https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84804
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84806
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
Bug ID: 84826
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84812
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
Felix Fietkau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nbd at nbd dot name
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
Bug ID: 84829
Summary: -mieee-fp causes to link with -lieee but that is no
longer available
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0.1
Target Milestone|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
--- Comment #3 from linzj ---
From the function destructor
~_Function_base()
{
if (_M_manager)
_M_manager(_M_functor, _M_functor, __destroy_functor);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
GCC 8 has the patch now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84777
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 12 08:45:54 2018
New Revision: 258444
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258444=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-03-12 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clm at codesourcery dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84813
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 12 09:02:36 2018
New Revision: 258445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258445=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/84813
* g++.dg/debug/pr84813.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84811
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
This looks an ICE on invalid code though since the ODR is violated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Simplified testcase for the testsuite:
/* PR target/84786 */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-mavx512f -mno-avx512vl -O2" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target avx512f } */
#include "avx512f-check.h"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So the reason is that data-ref analysis doesn't consider
# VUSE <.MEM_20>
_12 = MEM[(char *)"" + 1B];
as a load. It's an out-of-bound read which we don't fold optimistically
or replace with a trap.
At
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84825
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84825
Bug ID: 84825
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in rebuild_frequencies, at
predict.c:4002
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84828
Bug ID: 84828
Summary: ICE in verify_flow_info at gcc/cfghooks.c:265
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
--- Comment #5 from linzj ---
Change the function call to printf to asm like:
int main() {
// printf("%d", getFunc(1)(1, 1));
asm volatile(""
:
: "r"(getFunc(1)(1, 1)));
return 0;
}
Will generate the concise code.
I think
# USE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84799
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
--- Comment #2 from linzj ---
Okay, it's std::_Function_base::_Base_manager
>::_M_manager(std::_Any_data &, const std::_Any_data &,
std::_Manager_operation) (__dest=..., __source=...,
__op=std::__destroy_functor)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84808
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84830
Bug ID: 84830
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at
tree-ssa-pre.c:2388
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84822
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Probably related to PR59948, PR81000, etc. (I didn't look closely)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84820
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84827
Bug ID: 84827
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84804
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
looks like it is working with r258445.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 12 12:32:28 2018
New Revision: 258446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258446=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-03-12 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84801
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> diff -upbd of that for better readability.
>
> --- gcc/stmt.c.jj 2018-01-03 10:19:55.150533956 +0100
> +++ gcc/stmt.c2018-03-12 13:25:03.790733765 +0100
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r202540. Before that:
error: parameter declared ‘auto’
constexpr auto x = S::value;
^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
Bug ID: 84831
Summary: Invalid memory read in parse_output_constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84812
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84804
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43630
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43630=edit
gcc8-pr84831.patch
Untested fix (large only because of the reindentation).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84802
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 12 12:58:38 2018
New Revision: 258447
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258447=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/84802 - ICE capturing uninstantiated class.
* lambda.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r238696.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84786
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43628
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43628=edit
gcc8-pr84786.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84808
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43629
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43629=edit
gcc8-pr84808.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
We have an ordering issue because of forward declarations:
class XclImpRoot : XclRoot {};
class XclImpColRowSettings : XclImpRoot {};
register_odr_type called on XclImpRoot causes get_odr_type to assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84811
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84753
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Looks like Peter was able to help you on the binutils forum over the weekend.
Thanks, Peter!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84831
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84778
--- Comment #3 from david.applegate at woodplc dot com ---
Thanks for the reply and the clarification.
I have two comments to make regarding this if I may...
1) Previous gfortran compilers were happy with the code. I also tested g95 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm, the epilogue expansion in arm.md hits the HAVE_return path and does:
emit_jump_insn (gen_return ());
with a comment saying:
/* HAVE_return is testing for USE_RETURN_INSN (FALSE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84803
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84799
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That patch has been reverted in r258415.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84783
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Peryt ---
Oh, ok I see now version in report. Sorry, my mistake. It was added to trunk
and not backported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer ---
Does -mieee-fp still impact code generation on i386? What about x86-64 with
SSE2?
I would expect that existing users of -mieee-fp receive an error when they
compile and link with a upgraded glibc, so I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-mieee-fp does affect code generation on x86 and m68k, but I don't see how it
is related to any changes in glibc.
And besides code generation changes it affects whether -lieee is linked in or
not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84778
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:16:19AM +, david.applegate at woodplc dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84778
>
> --- Comment #3 from david.applegate at woodplc dot com ---
> Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84834
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r243255.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84836
Bug ID: 84836
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in pop_local_binding, at
cp/name-lookup.c:2054
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Mar 12 18:04:16 2018
New Revision: 258455
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258455=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83456 - -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping
memcpy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84774
Bug 84774 depends on bug 83456, which changed state.
Bug 83456 Summary: -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy in an
inline function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84836
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84834
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83939
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Mar 12 18:15:42 2018
New Revision: 258456
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258456=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-03-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84834
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84485
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[6 Regression] Vectorising
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84676
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84806
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'd say the right thing is to keep libieee.a around, even if it will be an
empty ar archive.
GCC is not the linker and doesn't have the library search logic the linker has,
so it is hard to add -lieee for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84799
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84820
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84802
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45616
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84792
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r208157.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84799
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Mar 12 13:32:44 2018
New Revision: 258448
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258448=gcc=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR 84799
This was introduced by r258390 and fixed by
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo