[Bug rtl-optimization/88001] ASMCONS cannot handle properly UNSPEC(CONST)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 45210 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45210=edit proposed patch

[Bug target/88425] suboptimal code for a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88425 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 11 14:50:22 2018 New Revision: 267023 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267023=gcc=rev Log: PR target/88425 * config/i386/i386.md (*x86_movcc_0_m1_neg_leu):

[Bug c/87950] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch cases are completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87950 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/88454] [9 regression] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-5.c fails after r266971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88454 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/86049] Array bindings are not const when initializer is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049 Tomalak Geret'kal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at kera dot name --- Comment #3

[Bug ada/88429] Ada bootstrap fails with --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/88429] Ada bootstrap fails with --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/86049] Array bindings are not const when initializer is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Richard, do you know if there's an issue for this yet?

[Bug c++/87603] [C++17] noexcept isn't special cased for constant expressions anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87603 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldionne.2 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/88453] GCC pretends that constexpr default-constructible type is nothrow constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88453 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/87957] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in warn_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:1051 since r265519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957 --- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka --- Yeap, the warnings was written at the time all C++ types had TYPE_NAMEs and other types used IDENTIFIER_NODE. I have chnaged it for memory use reaosns so only main variants have IDENTIFIER_NODE. Usually we

[Bug testsuite/88454] New: [9 regression] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-5.c fails after r266971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88454 Bug ID: 88454 Summary: [9 regression] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-5.c fails after r266971 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/88444] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in live_on_edge, at tree-vrp.c:468; or ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in get_val

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88444 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 11 17:16:48 2018 New Revision: 267026 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267026=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/88444 * tree-vrp.c

[Bug fortran/88452] gfortran (Gentoo 8.2.0-r5 p1.6) 8.2.0 reports internal error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88452 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88375] Vague source location for bad initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88375 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/88416] [8/9 Regression] ICE in in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3013

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88416 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/88453] New: GCC pretends that constexpr default-constructible type is nothrow constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88453 Bug ID: 88453 Summary: GCC pretends that constexpr default-constructible type is nothrow constructible Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/88434] operator< should take precedence over template argument in basic.lookup.classref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88434 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Giese --- It appears there is a CWG issue for this: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1835

[Bug rtl-optimization/88001] ASMCONS cannot handle properly UNSPEC(CONST)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Claudiu: could you test that patch please? (On the real thing, not just this testcase :-) )

[Bug fortran/88455] False positive for allocatable character array of deferred length, ALLOCATE using SOURCE/MOLD [-Wuninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455 --- Comment #2 from Adam Hirst --- Slightly reduced - the issue occurs even in the MAIN program: program test implicit none integer :: a, b, c character(:), allocatable :: line(:) a = 1; b = 10; c = 30

[Bug fortran/88249] ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88249 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Dec 12 00:08:12 2018 New Revision: 267037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267037=gcc=rev Log: 2018-12-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88249 *

[Bug fortran/88249] ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88249 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/65725] Bootstrap errors on Solaris 10 x86-64, including object diffs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65725 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Richard G. --- Hello Rainer, (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #7) > That bootstrap (amd64-pc-solaris2.10 with as/ld, --disable-shared > --with-pic) has now completed as well: in addition to

[Bug fortran/88155] ICE in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88155 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Dec 12 00:53:08 2018 New Revision: 267041 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267041=gcc=rev Log: 2018-12-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88155 *

[Bug fortran/88455] False positive for allocatable character array of deferred length, ALLOCATE using SOURCE/MOLD [-Wuninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455 --- Comment #1 from Adam Hirst --- I'm not sure whether they're related, but I found a handful of potentially-similar bugs, which might be worth collating here for quicker reference. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28660

[Bug middle-end/86979] [9 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 with -m32 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86979 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/53714] false positive for -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53714 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88249] ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88249 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Dec 11 23:39:43 2018 New Revision: 267036 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267036=gcc=rev Log: 2018-12-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88249 *

[Bug tree-optimization/88440] size optimization of memcpy-like code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88440 --- Comment #3 from krux --- Adding -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns to -Os does not seem to make a difference though.

[Bug other/88456] New: __atomic_compare_exchange implementation inconsistently used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88456 Bug ID: 88456 Summary: __atomic_compare_exchange implementation inconsistently used Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/88375] Vague source location for bad initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88375 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm

[Bug ada/88429] Ada bootstrap fails with --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Dec 11 23:04:39 2018 New Revision: 267034 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267034=gcc=rev Log: libada/ PR ada/88429 * configure.ac (default_gnatlib_target):

[Bug c++/86608] [7/8 Regression] volatile variable is taken as a constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86608 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88155] ICE in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88155 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/88155] ICE in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88155 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Dec 12 01:26:12 2018 New Revision: 267043 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267043=gcc=rev Log: 2018-12-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88155 *

[Bug target/83562] broken destructors of thread_local objects on i686 mingw targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83562 --- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira --- This can easily be fixed by way of a trampoline that adjusts the parameter.

[Bug fortran/88455] False positive for allocatable character array of deferred length, ALLOCATE using SOURCE/MOLD [-Wuninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug ada/88429] [9 regression] libada build fails with --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88429 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88249] ICE in gfc_resolve_filepos, at fortran/io.c:2853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88249 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Dec 11 23:13:19 2018 New Revision: 267035 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267035=gcc=rev Log: 2018-12-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88249 *

[Bug fortran/88455] New: False positive for allocatable character array of deferred length, ALLOCATE using SOURCE/MOLD [-Wuninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88455 Bug ID: 88455 Summary: False positive for allocatable character array of deferred length, ALLOCATE using SOURCE/MOLD [-Wuninitialized] Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/77385] "Unclassifiable statement" from gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77385 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88155] ICE in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88155 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Dec 12 01:14:58 2018 New Revision: 267042 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267042=gcc=rev Log: 2018-12-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/88155 *

[Bug c++/86608] [7/8/9 Regression] volatile variable is taken as a constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86608 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Dec 11 18:53:03 2018 New Revision: 267030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267030=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86608 - reading constexpr volatile variable. *

[Bug c++/87951] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch is completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87951 --- Comment #17 from Vitali --- I was explicitly asked to open this as a separate bug in comment #7 of 87950. Would be helpful if the GCC devs could coordinate to figure out if they want separate bugs for C/C++ or 1 bug. Jonathan, on this forum

[Bug target/88435] Compiling with optimizations causes the compiler to fail.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88435 Mattis Lind changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80520] [7/8/9 Regression] Performance regression from missing if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80520 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 11 20:28:35 2018 New Revision: 267031 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267031=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/80520 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-11.c

[Bug c++/86049] Array bindings are not const when initializer is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86049 --- Comment #5 from Richard Smith --- This was just reported as http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2018/12/5320.php; I don't believe it's on the core issues list yet. [@Tomalak, I think the standard is clear here: "If the assignment-expression in

[Bug c++/87861] [9 regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5165

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87861 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 11 20:37:53 2018 New Revision: 267032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267032=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/87861 * class.c (build_vtbl_initializer): For

[Bug ipa/87957] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in warn_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:1051 since r265519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957 --- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou --- > I guess the middle-end relies on TYPE_NAME to have the TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT > type rather than be qualified. The question if just here and it is possible > to cope with that, or elsewhere too. Yes, but

[Bug c++/88434] [DR1835] operator< should take precedence over template argument in basic.lookup.classref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88434 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug testsuite/37703] Ada testsuites lack multilib support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37703 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/88001] ASMCONS cannot handle properly UNSPEC(CONST)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001 Vineet Gupta changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vgupta at synopsys dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/88116] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_convert_constant(): Unexpected type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88116 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/51509] Inefficient neon intrinsic code sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/88001] ASMCONS cannot handle properly UNSPEC(CONST)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001 --- Comment #6 from Claudiu Zissulescu --- The dejagnu tests for ARC look alright. No extra failures.

[Bug c/26732] different argument type not rejected for K style function definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26732 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > Now we don't even error out at -O3. Why would the -O3 matter?

[Bug tree-optimization/81811] missing -Wreturn-local-addr returning strcpy result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81811 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/87951] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch is completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87951 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug bootstrap/59447] --with-dwarf2 should be documented as meaning "DWARF 2 or later" instead of just "DWARF 2"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59447 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/88457] New: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88457 Bug ID: 88457 Summary: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/79593] [7/8/9 Regression] Poor/Worse code generation for FPU on versions after 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593 --- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law --- We have this after IRA: (insn 27 26 28 4 (set (reg:DI 101 [ pretmp_22 ]) (zero_extend:DI (subreg:SI (reg:SF 91 [ pretmp_22 ]) 0))) "j.C":20:35 114 {*zero_extendsidi2} (expr_list:REG_DEAD

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/88442] Misleading error message with duplicated struct definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88442 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/87951] GCC warns about reaching end of non-void function when all switch is completely handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87951 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #14) > This is a duplicate of bug 87950, with most of the same discussion. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87950 *** I think I need to add

[Bug middle-end/88448] [9 regression] gnat.dg/opt66.adb etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88447] Non-contiguous array argument of some class not passed properly to subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88447 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/88438] [F08] A pointer function reference can denote a variable in any variable definition context.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88438 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/88134] ICE in create_component_ref_by_pieces_1, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2520

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 --- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha --- Could your r266973 fix a root cause of this issue?

[Bug c++/88445] noexcept(expr) should return true with -fno-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88445 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/86004] [9 regression] Several lto test cases begin failing with r260963

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 11 10:28:39 2018 New Revision: 266974 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266974=gcc=rev Log: PR lto/86004 * doc/sourcebuild.texi (lto_incremental): Document

[Bug target/88134] ICE in create_component_ref_by_pieces_1, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2520

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- I cannot get that to fail either, with a trunk compiler :-/

[Bug target/88134] ICE in create_component_ref_by_pieces_1, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2520

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- AT12.0 however, like on godbolt, does in fact crash.

[Bug tree-optimization/88444] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in live_on_edge, at tree-vrp.c:468; or ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in get_val

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88444 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug d/88431] link errors on build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88431 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- This config line works fine: ../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.266950 \ --disable-multilib \ --disable-werror \ --enable-checking=df,extra,fold,rtl,yes \

[Bug middle-end/88448] [9 regression] gnat.dg/opt66.adb etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug middle-end/88448] New: [9 regression] gnat.dg/opt66.adb etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88448 Bug ID: 88448 Summary: [9 regression] gnat.dg/opt66.adb etc. FAIL Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/83377] Missed optimization (x86): Bit operations should be converted to arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83377 --- Comment #3 from Vinay Kumar --- The below mentioned pattern match in match.pd generates the assembly code similar to subtraction. == diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd index fbb4d6f..3cde6a6

[Bug target/88134] ICE in create_component_ref_by_pieces_1, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2520

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- Aha. Segher, you've helpfully reminded me about -msoft-float w/ your recent commit. So it's not (solely) my misconfiguration once again: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/sshcIF (it's g++, because gcc for powerpc

[Bug target/88134] ICE in create_component_ref_by_pieces_1, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2520

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, asolokha at gmx dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 > > --- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha --- > Could your r266973 fix a root cause of

[Bug libstdc++/88204] New test case 26_numerics/complex/operators/more_constexpr.cc from r266416 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88204 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*,powerpc-*-ai

[Bug target/88134] ICE in create_component_ref_by_pieces_1, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2520

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 --- Comment #13 from Arseny Solokha --- In decl_address_invariant_p() we hit this break: 3423 case VAR_DECL: 3424 if ((TREE_STATIC (op) || DECL_EXTERNAL (op))

[Bug tree-optimization/88459] New: vectorization failure for a simple sum reduction loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88459 Bug ID: 88459 Summary: vectorization failure for a simple sum reduction loop Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/88450] ICE in stage 2 compiler while configuring libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88450 --- Comment #1 from Bence Szabó --- Correction: 9-21081118 works after patching with "PR bootstrap/88106" (r266309)

[Bug middle-end/86979] [9 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 with -m32 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86979 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/88458] New: Conditional expression where the second and third operand are int and nullptr treated as ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88458 Bug ID: 88458 Summary: Conditional expression where the second and third operand are int and nullptr treated as ill-formed Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/88440] size optimization of memcpy-like code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88440 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/88445] New: noexcept(expr) should return true with -fno-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88445 Bug ID: 88445 Summary: noexcept(expr) should return true with -fno-exceptions Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/88444] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in live_on_edge, at tree-vrp.c:468; or ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in get_val

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88444 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- We end up with non-folded statement _22 = (long int) 0; because of all the disabled and enabled optimizations (IPA-VRP propagated constant not cleaned up). I think: --- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj 2018-12-07

[Bug target/88145] ICE: unrecognizable insn (mffs) targeting 32-bit BE FPU-less powerpc CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88145 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Dec 11 08:30:36 2018 New Revision: 266973 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266973=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Don't use rs6000_isa_flags_explicit for soft float tests (PR88145)

[Bug c++/88446] New: __builtin_is_constant_evaluated rejects some converted constant expressions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88446 Bug ID: 88446 Summary: __builtin_is_constant_evaluated rejects some converted constant expressions. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ipa/87957] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in warn_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:1051 since r265519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/87957] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in warn_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:1051 since r265519

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87957 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou --- > The problem is here ^^^ I think, i.e. we have a volatile variant. The > problem may come from the Ada front-end, but it would be nice to have Jan's > viewpoint. It comes from libgnarl/s-tpobop.ads:

[Bug target/88134] ICE in create_component_ref_by_pieces_1, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2520

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88134 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/88433] wrong code for printf after a pointer cast from a pointer to an adjacent object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88433 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/88447] Non-contiguous array argument of some class not passed properly to subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88447 --- Comment #1 from martin --- Here is a smaller reproducer. The component "integer :: i" in type t is necessary to reproduce the bug. module mod implicit none private public qv type, public :: s real, dimension(1:3) :: vec end type s

[Bug c++/88445] noexcept(expr) should return true with -fno-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88445 --- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin --- Hm... This was discussed in Clang and looks like such optimization could break ABI and cause ODR violations https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27442#c4 If nothing changed since then, I'm OK with closin

[Bug testsuite/88436] [9 regression] r265421 causes gcc.target/powerpc/pr54240.c to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88436 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/88446] __builtin_is_constant_evaluated rejects some converted constant expressions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88446 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88447] New: Non-contiguous array argument of some class not passed properly to subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88447 Bug ID: 88447 Summary: Non-contiguous array argument of some class not passed properly to subroutine Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/88434] operator< should take precedence over template argument in basic.lookup.classref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88434 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

  1   2   >