[Bug c++/70571] New: ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2259

--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160406 (experimental) [trunk revision 234771] (GCC) $ $ g++-5.3 -c small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -c small.cpp small.cpp: In function ‘void foo(vec, vec, int)’: small.cpp:4:14: internal compiler error

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #32 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- In an effort to enable C99-in-C++ functionality on newlib-based targets (including Cygwin and RTEMS), we just overhauled our feature test macros to be functionally compatible with glibc's. Ignoring the

[Bug c++/70570] New: Assembler error "symbol already defined" from nested lambdas and function-static variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70570 Bug ID: 70570 Summary: Assembler error "symbol already defined" from nested lambdas and function-static variable Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/70569] configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70569 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |bootstrap --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug libstdc++/70569] New: configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70569 Bug ID: 70569 Summary: configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70568] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- sradi, that is.

[Bug target/70568] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70568] New: PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 Bug ID: 70568 Summary: PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/68953] [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #5) > The patch changes the order of the subscript functions Oops, that's accesses, actually. > (that was the easiest > for me to implement) to: > [alias set,

[Bug tree-optimization/68953] [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 38207 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38207=edit demonstrator patch In add_pdr_constraints, for the EXTRADIM=0 case we have: ... accesses: { S_4[i1, i2] ->

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Wed Apr 6 23:10:14 2016 New Revision: 234802 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234802=gcc=rev Log: Fix C++ side of PR c/70436 (missing -Wparentheses warnings) gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Wed Apr 6 23:07:21 2016 New Revision: 234801 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234801=gcc=rev Log: Fix new -Wparentheses warnings encountered during bootstrap gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug c++/70567] internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70567 --- Comment #1 from baoshan --- This issue is seen from 4.8 to 5.0.

[Bug c++/70567] New: internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70567 Bug ID: 70567 Summary: internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1020 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I am planning to submit the following patch --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi2016-01-04 19:51:09.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi 2016-04-06 17:15:01.0 +0200 @@

[Bug fortran/52884] double precision constants promoted to 16 byte by -fdefault-real-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52884 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I am planning to submit the following patch --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi 2016-03-13 09:07:16.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/invoke.texi 2016-04-06 20:44:26.0 +0200 @@ -361,9

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The code in #5 is missing the initial parenthesised expression that exposes > the flaw in parsing logic - the left hand operand of the string concatenation > needs to be `('(')`, and not just the

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 --- Comment #6 from Ian Harvey --- The code in #5 is missing the initial parenthesised expression that exposes the flaw in parsing logic - the left hand operand of the string concatenation needs to be `('(')`, and not just the string literal.

[Bug c/70566] Bad ARM code generated for evaluating unsigned int bitfield value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70566 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Drake --- Created attachment 38206 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38206=edit main.i preprocessed output

[Bug c/70566] Bad ARM code generated for evaluating unsigned int bitfield value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70566 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Drake --- Created attachment 38205 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38205=edit other.c test case source

[Bug c/70566] New: Bad ARM code generated for evaluating unsigned int bitfield value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70566 Bug ID: 70566 Summary: Bad ARM code generated for evaluating unsigned int bitfield value Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Summary|[5/6

[Bug preprocessor/60723] Line directives with incorrect system header flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723 Bug 60723 depends on bug 61817, which changed state. Bug 61817 Summary: Inconsistent location of tokens in the expansion list of a built-in macro https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817 What|Removed

[Bug preprocessor/61817] Inconsistent location of tokens in the expansion list of a built-in macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/61817] Inconsistent location of tokens in the expansion list of a built-in macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817 --- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Apr 6 18:35:16 2016 New Revision: 234794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234794=gcc=rev Log: PR preprocessor/61817 PR preprocessor/69391 * internal.h

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5/6 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Apr 6 18:35:16 2016 New Revision: 234794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234794=gcc=rev Log: PR preprocessor/61817 PR preprocessor/69391 * internal.h

[Bug c++/70565] ICE at gimplify.c:8832 (cilkplus array extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565 --- Comment #1 from Yves Vandriessche --- Additionally, the same internal compile error is produced when substituting: > cilk_for ( int row = 0; row < nrows; row++ ) { with >#pragma omp parallel scheduler(dynamic, 256) > for ( int row = 0;

[Bug c++/70565] New: ICE at gimplify.c:8832 (cilkplus array extension)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565 Bug ID: 70565 Summary: ICE at gimplify.c:8832 (cilkplus array extension) Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jason Vas Dias from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > Where do you see -nostdlib being used? I see it neither in your #c0, nor in > > #c1. > > Looking at my

[Bug libstdc++/70564] New: Problem with std::experimental::not_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70564 Bug ID: 70564 Summary: Problem with std::experimental::not_fn Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #9 from Jason Vas Dias --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Where do you see -nostdlib being used? I see it neither in your #c0, nor in > #c1. > Looking at my buildlog, -nostdlib is used to link only some libraries,

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Where do you see -nostdlib being used? I see it neither in your #c0, nor in #c1. Looking at my buildlog, -nostdlib is used to link only some libraries, like libstdc++.so.6 itself, or libvtv, libsanitizer

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #7 from Jason Vas Dias --- So since I've produced a working Stage3 compiler in the build directory, './', './prev-gcc' should be the directory containing the Stage2 gcc build, and it does in my case, with a config.log : $ grep

[Bug c++/70029] [6 Regression] ICE with C++11 and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Hmm, both options sounds quite involved. Perhaps for stage4 we can simply drop the sanity check and add yet another FIXME to the verifier? Alias.c is relatively robust about walking to main variants so I can't

[Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnings for lifetime DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/70398] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-9.c FAILs with -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70398 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Apr 6 16:48:36 2016 New Revision: 234792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234792=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug c++/70563] New: SFINEA fails when trying invalid template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70563 Bug ID: 70563 Summary: SFINEA fails when trying invalid template instantiation Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/63336] cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336 Yves Vandriessche changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yves.vandriessche at intel dot com

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #6 from Jason Vas Dias --- Yes, Jakub, thanks, I know : > If you link with g++ or xg++ instead of gcc or xgcc, then the driver is > adding > -lstdc++ automatically. But it is not ME linking, it is the gcc-5.3.0 Makefile.in /

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that the following test compiles with gfortran from at least 4.8 up to trunk (6.0) PROGRAM ReadMeTwo IMPLICIT NONE CHARACTER(10) :: var READ '('//'A)', var PRINT *, var END PROGRAM

[Bug fortran/47040] Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-04/msg00024.html.

[Bug c++/70543] [6 Regression] wrong non-const error for enable_if and constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70501] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70501 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00191.html but read the thread for why that's not the best patch. Continuing ...

[Bug c++/68159] Demangler crash (GDB PR 19190)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68159 Paul Brannan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||curlypaul924 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/66605] -Wunused-parameter causes internal compiler error with gfortran 5.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66605 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70559] Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems this got fixed (or is dup of) PR64905, r220416 in particular, but you want r220414 and r220441 too.

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 --- Comment #9 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch I posted for PR70289 a couple of days ago also resolves this issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00202.html

[Bug bootstrap/70519] genmatch fails to compile under gcc-5.2.0 - missing '-lstdc++' .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519 --- Comment #4 from Jason Vas Dias --- Thanks for having a look at this, Richard . Yes, "some weirdness" is definitely going on - but I'd like to determine precisely which "weirdness". This occurred when building my new LFS system's system

[Bug ipa/70559] Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org |cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/55427] [OOP] ICE with class-array-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/70550] -Wuninitialized false positives in OpenMP code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60853] Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||baradi09 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/70562] User defined assignment does not distinguish between ranks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70562 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/70561] Crash in recog_for_combine_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70561 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70562] New: User defined assignment does not distinguish between ranks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70562 Bug ID: 70562 Summary: User defined assignment does not distinguish between ranks Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- In that case it is a backend enhancement request. Backends have many ways how to deal with this, starting from specialized patterns, or using the lower subreg passes, using their own splitters etc. and many

[Bug c++/39159] unhelpful attribute warning on matching declaration after definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159 --- Comment #6 from Gert --- I forgot to mention: the patch is against 5.3.0.

[Bug fortran/55427] [OOP] ICE with class-array-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC|dominiq at lps dot ens.fr | --- Comment #4 from

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 --- Comment #5 from Albert Cahalan --- This example shows the most simple form of the problem: unsigned long long ull; void simple64(void){ ull = 0; } NOTE: In the assembly below, I might have missing/excess parentheses. Assembler

[Bug target/67478] gcc-5.1.0/gcc-5.2.0 undefined symbol std::__once_callable in AIX 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67478 --- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn --- The libstdc++ build process was updated to recognize LTS symbols. Please use GCC 5.3 or later.

[Bug c++/39159] unhelpful attribute warning on matching declaration after definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159 Gert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gw.fossdev at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 from

[Bug middle-end/70550] -Wuninitialized false positives in OpenMP code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70550 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 6 12:42:24 2016 New Revision: 234779 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234779=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/70550 * tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT):

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 --- Comment #4 from Albert Cahalan --- Mostly it's more like PR58741 because of the long long issue. PR22141 (and PR23684 which is a better match) is about merging small things. Two of the six examples here show that problem, those being the

[Bug middle-end/70561] Crash in recog_for_combine_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70561 --- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt --- (Ah, probably add_clobbers should have added the clobber, but it hasn't. It doesn't have any code for that pattern.)

[Bug c++/70549] insn does not satisfy its constraints aarch64 gcc-4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70549 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon --- I've reproduced it too with our latest 4.8, and I confirm it compiles OK with the very first commit in branch 4.9. Since you switched to 4.9, I will not investigate more.

[Bug middle-end/70561] Crash in recog_for_combine_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70561 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- P.S.: (gdb) p debug_rtx(pat) (set (reg:SI 67 [+4 ]) (and:SI (not:SI (subreg:SI (reg/v:DI 65 [ b+-4 ]) 4)) (mem:SI (plus:DI (reg:DI 2 %r2 [ a ]) (const_int 4 [0x4])) [1 *a_2(D)+4

[Bug middle-end/70561] New: Crash in recog_for_combine_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70561 Bug ID: 70561 Summary: Crash in recog_for_combine_1 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug target/60290] 32-bit g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc FAILs on Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60290 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] |i386-pc-solaris2.1[012]

[Bug libstdc++/70560] Review configure checks for _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS and atomicity_dir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/70560] New: Review configure checks for _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS and atomicity_dir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560 Bug ID: 70560 Summary: Review configure checks for _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS and atomicity_dir Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/63345] Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast<>) in libstdc++-v3/include/bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345 --- Comment #11 from Malcolm Parsons --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > > The attached patch fixes it for me. > > That seems to be a backport of r223746 from trunk, right? I'll look into > applying that to the gcc-5 branch.

[Bug tree-optimization/70177] [6 Regression] ICE in extract_ops_from_tree starting with r233660

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70177 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 10:31:27 2016 New Revision: 234776 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234776=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/70513] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70513 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- But unfortunately that patch fixes Comment 3 but not the original testcase...

[Bug libstdc++/63345] Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast<>) in libstdc++-v3/include/bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Malcolm Parsons from comment #9) > Created attachment 38201 [details] > fix undefined behaviour in stl_tree.h > > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > > I believe all the real

[Bug libstdc++/63345] Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast<>) in libstdc++-v3/include/bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345 Malcolm Parsons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||malcolm.parsons at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/65438] Unnecessary ptr check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/65438] Unnecessary ptr check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65438 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- Created attachment 38200 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38200=edit patch

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot or

[Bug fortran/55427] [OOP] ICE with class-array-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Comment #3

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/62254] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc-4.9 ICEs on linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 --- Comment #21 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #19) > (In reply to Julien Margetts from comment #17) > > The following test case still fails with the patch applied (originally bug > > 70362) > > > >

[Bug fortran/43207] [OOP] invalid (pointer) assignment to and from abstract non-polymorphic expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43207 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/70550] -Wuninitialized false positives in OpenMP code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38194|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/70558] POD datatype array crash in initialization when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70558 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67478] gcc-5.1.0/gcc-5.2.0 undefined symbol std::__once_callable in AIX 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67478 --- Comment #9 from Qingshan Zhang --- Or do we have any work round for this issue ? Thank you.

[Bug tree-optimization/69760] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong 64-bit memory address caused by an unneeded overflowing 32-bit integer multiplication on x86_64 under -O2 and -O3 code optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 08:09:40 2016 New Revision: 234775 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234775=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug target/67478] gcc-5.1.0/gcc-5.2.0 undefined symbol std::__once_callable in AIX 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67478 Qingshan Zhang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qshanz at cn dot ibm.com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/69983] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-sor.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "number of SCoPs: 1" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 08:09:40 2016 New Revision: 234775 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234775=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/68963] [4.9 Regression] O3 vs. O2 discards part of loop and terminates early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68963 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:57:47 2016 New Revision: 234774 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234774=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/70115] [5 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 (seg fault) and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70115 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/70022] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: in tree_to_shwi, at tree.c:7328 with out-of-bounds vector index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70022 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:51:19 2016 New Revision: 234773 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234773=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/70424] [4.9/5 Regression] Pointer derived from integer gets reduced alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70424 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:51:19 2016 New Revision: 234773 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234773=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/70115] [5 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 (seg fault) and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70115 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:51:19 2016 New Revision: 234773 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234773=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/70430] Incorrect result for logical "and" operation with mixed vector and scalar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70430 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/70333] [5 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O0.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70333 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:45:34 2016 New Revision: 234772 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234772=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/70430] Incorrect result for logical "and" operation with mixed vector and scalar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70430 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 6 07:45:34 2016 New Revision: 234772 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234772=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/70484] [4.9 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing and access via char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70484 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.4.0 Summary|[4.9/5

  1   2   >