[Bug fortran/43062] NAMELIST attribute conflicts with ALLOCATABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062 --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 06:44:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) Interpretation request for the June J3 meeting: http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/192/10-146.txt Proposed edit is to allow

[Bug libmudflap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339 --- Comment #19 from Gabor Z. Papp gzp at papp dot hu 2010-10-02 06:56:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) make configure-target-libmudflap make: *** No rule to make target `configure-target-libmudflap'. Stop.

[Bug libmudflap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339 --- Comment #20 from Gabor Z. Papp gzp at papp dot hu 2010-10-02 06:58:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) make configure-target-libmudflap make: *** No rule to make target `configure-target-libmudflap'. Stop. My bad. I'm building gcc in

[Bug libmudflap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339 --- Comment #23 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 07:13:39 UTC --- The 'make configure-target-libmudflap' log you just sent does not show the 'expr syntax error' failures from the log.make in comment 1 any more. Can you

[Bug libmudflap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339 --- Comment #24 from Gabor Z. Papp gzp at papp dot hu 2010-10-02 07:17:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) The 'make configure-target-libmudflap' log you just sent does not show the 'expr syntax error' failures from the log.make in comment 1

[Bug fortran/42831] Unnecessary array temporary produced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42831 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 08:00:55 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Oct 2 08:00:50 2010 New Revision: 164900 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164900 Log: 2010-10-02 Thomas

[Bug fortran/42831] Unnecessary array temporary produced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42831 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/45748] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -fimplicit-none failures when using intrinsic MAX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/30409] [fortran] missed optimization with pure function arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 08:10:51 UTC --- Related to PR 45777.

[Bug other/38920] dw2 exceptions don't work.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38920 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug other/45864] New: system.h is crufty maybe? Raise the level fo ANSI C89?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45864 Summary: system.h is crufty maybe? Raise the level fo ANSI C89? Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug middle-end/44984] gcc passes unsigned instead of int for printf width/precision (warnings generated)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44984 --- Comment #3 from Jay jay.krell at cornell dot edu 2010-10-02 10:27:53 UTC --- which compiler produces this I'm afraid I'm not sure and can't quickly/easily make it happen again. Sorry.

[Bug java/45322] libjava error: libtool: compile: libobj name `ltdl.lo' may not contain shell special

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45322 --- Comment #7 from Jay jay.krell at cornell dot edu 2010-10-02 10:29:06 UTC --- It looks like the machine I was using might not be available any longer. Sorry.

[Bug fortran/45748] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -fimplicit-none failures when using intrinsic MAX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 10:38:45 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sat Oct 2 10:38:42 2010 New Revision: 164901 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164901 Log: 2010-10-02 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug java/45322] libjava error: libtool: compile: libobj name `ltdl.lo' may not contain shell special

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45322 Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339 Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 11:33:43 UTC --- Summary as far I understand it. Cf. http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-September/003852.html : module m procedure(), pointer :: p, p2 protected :: p

[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 11:39:45 UTC --- Author: rwild Date: Sat Oct 2 11:39:41 2010 New Revision: 164902 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164902 Log: Fix unportable shell

[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 11:40:35 UTC --- Author: rwild Date: Sat Oct 2 11:40:32 2010 New Revision: 164903 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164903 Log: Fix unportable shell

[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621 Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/36126] ICE: postreload.c:401

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36126 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libobjc/34315] libobjc warnings with Win64 target=x86_64-pc-mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34315 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/45794] [4.6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_procedure_call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45794 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 11:57:49 UTC --- I think this regression is due to r153793, which was Tobias' fix for PR41850. The reason for the ICE is that the formal argument mask of _gfortran_mmaxloc0_4_r4 has as =

[Bug debug/45865] New: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865 Summary: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/45866] New: std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 Summary: std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members. Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/45864] system.h is crufty maybe? Raise the level fo ANSI C89?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45864 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-02 12:10:46 UTC --- On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, jay.krell at cornell dot edu wrote: I recently found a compiler that didn't like spaces after the # in

[Bug c/45867] New: Sparc64: bogus %g4 reference in libgcc __udivti3()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45867 Summary: Sparc64: bogus %g4 reference in libgcc __udivti3() Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||45114 ---

[Bug debug/45865] [4.6 regression] Failed to build 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/45867] reference to %g4 in code generated for sparc64-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45867 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sparc64-elf

[Bug c++/44871] Invalid type mismatches while merging C and C++ sources

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44871 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-07-08 14:47:48 |2010-10-02

[Bug tree-optimization/44897] -fwhopr + ipa-sra misoptimize sqlite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-07-18 20:21:12 |2010-10-02

[Bug lto/45089] -Os -g -fwhopr dwarf2out ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45089 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-07-27 09:17:50 |2010-10-02

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 14:18:07 UTC --- We'll need to find out why stage1 gcc and stage2 gcc produce different output. To do that, the easiest thing to do is to copy object files from stage1 to

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 14:19:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Note: The problem not only applies to procedure pointers, but also to data pointers, as the following example shows: Well, at least this example

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/45746] [OOP] ICE in fold_convert_loc: pointer to allocatable array with select type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45746 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/45174] Make fails in zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45174 --- Comment #25 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 14:52:12 UTC --- Author: rwild Date: Sat Oct 2 14:52:07 2010 New Revision: 164904 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164904 Log: Allow to pass separate

[Bug bootstrap/45326] gmp's use of C99 keeps breaking my compiles, suggest set autoconf variables to avoid inttypes/stdint

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45326 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 14:52:12 UTC --- Author: rwild Date: Sat Oct 2 14:52:07 2010 New Revision: 164904 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164904 Log: Allow to pass separate

[Bug bootstrap/45868] New: --disable-shared --enable-static --enable-shared=libstdc++ doesn't build shared libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45868 Summary: --disable-shared --enable-static --enable-shared=libstdc++ doesn't build shared libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/45868] --disable-shared --enable-static --enable-shared=libstdc++ doesn't build shared libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45868 --- Comment #1 from Gabor Z. Papp gzp at papp dot hu 2010-10-02 15:03:55 UTC --- BTW somewhere I read, that shared libstdc++ needs shared libgcc_s.so, probably thats the problem, since this configuration build static libgcc_s only.

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug other/32998] -frecord-gcc-switches issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32998 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com 2010-10-02 16:06:39 UTC --- Wouldn't be appropriate to append these flags also/instead to DW_AT_producer? This way they get easily associated with the specific CU.

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-02 16:07:53 UTC --- We'll need to find out why stage1 gcc and stage2 gcc produce different output. To do that, the easiest thing to do is to copy object files from

[Bug bootstrap/42176] bootstrap fails while building libstdc++-v3 on debian sarge (related to cstdio and similar to #30915)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42176 --- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at gehrels dot info 2010-10-02 16:20:01 UTC --- I can confirm this bug using gentoo linux: uname -a Linux vadmin631 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 31 11:17:26 UTC 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600

[Bug bootstrap/42176] bootstrap fails while building libstdc++-v3 on debian sarge (related to cstdio and similar to #30915)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42176 --- Comment #3 from gcc-bugzilla at gehrels dot info 2010-10-02 16:22:48 UTC --- Oh, and, btw: The Version i was trying to compile was gcc-4.4.3

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 16:35:28 UTC --- The files between stage1 and stage2 are supposed to differ. What isn't supposed to differ (after stripping optional debug information) is stage2 and stage3,

[Bug tree-optimization/45649] -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations fail to recognize finite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45649 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2010-10-02 16:38:02 UTC --- gcc version 4.6.0 20101002 (experimental) [trunk revision 164903] (GCC) FAIL too

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/36150] colorize output of gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot

[Bug target/45820] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr45728.c at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 17:20:26 UTC --- Actually, the insn doesn't satisfy its constraints because %r31 should be %r1. Have a patch. This is an old regression caused by a change to

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #3 from Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net 2010-10-02 17:30:05 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 Manuel

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net 2010-10-02 17:32:08 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org Since gcc doesn't have caret or fix-it hints, my proposal is quite modest, just  color the

[Bug target/45820] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr45728.c at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 17:38:38 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Oct 2 17:38:35 2010 New Revision: 164905 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164905 Log: PR target/45820

[Bug target/42854] [4.4/4.5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/darwin-weakimport-[13].c scan-assembler-not *

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42854 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at

[Bug other/36150] colorize output of gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 17:52:39 UTC --- Somehow I missed this bug when searching. For those here in favour of color, clang has it and people love it [*]. Luckily, this is one of those clang

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 18:04:00 UTC --- my copy of GCC (under openSUSE) colors the output and let me customize the colors. That is quite system dependent. Getting the same stuff under

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 18:30:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org IDEs let users get the colors they want -if they ever wanted. The

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #7 from Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net 2010-10-02 18:35:26 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:04 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org he environment.  How far should we go to emulate an IDE? So how does it work in openSUSE? Do

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #8 from Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net 2010-10-02 18:41:28 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:30 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 ---

[Bug c/45869] New: type mismatch in shift expression produces ice with -O3 and -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45869 Summary: type mismatch in shift expression produces ice with -O3 and -m32 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/45869] type mismatch in shift expression produces ice with -O3 and -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45869 --- Comment #2 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2010-10-02 18:55:10 UTC --- Running reghunt against the 4.5 branch indicates that the following update causes the failure: r161951 | rguenth | 2010-07-08 11:56:08 + (Thu, 08 Jul 2010) |

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 19:46:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:04 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org he environment.  How far should we go to emulate an IDE? So how

[Bug other/36150] colorize output of gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150 --- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 19:51:34 UTC --- For future reference, more examples of color diagnostics in clang can be found here: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2009-10/StateOfClang.pdf but that is quite

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 19:52:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Ok, I think the only way this half-sentence and the interpretation on the J3 mailing list make sense, is via the following

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-02 21:03:38 UTC --- The process isn't that lengthy, it's a binary search and shouldn't take more than half an hour maximum to identify the file that's being miscompiled.

[Bug testsuite/45856] gcc.c-torture/execute/cmpsf-1.c/cmpsi-2.c failed on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45856 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at

[Bug testsuite/45856] gcc.c-torture/execute/cmpsf-1.c/cmpsi-2.c failed on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45856 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 22:10:20 UTC --- On hppa, fails on flt (x=0, y=1). flt returns `T', but result is `F'.

[Bug c/45850] support color diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45850 --- Comment #10 from Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net 2010-10-02 22:35:12 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org And you say that you have colored output but you don't want FSF GCC to have it? Am I

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug c/45869] [4.5/4.6 Regression] type mismatch in shift expression produces ice with -O3 and -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45869 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug c/45869] [4.5/4.6 Regression] type mismatch in shift expression produces ice with -O3 and -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45869 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug debug/45865] [4.6 regression] Failed to build 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug libstdc++/45863] [4.6 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45863 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-03 00:31:09 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sun Oct 3 00:31:06 2010 New Revision: 164913 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164913 Log: Revert the pvs change.

[Bug libstdc++/45863] [4.6 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45863 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/45870] New: note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC 5 found (-O1 -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870 Summary: note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC 5 found (-O1 -g) Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/45870] note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC 5 found (-O1 -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870 --- Comment #2 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2010-10-03 04:04:48 UTC --- reghunt on the 4.5 branch indicates that the following update produces the notes described above (-O1 -g, checks enabled): r161414 | aoliva | 2010-06-25 21:11:56

[Bug debug/45870] note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC 5 found (-O1 -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870 --- Comment #3 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2010-10-03 04:10:32 UTC --- This bug can also be reproduced in the 4.6 snapshot, gcc-4.6-20100925 (svn revision 164623).