[Bug c++/84881] New: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:968 when building for gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84881 Bug ID: 84881 Summary: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:968 when building for gnueabihf Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/84880] [8 Regression] libgfortran fail to build on aarch64/arm 32bit cross toolchain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84880 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Priority|P3

[Bug debug/84875] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84875 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |6.5 Summary|[8 Regression]

[Bug debug/84875] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84875 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug middle-end/70359] [6/7/8 Regression] Code size increase for x86/ARM/others compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #39 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #38) > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 > > > > --- Comment #37 from Aldy

[Bug debug/84875] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84875 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I don't have my bisect s390x seed built with checking, but from the generated code I think this started with r207605.

[Bug libfortran/84880] New: [libgfortran] libgfortran fail to build on aarch64/arm 32bit cross toolchain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84880 Bug ID: 84880 Summary: [libgfortran] libgfortran fail to build on aarch64/arm 32bit cross toolchain Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug gcov-profile/84879] GCOV tool crash when invoked for intermediate format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84879 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/84879] New: GCOV tool crash when invoked for intermediate format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84879 Bug ID: 84879 Summary: GCOV tool crash when invoked for intermediate format Product: gcc Version: unknown URL: https://github.com/linux-test-project/lcov/issues/38#i

[Bug middle-end/84877] Local stack copy of BLKmode parameter on the stack is not aligned when the requested alignment exceeds MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I think GCC needs to copy P0 to a properly aligned stack slot in the prologue.

[Bug tree-optimization/82847] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82847 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/70359] [6/7/8 Regression] Code size increase for x86/ARM/others compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #38 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 > > --- Comment #37 from Aldy Hernandez --- > Hi Richi. > > (In reply to

[Bug target/84876] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in lra_assign at gcc/lra-assigns.c:1601 since r258504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84876 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/84876] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in lra_assign at gcc/lra-assigns.c:1601 since r258504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84876 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/70359] [6/7/8 Regression] Code size increase for x86/ARM/others compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #37 from Aldy Hernandez --- Hi Richi. (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #31) > I'd have not restricted the out-of-loop IV use to IV +- CST but > instead did the transform > > + LOOP: > + # p_8 = PHI

[Bug target/84711] AArch32 big-endian fails when taking subreg of a vector mode to a scalar mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84711 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/76957] [7/8/9 Regression] XFAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-dsyr2k.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "number of SCoPs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76957 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||deferred Target Milestone|8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/64715] [6/7/8/9 Regression] __builtin_object_size (..., 1) fails to locate subobject

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||deferred Target Milestone|8.0

[Bug middle-end/63184] [6/7/8/9 Regression] Fails to simplify comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63184 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||deferred Target Milestone|8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/56049] [7/8/9 Regression] Simplification to constants not done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||deferred Target Milestone|8.0

[Bug c++/84874] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43664 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43664=edit gcc8-pr84874.patch Full untested patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/39612] [6/7/8/9 Regression] LIM inserts loads from uninitialized local memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||deferred Target Milestone|8.0

[Bug c++/66672] std::is_same wrong result for captured reference value inside a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66672 Anders Schau Knatten changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anders at knatten dot org ---

[Bug target/84711] AArch32 big-endian fails when taking subreg of a vector mode to a scalar mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84711 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84711] AArch32 big-endian fails when taking subreg of a vector mode to a scalar mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84711 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina --- Author: tnfchris Date: Thu Mar 15 10:53:17 2018 New Revision: 258554 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258554=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-15 Tamar Christina PR

[Bug target/84878] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in add_cross_iteration_register_deps)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84878 Bug ID: 84878 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in add_cross_iteration_register_deps) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84874] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase: struct A { const char *a, *b; }; struct B { struct A c; }; void foo (B *x) { *x = { .c = { .b = "" } }; } *x = B { .c = { .b = "" } }; instead of *x = { .c = { .b = "" } }; works

[Bug fortran/81304] [6 Regression] Bogus warning with -Wsurprising and -fopenmp: Type specified for intrinsic function 'min' / 'max'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81304 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for fixing, Jakub! Will you backport to gcc-6-branch as well?

[Bug middle-end/84877] Local stack copy of BLKmode parameter on the stack is not aligned when the requested alignment exceeds MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-none-eabi

[Bug fortran/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

|2147483647 --- Comment #28 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- With a current trunk (gcc version 8.0.1 20180315 / trunk revision 258550), I don't see the warnings on comment 0 and comment 3 any more. I do see them with gcc version 7.2.0 (Ubuntu 7.2.0-1ubuntu1~16.04), but I haven't

[Bug middle-end/84877] New: Local stack copy of BLKmode parameter on the stack is not aligned when the requested alignment exceeds MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877 Bug ID: 84877 Summary: Local stack copy of BLKmode parameter on the stack is not aligned when the requested alignment exceeds MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT Product: gcc

[Bug target/68256] Defining TARGET_USE_CONSTANT_BLOCKS_P causes go bootstrap failure on aarch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68256 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84876] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in lra_assign at gcc/lra-assigns.c:1601 since r258504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84876 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug c/84873] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 > > --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Why the > + if (TREE_CODE

[Bug c/84873] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Why the + if (TREE_CODE (*op1_p) == INTEGER_CST) + *op1_p = fold_convert (unsigned_type_node, *op1_p); + else + *op1_p = build1 (NOP_EXPR, unsigned_type_node,

[Bug c/84873] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug c++/84874] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug c/84873] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[7/8 Regression]

[Bug c/84873] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, |

[Bug c++/84874] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- ICEs likely since r185587, before it has been rejected: pr84874.C: In function ‘void sema_init(semaphore*)’: pr84874.C:30:2: error: no match for ‘operator=’ in ‘* sem = 0}}, {"(*sem).lock"}}}’

[Bug target/84876] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in lra_assign at gcc/lra-assigns.c:1601 since r258504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84876 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-3-15 CC|

[Bug target/84876] New: [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in lra_assign at gcc/lra-assigns.c:1601 since r258504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84876 Bug ID: 84876 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in lra_assign at gcc/lra-assigns.c:1601 since r258504 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/84873] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Or rather it looks like a tree sharing issue. The COND_EXPR is created via fold_binary_op_with_conditional_arg when folding (unsigned int) (long int) (1.0e+0 +

[Bug c++/84874] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug debug/84875] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84875 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/84873] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug debug/84875] New: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84875 Bug ID: 84875 Summary: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 on s390x Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84874] New: internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84874 Bug ID: 84874 Summary: internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5800 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84824] DCE fails to remove dead code of std::function constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824 --- Comment #7 from linzj --- The core of this problem is escaped result is function wise, not block wise, or instruction wise. Any place in the function the local variable escapes, will count that variable as escaped. Actually the printf does

[Bug rtl-optimization/84872] [8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at cfgloopmanip.c:1536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84873] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84811] ICE on valid code at -O3 in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:355

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84811 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #6) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > > > gcc version 8.0.1 20180310 (experimental) [trunk revision 258413] (GCC) > > > > Just a nit, this revision

[Bug target/68256] Defining TARGET_USE_CONSTANT_BLOCKS_P causes go bootstrap failure on aarch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68256 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 15 08:55:04 2018 New Revision: 258553 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258553=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-15 Vladimir Mezentsev PR

[Bug target/84860] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84860 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug target/84860] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84860 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 15 08:35:28 2018 New Revision: 258552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258552=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84860 * optabs.c (emit_conditional_move): Pass address of

[Bug c/84853] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE: |[7 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c/84853] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 15 07:37:53 2018 New Revision: 258550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258550=gcc=rev Log: PR c/84853 * c-typeck.c (build_binary_op) : If code1 is

<    1   2