[Bug target/84033] powerpc64le -moptimize-swaps bad code with vec_vbpermq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84033 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84033] New: powerpc64le -moptimize-swaps bad code with vec_vbpermq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84033 Bug ID: 84033 Summary: powerpc64le -moptimize-swaps bad code with vec_vbpermq Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/83211] Warning: ignoring incorrect section type for .init_array.00200

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83211 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Target||rx*-*-* arm*-*-*

[Bug other/68239] libbacktrace allocation is sometimes very slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68239 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/84032] New: ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1064

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84032 Bug ID: 84032 Summary: ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1064 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug other/68239] libbacktrace allocation is sometimes very slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68239 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Thu Jan 25 02:24:45 2018 New Revision: 257039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257039=gcc=rev Log: PR other/68239 * mmap.c (backtrace_free_locked): Don't put

[Bug target/81550] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/loop_align.c fails starting with r250482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81550 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81550] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/loop_align.c fails starting with r250482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81550 --- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Thu Jan 25 01:09:19 2018 New Revision: 257038 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257038=gcc=rev Log: [gcc/testsuite] 2018-01-24 Michael Meissner

[Bug c++/84031] New: structured binding unpacks nameless padding bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84031 Bug ID: 84031 Summary: structured binding unpacks nameless padding bitfields Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/83950] [8 regression] error: no matching function for call to ‘folly::dynamic::at(size_t&) const’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83950 --- Comment #3 from Sunil Pandey --- I shouldn't say it's bug, sorry about that. Just application build regression from GCC 7 to GCC 8. Looks like creduce reduced this test case too much in this case.

[Bug jit/82846] [8 regression] jit.dg test-alignment.c.exe, test-combination.c.exe, test-threads.c.exe fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #6 from David

[Bug jit/82846] [8 regression] jit.dg test-alignment.c.exe, test-combination.c.exe, test-threads.c.exe fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Jan 25 00:45:51 2018 New Revision: 257037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257037=gcc=rev Log: Fix jit.dg/test-alignment* (PR jit/82846) These testcases jit-compile functions

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- It is first V2DI in the RTL, which exists just fine (but there is no such divide insn); then when it is split to two DImode divides, it just generates div:DI etc., which does not exist for -m32. So we

[Bug target/68467] libgcc, compilation for target m68k-linux breaks in linux_atomic.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68467] libgcc, compilation for target m68k-linux breaks in linux_atomic.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467 --- Comment #19 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Jan 24 23:36:29 2018 New Revision: 257032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257032=gcc=rev Log: Fix m68k-linux-gnu libgcc build for ColdFire (PR target/68467). PR target/68467

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/83999] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #3) > OK for trunk? Ok, thanks.

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- But I assume that's your transcription error. In the test case the arguments are vector long long.

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- That looks completely invalid, the args should be vector long long, not long long.

[Bug target/83994] %ebx is clobbered by stack-clash probing for regparm-3 function in PIC mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83994 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83994] %ebx is clobbered by stack-clash probing for regparm-3 function in PIC mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83994 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 24 21:57:16 2018 New Revision: 257031 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257031=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83994 * i386.c (get_probe_interval): Move to earlier

[Bug target/83743] -mcpu=native causes gcc to exit in error if cpu is not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83743 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug c++/83990] [7/8 Regression] Spurious "potential null pointer dereference" warning regression from 7.1 onwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug jit/82846] [8 regression] jit.dg test-alignment.c.exe, test-combination.c.exe, test-threads.c.exe fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/83948] Thread safety issue writing to internal file - libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948 --- Comment #7 from Bill Long --- Thanks - very helpful information. I'll try to find out what version of gcc was used to build their library.

[Bug middle-end/84024] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in operator>, at profile-count.h:855

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84024 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83055] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:834

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #4 from Will Schmidt --- I'm having a moment of doubt on the validity of the testcases involved here. vector long long a = vec_div(long long b, long long c); Any chance that is invalid for -m32 ? I don't see a whole lot of

[Bug libfortran/83948] Thread safety issue writing to internal file - libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that I got a Internal Error: stash_internal_unit(): Stack Size Exceeded when using mismatched gfortran 7.2.0 and omp_lib.mod.

[Bug c++/84030] New: Name lookup in presence of namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84030 Bug ID: 84030 Summary: Name lookup in presence of namespace Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libfortran/83948] Thread safety issue writing to internal file - libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948 --- Comment #5 from Bill Long --- I tried on my Mac laptop (gcc version 6.3.0) and it also works there. Evidently not a representative test. The differences I see between that environment and the original customer's is that they are running

[Bug target/84010] [sparc64] Problematic TLS code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84010 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson --- For better rematerialization, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to represent this as (set (reg:P tmp) (const:P (unspec [(symbol_ref "xxx")] UNSPEC_TLSIE))) prior to reload, and split to

[Bug libfortran/83948] Thread safety issue writing to internal file - libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > What happens with 16 threads? % gfc -fopenmp pr83948.f90 % setenv OMP_NUM_THREADS 16 % ./a.out Table element number = 995 Same pole re-projecting area source: Beginnng of new record:

[Bug libfortran/83948] Thread safety issue writing to internal file - libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948 --- Comment #3 from Bill Long --- What happens with 16 threads?

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

cc Target: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../../gcc-7-branch/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --with-cpu=power7 --disable-multilib --with-long-double-128 --prefix=/home/willschm/gcc/install/gcc-7-branch --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.2.1 2018

[Bug fortran/83999] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 --- Comment #3 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Jakub, I have made the changes to the types of the dtype elements that you suggested. It led to a cast being needed in trans-intrinsic.c(gfc_conv_intrinsic_rank) but, apart from

[Bug target/84014] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in setup_min_max_allocno_live_range_point, at ira-build.c:2762

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84014 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Jan 24 19:45:55 2018 New Revision: 257029 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257029=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-24 Vladimir Makarov PR target/84014

[Bug libstdc++/83906] [8 Regression] Random FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/80276.cc whatis p4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906 --- Comment #13 from Pedro Alves --- Fix is now in GDB's master, 8.1, and 8.0 branches.

[Bug target/83845] [8 regression] new failures after r256620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83845 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- FWIW, I now have patches that fix all the big-endian SVE failures. Hope to post them later this week.

[Bug middle-end/83889] [8 regression] new failures on some arm targets after r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83889 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/83979] [8 Regression] ICE with pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83979 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/81601] [7/8 Regression] incorrect Warray-bounds warning with -fsanitize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81601 --- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 43233 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43233=edit WIP that fixes PR, but causes other regressions I am attaching a proof of concept hack that fixes this PR by moving

[Bug middle-end/84029] New: Partially inline strcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84029 Bug ID: 84029 Summary: Partially inline strcmp Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug fortran/82207] ieee_class identifies signaling NaNs as quiet NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- n Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:38:10PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 > > --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at

[Bug target/84014] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in setup_min_max_allocno_live_range_point, at ira-build.c:2762

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84014 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thank you for reporting. The problem occurs when only one subreg (obj) of register (allocno) is used in a function. I'll work on a patch.

[Bug c++/83990] [7/8 Regression] Spurious "potential null pointer dereference" warning regression from 7.1 onwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/84028] [nvptx] nested-function-1.f90 hangs at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84028 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc Target|

[Bug target/84028] New: [nvptx] nested-function-1.f90 hangs at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84028 Bug ID: 84028 Summary: [nvptx] nested-function-1.f90 hangs at -O1 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/82968] gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 fails at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82968 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82007] DTIO write format stored in a string leads to severe errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Should I backport this to 7? IMO yes.

[Bug libfortran/83948] Thread safety issue writing to internal file - libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83948 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83368] alloca after setjmp breaks PIC base reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83368 --- Comment #19 from James Clarke --- Thanks for the fix; is this a candidate for backporting to the gcc-7 branch? If not we can just carry it in Debian, but it would be nicer to have it upstream.

[Bug libstdc++/83906] [8 Regression] Random FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/80276.cc whatis p4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906 --- Comment #12 from Pedro Alves --- GDB fix posted here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-01/msg00482.html

[Bug fortran/83939] Constraint C1290 (elemental function cannot be allocatable) not enforced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83939 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/83692] Rejects valid constexpr with unrelated code fixing problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83692 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Seems like in C++17 the condition in if (m_x.value() != 1) throw 0; gets evaluated to 1 instead of 0, so we try to evaluate the "throw 0" but that can't be evaluated to a constant value. Maybe some

[Bug fortran/83980] Various issues with character length in array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83980 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/83823] [8 Regression] Character length issues with PACK()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83823 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83990] [7/8 Regression] Spurious "potential null pointer dereference" warning regression from 7.1 onwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990 --- Comment #3 from Tony E Lewis --- Just to be clear... I don't think it's _necessarily_ a problem that the warning is being triggered in this particular context (because I'm not in a position to judge that). The core problem I wish to

[Bug c++/84027] New: new-expression does not accept an attribute-specifier-seq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84027 Bug ID: 84027 Summary: new-expression does not accept an attribute-specifier-seq Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/82514] [8 Regression] ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:749

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Further reduced: template void i(h) { } template void n() { [] { struct p { }; i(p{}); }; } auto f = n<1>;

[Bug middle-end/83977] [8 Regression] ICE in simd_clone_clauses_extract, at omp-simd-clone.c:184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83977 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 24 16:28:47 2018 New Revision: 257023 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257023=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/83977 * tree.c (free_lang_data_in_decl): Don't clear

[Bug c++/83979] [8 Regression] ICE with pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83979 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Jan 24 16:22:30 2018 New Revision: 257021 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257021=gcc=rev Log: Fix use of boolean_true/false_node (PR 83979) r255913 changed

[Bug middle-end/83889] [8 regression] new failures on some arm targets after r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83889 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Jan 24 16:22:40 2018 New Revision: 257022 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257022=gcc=rev Log: Remove explicit dg-do runs from gcc.dg/vect (PR 83889) The

[Bug target/81535] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c fails starting with r250442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Just an FYI that the output of this test case changed a bit somewhere in the range r256987 to r257017: Now it gets this: FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr79439.c scan-assembler-times \\mbl g\\M 1

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Thanks! -flto makes differnce even for single file benchmarks (because of thrown away type info and extra info from linker). So perhaps that is reason why it did not reproduce?

[Bug target/84010] [sparc64] Problematic TLS code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84010 --- Comment #5 from James Clarke --- My patch seems to work for this case: sethi %tie_hi22(tcg_ctx), %g2 ... add %g2, %tie_lo10(tcg_ctx), %g1 ldx [%l7 + %g1], %g1, %tie_ldx(tcg_ctx) stx %g2,

[Bug fortran/83976] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83976 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84007] ICE with same_type_as with CLASS entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84007 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84006] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/82207] ieee_class identifies signaling NaNs as quiet NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:53:40AM +, guez at lmd dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 > > --- Comment #8 from Lionel GUEZ --- > It does not seem completely true that

[Bug c++/83990] [7/8 Regression] Spurious "potential null pointer dereference" warning regression from 7.1 onwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83990 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > mgrid also on AMD Fam10: > https://gcc.opensuse.org/gcc-old/SPEC/CFP/sb-megrez-head-64/recent.html Interesting about this regression is that mgrid is a single

[Bug c++/83796] [6/7/8 Regression] Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/82249] [8 Regression] wrong mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82249 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82249] [8 Regression] wrong mismatched argument pack lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82249 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 24 15:20:53 2018 New Revision: 257018 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257018=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82249 - wrong mismatched pack length error. * pt.c

[Bug fortran/84008] [PDT] ICE accessing kind and len parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84008 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- mgrid also on AMD Fam10: https://gcc.opensuse.org/gcc-old/SPEC/CFP/sb-megrez-head-64/recent.html

[Bug c++/84026] New: invalid 'unnamed scoped enum is not allowed' when scoped enum has a full qualified-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84026 Bug ID: 84026 Summary: invalid 'unnamed scoped enum is not allowed' when scoped enum has a full qualified-id Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/84011] Optimize switch table with run-time relocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 > > H.J. Lu changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug c++/83993] [7/8 Regression] ICE: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/84011] Optimize switch table with run-time relocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/84011] Optimize switch table with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com Depends on|

[Bug debug/83758] ICE building gccgo on powerpc64le --with-cpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758 --- Comment #21 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #19) > I was copied, presumably because the problem occurred in var-tracking. > > I've tried to duplicate the problem on gcc112. I bootstrapped the trunk

[Bug testsuite/84023] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-8.c fail with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84023 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I think that's probably spurious: > > void > set () > { > a=nan(""); > } > ... > float a = move (1); > if (!__builtin_constant_p (a)) > __builtin_abort ();

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/83589] [nvptx] mode-transitions.c and private-variables.{c,f90} execution FAILs at GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83589 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84025] New: [nvptx] Don't generate branch-around-nothing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84025 Bug ID: 84025 Summary: [nvptx] Don't generate branch-around-nothing Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/84011] Optimize switch table with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > > The question is why run-time relocations aren't allowed. > > Probably added to save binary space? An optimization would be to I don't think so: text

[Bug target/83589] [nvptx] mode-transitions.c and private-variables.{c,f90} execution FAILs at GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83589 --- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed Jan 24 13:52:12 2018 New Revision: 257016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257016=gcc=rev Log: [nvptx, PR83589] Workaround for branch-around-nothing JIT bug 2018-01-24 Tom de

[Bug middle-end/84019] [7/8 regression] ICE in fold-const of std::complex division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/2018] Sqrt causes ice in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:2718

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2018 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed Jan 24 13:52:12 2018 New Revision: 257016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257016=gcc=rev Log: [nvptx, PR83589] Workaround for branch-around-nothing JIT bug 2018-01-24 Tom de

[Bug tree-optimization/83992] wrong debug info: wrong NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_BEG placement causes TestCrashDumpsAllThreads gotools testcase failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83992 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Corresponding C testcase would be something like: static inline void foo (void) { int j; while (1) for (j = 0; j < 0x7fff; ++j) ; } int main () { foo (); } at -O2 -g

[Bug middle-end/84024] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in operator>, at profile-count.h:855

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84024 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/84011] Optimize switch table with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 > > --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) >

[Bug target/84011] Optimize switch table with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- This patch works on the testcase: diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c index c2538908340..a1e85407bf3 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c +++

[Bug tree-optimization/83992] wrong debug info: wrong NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_BEG placement causes TestCrashDumpsAllThreads gotools testcase failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83992 --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor --- In this case the problem happens before the assembler. The bad location information shows up in reemit_insn_block_notes in gcc/final.c. As the first insn in the block has no location,

[Bug target/84011] Optimize switch table with -fPIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Somehow switch-conversion doesn't transform the switch with -f{PIE,PIC}. > Without > we get > > phy_modes (phy_interface_t interface) > { > const char * _1; >

[Bug middle-end/84019] [7/8 regression] ICE in fold-const of std::complex division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84019 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >