[Bug lto/79061] [7 Regression][LTO][ASAN] LTO plus ASAN fails with "AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061 --- Comment #8 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Comment on attachment 40514 [details] > Untested fix 1. > > But DECL_SOURCE_FILE is not the main input file of the TU that contains it, > if e.g. a variable

[Bug lto/79061] [7 Regression][LTO][ASAN] LTO plus ASAN fails with "AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think it is fine if it has DECL_NAME NULL, but it would be helpful if DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION of the TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL was set to some location in the main input file (e.g. first column on first line of

[Bug bootstrap/79098] [7 Regression] Failure to bootstrap gcc for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79098 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe |powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

[Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660 --- Comment #13 from mpf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12) > > Maybe the load sign-extends instead of zero-extending as specified > > initially. > > But I'm not sure that this matters here, since: > > (insn 58

[Bug c++/71737] [5/6 Regression] ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE |[5/6 Regression] ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jan 16 09:33:12 2017 New Revision: 244487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244487=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-13 Richard Biener PR

[Bug c++/79095] [7 regression] spurious stringop-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79095 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug translation/79100] New: Superfluous % in messages from cfgloop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79100 Bug ID: 79100 Summary: Superfluous % in messages from cfgloop.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/79085] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-none-eabi

[Bug bootstrap/79098] [7 Regression] Failure to bootstrap gcc for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79098 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug demangler/79099] Memory leak in cplus-dem.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79099 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/79089] [7 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79089 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/78887] [7 Regression] Failure to build aarch64 allmodconfig Linux kernel 4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/32199] jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of 805021000 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED --- Comment #20 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] [5/6/7 Regression] redundant && || not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #32 from Richard

[Bug c++/79091] [7 regression] ICE in write_unnamed_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79091 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/79058] [7 Regression] ARM: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058 --- Comment #22 from Dominik Vogt --- That looks like a similar problem. I'm lacking some knowledge about how register pairs are allocated for paradoxical subregs on bigendian systems though. Deducing from the code quoted above and from what

[Bug tree-optimization/79054] missing range information with INT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79054 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Target|poerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-* CC|

[Bug c++/71737] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Jan 16 09:09:30 2017 New Revision: 244486 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244486=gcc=rev Log: /c-family 2017-01-16 Paolo Carlini

[Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- > Maybe the load sign-extends instead of zero-extending as specified initially. But I'm not sure that this matters here, since: (insn 58 57 59 3 (set (subreg:SI (reg:DI 316 [ iftmp.3_114 ]) 0)

[Bug tree-optimization/71437] [7 regression] Performance regression after r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437 --- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > With -fwhole-program there's no regression from GCC 6.2 to current trunk. > Without I still can see a small regression (here 0.86s vs 0.92s). > >

[Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660 --- Comment #16 from mpf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #15) > That's incorrect, see what reload1.c:eliminate_regs_1 says about it: > > if (MEM_P (new_rtx) > && ((x_size < new_size >

[Bug c++/79101] New: Registers aren't used for passing and returning objects when there is a move constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79101 Bug ID: 79101 Summary: Registers aren't used for passing and returning objects when there is a move constructor Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/78702] [libstdc++] class __shim in locale::facet is private

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78702 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jan 16 11:41:41 2017 New Revision: 244491 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244491=gcc=rev Log: PR78702 fix accessibility of locale::facet::__shim PR libstdc++/78702

[Bug tree-optimization/79054] missing range information with INT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79054 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from

[Bug bootstrap/79098] [7 Regression] Failure to bootstrap gcc for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79098 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug bootstrap/79098] [7 Regression] Failure to bootstrap gcc for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79098 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Jan 16 11:12:57 2017 New Revision: 244489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244489=gcc=rev Log: Powerpc bootstrap failure due to duplicate case value PR target/79098

[Bug c++/79101] Registers aren't used for passing and returning objects when there is a move constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79101 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/76731] [AVX512] _mm512_i32gather_epi32 and other scatter/gather routines have incorrect signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Senkevich --- (In reply to Kirill Yukhin from comment #10) > (In reply to Andrew Senkevich from comment #8) > > I think we should follow here declarations from icc headers to be compatible > > with it. > Okay. Could

[Bug tree-optimization/71437] [7 regression] Performance regression after r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/79088] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79088 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Boostrapped/tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

[Bug c/78768] -Walloca-larger-than and -Wformat-length warnings disabled by -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- > Yes, that is true but the upper 32-bits still need to be 'zero'. What > happens later on is that the (subreg:SI (reg:DI 316)) is spilled, spilling > only 32-bits to the stack but it gets reloaded as

[Bug rtl-optimization/70710] [5/6 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O -g -fpeel-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70710 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/78389] list::merge and list::sort are not exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389 --- Comment #6 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Jan 16 11:36:33 2017 New Revision: 244490 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244490=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/78389 fix backwards size adjustments. PR libstdc++/78389 *

[Bug libstdc++/78702] [libstdc++] class __shim in locale::facet is private

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78702 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug translation/79100] Superfluous % in messages from cfgloop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79100 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug go/79037] gccgo: Binaries crash with parforsetup: pos is not aligned on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2) > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #1) > > I'll report back tomorrow. > > Problem persists: Correction: The patch

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660 --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou --- > So does LRA generate a full 64-bit load or an extended 32-to-64-bit load? The former it seems, I can see: (insn 218 211 8356 2 (set (reg:SI 4 $4 [2479]) (ne:SI (reg:DI 22 $22 [orig:230 _3 ]

[Bug regression/53203] [5/6/7 Regression]: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53203 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/79077] [7 regression][new inheriting ctors] bad code for inherited ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79077 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/79098] [7 Regression] Failure to bootstrap gcc for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79098 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77498] [7 regression] Performance drop after r239414 on spec2000/172mgrid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, ra

[Bug tree-optimization/77498] [7 regression] Performance drop after r239414 on spec2000/172mgrid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498 --- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > CCing Bin, he was looking into PRE/predcom as well AFAIR. predictive > commoning here performs unrolling to be able to avoid some loop-carried >

[Bug fortran/78781] [7 Regression] [Coarray] ICE in gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status, at fortran/trans.c:1588

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78781 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78935] [7 Regression] ICE on allocating derived type coarray with allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c/79102] New: gcc fails to auto-vectorise the product of an array of complex floats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79102 Bug ID: 79102 Summary: gcc fails to auto-vectorise the product of an array of complex floats Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/78389] list::merge and list::sort are not exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389 --- Comment #7 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Jan 16 13:30:58 2017 New Revision: 244492 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244492=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/78389 fix backwards size adjustments Backport from mainline

[Bug lto/79061] [7 Regression][LTO][ASAN] LTO plus ASAN fails with "AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061 --- Comment #10 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Yeah, but it seems that lto doesn't propagate source location either: /* Output info about new location into bitpack BP. After outputting bitpack, lto_output_location_data has to be done to output

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- Indeed it is.

[Bug fortran/68887] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Depends on|

[Bug debug/78835] [7 regression] ICE with -fdebug-types-section and member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- So initially we generate DIE0: DW_TAG_GNU_call_site (0x768cd690) abbrev id: 0 offset: 0 mark: 0 DW_AT_low_pc: label: *.LVL1 DW_AT_abstract_origin: address but that later gets rewritten

[Bug libstdc++/78389] list::merge and list::sort are not exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389 --- Comment #8 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Jan 16 13:32:39 2017 New Revision: 244493 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244493=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/78389 fix backwards size adjustments Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #16 from Milian Wolff --- So how can I silence the warning then for the case I pasted in the first comment: ~~~+ #include template struct foo {}; foo emit_unexpected_warning; int main() { return

[Bug bootstrap/78616] Poison strndup in system.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79103] New: [7 Regression] build_variant_type_copy ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79103 Bug ID: 79103 Summary: [7 Regression] build_variant_type_copy ICE Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/71737] [5/6 Regression] ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 --- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Jan 16 15:43:06 2017 New Revision: 244496 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244496=gcc=rev Log: /c-family 2017-01-16 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/71737] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 Bug 71737 depends on bug 79103, which changed state. Bug 79103 Summary: [7 Regression] build_variant_type_copy ICE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79103 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/79103] [7 Regression] build_variant_type_copy ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79103 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71737] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/79103] [7 Regression] build_variant_type_copy ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79103 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/79051] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for warnings, line 140)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79051 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Jan 16 15:50:47 2017 New Revision: 244497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244497=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/79051 - FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for warnings, line 140)

[Bug debug/78835] [7 regression] ICE with -fdebug-types-section and member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps we could combine the #c1 patch with some changes to make sure we don't prune those types that appear in callgraph edges callee contexts? Is the early finish debug hook called after some minimal

[Bug bootstrap/78616] Poison strndup in system.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616 --- Comment #14 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Jan 16 15:03:41 2017 New Revision: 244494 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244494=gcc=rev Log: system.h: Poison strndup (PR bootstrap/78616) gcc/ChangeLog: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/79054] missing range information with INT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79054 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- I committed r244497 to avoid exercising the test case on that line on non-x86_64 targets. It passes on x86_64 with the native compiler and with a sparc-sun-solaris2.11 cross-compiler, in both ILP32 and LP64

[Bug libstdc++/66145] [5/6/7 Regression] std::ios_base::failure objects thrown from libstdc++.so use old ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jan 16 15:58:06 2017 New Revision: 244498 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244498=gcc=rev Log: PR66145 use new ABI for std::ios::failure exceptions PR libstdc++/66145

[Bug libstdc++/66145] [5/6/7 Regression] std::ios_base::failure objects thrown from libstdc++.so use old ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/79061] [7 Regression][LTO][ASAN] LTO plus ASAN fails with "AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061 --- Comment #11 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #10) > Yeah, but it seems that lto doesn't propagate source location either: > > /* Output info about new location into bitpack BP. >After outputting

[Bug fortran/70696] [Coarray] ICE on EVENT POST of host-associated EVENT_TYPE coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Compiling the test in comment 0 with -fcoarray=lib -lcaf_single at r244453 fails at link time with Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "_caf_token.0.3515", referenced from:

[Bug preprocessor/79106] wrong source line printed in diagnostics for a translation unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/78835] [7 regression] ICE with -fdebug-types-section and member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- The important thing is that it is only possible to refer to a single DIE in the type unit (.debug.types.* in DWARF4, .debug_info DW_UT_type unit in DWARF5); in the #c0 case it is the Bar

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #27 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #26) > Hello, did the Gap scores on arm too? Both Itanium and PPC testers seems to > show improved gap scores, so hope arm and the other ppc tester too. On

[Bug fortran/78505] [F08] Coarray source allocation not synchronizing on oversubscribed cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505 --- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- The effort is quite significant, because several support functions have to be ported from other commits. I.e., I do not want to spend too much time on it.

[Bug c++/79104] New: [7.0 regression] ambiguity calling std::end on a local constexpr array of structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104 Bug ID: 79104 Summary: [7.0 regression] ambiguity calling std::end on a local constexpr array of structs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/79104] [7.0 regression] ambiguity calling std::end on a local constexpr array of structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid See Also|

[Bug debug/78835] [7 regression] ICE with -fdebug-types-section and member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Now, even going through all cgraph edges and marking the callee DIEs as used (setting die_mark for them) early (but I guess it would be better to do the early finish then after early optimizations, but

[Bug c++/79104] [7.0 regression] ambiguity calling std::end on a local constexpr array of structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- As a couple of additional data points EDG 4.11 and IBM XLC++ both reject the test case. EDG with an error similar to GCC.

[Bug target/79058] [7 Regression] ARM: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/78835] [7 regression] ICE with -fdebug-types-section and member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40524 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40524=edit gcc7-pr78835.patch Untested patch that fixes the ICE on this testcase by marking directly called functions as needed.

[Bug preprocessor/79106] New: wrong source line printed in diagnostics for a translation unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106 Bug ID: 79106 Summary: wrong source line printed in diagnostics for a translation unit Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/79061] [7 Regression][LTO][ASAN] LTO plus ASAN fails with "AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40514|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/79105] New: Autovectorized NEON code slower than vfpv4 on Cortex A5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79105 Bug ID: 79105 Summary: Autovectorized NEON code slower than vfpv4 on Cortex A5 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/68933] ICE when mixing "-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage" and "-fcoarray=lib" on gcc-6 only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68933 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/79097] coarray and pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79097 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/78304] [7 Regression] -Wformat doesn't warn anymore for inttypes.h format string argument type mismatches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304 --- Comment #9 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Jan 16 18:08:45 2017 New Revision: 244502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244502=gcc=rev Log: Fix testcases for PR c/78304 The testcases as written made assumptions about

[Bug target/79066] [7 Regression] non-PIC code generated for powerpc glibc with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79066 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Jan 17 02:54:11 2017 New Revision: 244515 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244515=gcc=rev Log: PR79066, non-PIC code generated for powerpc glibc with -fpic PR target/79066

[Bug target/78633] [7 Regression] [SH] libgcc/fp-bit.c:944:1: error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633 --- Comment #19 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Tue Jan 17 04:07:51 2017 New Revision: 244516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244516=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78633 * config/sh/sh.md (cmpeqsi_t+1): Call copy_rtx

[Bug target/78633] [7 Regression] [SH] libgcc/fp-bit.c:944:1: error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633 --- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima --- I've applied a quick fix. I'd like to keep this open for further checks.

[Bug target/79066] [7 Regression] non-PIC code generated for powerpc glibc with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79066 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79107] New: ICE on name resolution within internal subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79107 Bug ID: 79107 Summary: ICE on name resolution within internal subroutine Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Followup was here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2016-02/msg6.html 2016-02-15 Ben Elliston Reported by David Malcolm. * lib/dejagnu.exp (text):

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4) > Followup was here: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2016-02/msg6.html which is:

[Bug c/68473] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79104] [7.0 regression] ambiguity calling std::begin on a local constexpr array of structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/78365] [7 Regression] ICE in determine_value_range, at tree-ssa-loo p-niter.c:413

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365 Andrew Senkevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot co

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka --- > On SPEC2000 the latest changes look good, compared to the old predictor gap > improved by 10% and INT/FP by 0.8%/0.6%. I'll run SPEC2006 tonight. It is rather surprising you are seeing such large changes

[Bug fortran/79107] ICE on name resolution within internal subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79107 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/33562] [5/6 Regression] aggregate DSE disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562 --- Comment #32 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017 New Revision: 244509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-16 Jeff Law PR tree-optimization/79090

[Bug middle-end/61912] Missed (partial) dead store elimination for structures on GIMPLE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017 New Revision: 244509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-16 Jeff Law PR tree-optimization/79090

  1   2   >