 / 3 (because that's not constant folded with -frounding-math). I believe
the option combination
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, but in suitable form for gnat.dg (not sure how I can do
multi-file testcases there or which one would be the main one)
Most testcases are multi-file under gnat.dg... I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34282
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34282action=edit
Concatenated testcase for gnat.dg
To be gnatchop'ed and installed into the gnat.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 09:37:47 2014
New Revision: 218734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218734root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/64265
* tsan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The i386 testcase works for me now. It has static ctor that becomes pure so it
ought
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Rainer, should we close this now?
I'd rather keep it open or mark it suspended as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 09:46:21 2014
New Revision: 218735
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218735root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/64265
* tsan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 09:50:11 2014
New Revision: 218736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218736root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/64265
* tsan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64307
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
--- Comment #10 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #9)
(In reply to thopre01 from comment #7)
Strange, could you show the output of -fdump-tree-bswap?
Not so strange at all.
What is strange is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64308
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You would need symbolic ranges, b and ret are in [0,m-1]. And then you are
using that very specific x86 instruction that divides 64 bits by 32 bits but
only works if the result fits in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63674
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 15 10:34:46 2014
New Revision: 218738
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218738root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/63674
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 10:36:16 2014
New Revision: 218739
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218739root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58624
Backported from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 10:44:53 2014
New Revision: 218740
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218740root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63551
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63832
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
I'm testing following patch:
--cut here--
Index: crtstuff.c
===
--- crtstuff.c (revision 218733)
+++ crtstuff.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 10:47:14 2014
New Revision: 218741
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218741root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58624
Backported from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61189
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64210
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 10:50:52 2014
New Revision: 218743
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218743root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64210
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64210
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64310
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64290
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #28 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #27)
Currently missing are:
a) Finalization of the LHS during intrinsic assignment:
aka PR 64290
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64292
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Dec 15 12:15:14 2014
New Revision: 218745
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218745root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64292
* fold-const.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64292
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 15 12:20:10 2014
New Revision: 218746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218746root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64295
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64295
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 15 13:01:47 2014
New Revision: 218748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218748root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64313
Bug ID: 64313
Summary: [5 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/builtin-explog-1.c fails
on bare-metal targets
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64313
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14541
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #23)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #21)
Created attachment 34215 [details]
Link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.4
Known to fail|
++1 -c
(g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20141215 (experimental) as of r218745)
Results in:
cc1plus: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:87
0x768273 record_reference
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphbuild.c:87
0xc2dda3 walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64313
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64315
Bug ID: 64315
Summary: num_put misbehaves if the C library doesn't support
floats
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64315
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
Likely r181107 for pr50919.
Yes, this commit (authored by myself) is definitely the culprit here.
The nontriviality in the given test case is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
However with that patch the caught pointer is not null, so it's not right.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34283
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34283action=edit
reduced testcase
markus@x4 tmp % g++ -w -O2 -std=c++11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61524
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|hjl.tools
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Bug ID: 64316
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation
after r218503
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Started with r218515.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11)
Does this still fail after r218720, AKA [1]?
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01183.html
I think it is a dup of PR64037.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63594
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
Bug ID: 64317
Summary: [5 Regression] Ineffective allocation of PIC base
register
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54890
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60511
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231
--- Comment #8 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Sandra, I'm unable to reproduce this SEGV with a x-build of
aarch64-linux-gcc/native gcc with -O2 on the attached prepocessed test case.
Are there any other options I'm missing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
Here is a draft patch which does this (making the ICE disappear):
Regtests cleanly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||temporal at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 15 16:10:50 2014
New Revision: 218751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218751root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/63727
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58882
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Dec 15 16:16:29 2014
New Revision: 218752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218752root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-12-15 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58882
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218640root=gccview=rev
has fixed the bug that I was seeing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63889
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sounds sensible to me.
We switched to LRA quite late in gcc-4.9, so keeping a way to switch back in
case of problems was pragmatic. But we've been running with the new code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61253
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Dec 15 17:12:26 2014
New Revision: 218753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218753root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/61253
compiler: Support RecvStmt =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64218
--- Comment #8 from Antony Polukhin antoshkka at gmail dot com ---
A few more observations:
* Same Boost test compiles and works well on -mcpu=power8 with -fno-rtti
* Test fails to compile on -mcpu=power8 *WITH RTTI on*:
0x109ccb0b crash_signal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61248
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Dec 15 17:33:43 2014
New Revision: 218754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218754root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/61248
compiler: Ignore argument when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
struct A {
typedef int X;
template int X m_fn1() const;
};
template typename struct is_function {};
is_functionint() const i;
struct D {
template typename Y, typename =
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
