[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

2014-02-09 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #102 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On February 8, 2014 1:47:14 PM GMT+01:00, pault at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 Paul Thomas pault at

[Bug c++/59598] very simple code using file open for read

2014-02-09 Thread denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598 Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59598] very simple code using file open for read

2014-02-09 Thread denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598 --- Comment #46 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_alphabet it is correct because it works with every letter of russian alphabeth in that codepage except with small ya(which corresponds to

[Bug c++/59598] very simple code using file open for read

2014-02-09 Thread denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598 --- Comment #47 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net --- sorry wrote false. Here I corrected: it is correct because it works with every letter of russian alphabeth in that codepage except with small ya(which corresponds to U+044F

[Bug c++/59598] very simple code using file open for read

2014-02-09 Thread denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598 --- Comment #48 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net --- sorry wrote false. Here I corrected: it is correct because it works with every letter of russian alphabeth in that codepage except with small ya(which corresponds to U+044F

[Bug c++/59598] very simple code using file open for read

2014-02-09 Thread denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598 --- Comment #49 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net --- And do not try to lie for 4.6.1 version when I download it again. I do pay taxes regularly and even more, so do not put me into criminal world.

[Bug c++/59598] very simple code using file open for read

2014-02-09 Thread denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598 --- Comment #50 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net --- listen if you will not stop to fool me I wil act immediatelly by pointing each your step on a illustrated map!

[Bug c++/60124] New: g++ generates two copies of the same symbol due to __builtin_bswap32 return type

2014-02-09 Thread mat at lcs dot mit.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60124 Bug ID: 60124 Summary: g++ generates two copies of the same symbol due to __builtin_bswap32 return type Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/59395] [4.8 Regression] double free with procedure pointer component

2014-02-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59395 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The backtrace is: 0x8a95ff crash_signal /home/jweil/gcc48/branch/gcc/toplev.c:332 0x5bd997 free_components /home/jweil/gcc48/branch/gcc/fortran/symbol.c:2068 0x5bd997

[Bug fortran/59395] [4.8 Regression] double free with procedure pointer component

2014-02-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59395 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/60125] New: defaulted constructor with throwing NSDMI still declared as noexcept

2014-02-09 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60125 Bug ID: 60125 Summary: defaulted constructor with throwing NSDMI still declared as noexcept Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/60125] defaulted constructor with throwing NSDMI still declared as noexcept

2014-02-09 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60125 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/60125] [DR 1351] defaulted constructor with throwing NSDMI still declared as noexcept

2014-02-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60125 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED

[Bug c++/59526] [C++11] Defaulted special member functions don't accept noexcept if a member has a non-trivial noexcept operator in the corresponding special member function

2014-02-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59526 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59526] [C++11] Defaulted special member functions don't accept noexcept if a member has a non-trivial noexcept operator in the corresponding special member function

2014-02-09 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59526 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) Trunk doesn't give the same errors, but fails two of the assertions: n.cc:30:1: error: static assertion failed:

[Bug fortran/59395] [4.8 Regression] double free with procedure pointer component

2014-02-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59395 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Pretty much a duplicate of PR 58803 after all.

[Bug libstdc++/59603] std::random_shuffle tries to swap element with itself

2014-02-09 Thread joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603 --- Comment #4 from Jörg Richter joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de --- Are you sure that this is not a iter_swap problem? I have found nothing in the standard that iter_swap( x, x ) is undefined. I always thought types do not have to be prepared to handle

[Bug fortran/59395] [4.8 Regression] double free with procedure pointer component

2014-02-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59395 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Feb 9 17:32:07 2014 New Revision: 207644 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207644root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-02-09 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org Backport from

[Bug fortran/58803] Proc-pointer component: free_components deallocates twice pointer p-tb at symbol.c:2068

2014-02-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58803 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Feb 9 17:32:07 2014 New Revision: 207644 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207644root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-02-09 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org Backport from

[Bug fortran/59395] [4.8 Regression] double free with procedure pointer component

2014-02-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59395 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/59198] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on cyclically dependent polymorphic types

2014-02-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The ICE and backtrace one gets on all variants of the test case has changed slightly to: internal compiler error: in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.h:3653 class(rng_t), allocatable :: rng ^ 0xb24434

[Bug target/60116] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2014-02-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32086 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32086action=edit assembly dump from trunk revision 207643 I'm not able to trigger this problem with trunk

[Bug fortran/60122] Unexpected warning for uninitialised character variable

2014-02-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60122 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/59997] c_pointer = c_loc(...) internal compiler error

2014-02-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/55762] Diagnostic: Passing a procedure to LEN should tell that one has passed a procedure

2014-02-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55762 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/60126] New: Internal compiler error with code using pointer reshaping (gfortran 4.8.2)

2014-02-09 Thread mfvalin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126 Bug ID: 60126 Summary: Internal compiler error with code using pointer reshaping (gfortran 4.8.2) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/59026] ELEMENTAL procedure with VALUE arguments emits wrong code

2014-02-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59026 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 9 19:45:06 2014 New Revision: 207645 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207645root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-02-09 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org PR

[Bug fortran/60126] Internal compiler error with code using pointer reshaping (gfortran 4.8.2)

2014-02-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/60116] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2014-02-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/57522] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct creates array descriptor with incorrect stride for derived type array component

2014-02-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57522 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 9 20:50:21 2014 New Revision: 207646 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207646root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-02-09 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org PR

[Bug target/60116] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2014-02-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32088 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32088action=edit asm that prints 0 Strange, I can reproduce it easily with r207643 on Debian testing:

[Bug target/60116] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2014-02-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can reproduce 0 even with the assembly by Uros: $ ./xgcc -B./ -m32 -xassembler Uok.s; ./a.out 0

[Bug target/60116] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2014-02-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5) Created attachment 32088 [details] asm that prints 0 Well, $ gcc -m32 u.s ./a.out 1 as --version GNU assembler version 2.23.2 Copyright

[Bug target/60116] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2014-02-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Er, right, my attachment is useless, it is the same as Uros' (but I can't see how to remove it). If it matters: GNU assembler version 2.24 (x86_64-linux-gnu) using BFD version (GNU

[Bug fortran/60127] New: ICE with OpenMP and DO CONCURRENT

2014-02-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60127 Bug ID: 60127 Summary: ICE with OpenMP and DO CONCURRENT Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/60116] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2014-02-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Extract from a gdb session, showing 2 wrong branches taken: (gdb) p f $15 = 1 (gdb) step 15 j = k * 54; (gdb) 16 g = j * 147; (gdb) 18 if (d) (gdb) p d $16

[Bug fortran/60127] ICE with OpenMP and DO CONCURRENT

2014-02-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60127 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/57129] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Improve error message for conflicts between PROCEDURE and DERIVED.

2014-02-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) However, the error message is now different from before for the test case in comment 0 and this reduction: Confirmed. AFAICT the error

[Bug target/60116] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

2014-02-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32088|0 |1 is

[Bug fortran/60128] New: Wrong ouput using en edit descriptor

2014-02-09 Thread walt.brainerd at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128 Bug ID: 60128 Summary: Wrong ouput using en edit descriptor Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/40752] -Wconversion generates false warnings for operands not larger than target type

2014-02-09 Thread chengniansun at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752 --- Comment #25 from Chengnian Sun chengniansun at gmail dot com --- Today I encountered a similar case as follows. The conversion warning by gcc is not true as right-shifting an unsigned short decreases the value. BTW clang does not emit

[Bug c++/60113] Internal compiler error

2014-02-09 Thread dartmetrash at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60113 --- Comment #2 from lmat dartmetrash at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32090 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32090action=edit Bug report including command line output. My apologies! I was quite sure I had attached it, but

[Bug c++/60113] Internal compiler error

2014-02-09 Thread dartmetrash at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60113 --- Comment #3 from lmat dartmetrash at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32091 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32091action=edit part 2

[Bug target/60029] [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test

2014-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60029 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/60113] Internal compiler error

2014-02-09 Thread dartmetrash at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60113 --- Comment #4 from lmat dartmetrash at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32092 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32092action=edit part 3

[Bug target/60032] [4.9 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411

2014-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60032 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com --- *** Bug 60029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/60113] Internal compiler error

2014-02-09 Thread dartmetrash at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60113 --- Comment #5 from lmat dartmetrash at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32093 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32093action=edit part 4 I had to divide up part 2 a little more because it was 1084 KB (over the limit of 1000

[Bug c/60129] New: Imprecise column numbers in NOTEs on discarding const qualifiers from pointer target type

2014-02-09 Thread chengniansun at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60129 Bug ID: 60129 Summary: Imprecise column numbers in NOTEs on discarding const qualifiers from pointer target type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/58675] ICE in rs6000_secondary_reload_inner:15460, type = store

2014-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58675 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/52306] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

2014-02-09 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot

[Bug c++/60130] New: Sorry, unimplemented: mangling argument_pack_select

2014-02-09 Thread vince.rev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60130 Bug ID: 60130 Summary: Sorry, unimplemented: mangling argument_pack_select Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/57935] ICE in rs6000_secondary_reload_inner:15181, type = load

2014-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57935 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/58675] ICE in rs6000_secondary_reload_inner:15460, type = store

2014-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58675 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com --- *** Bug 57935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/58675] ICE in rs6000_secondary_reload_inner:15460, type = store

2014-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58675 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at

[Bug target/60074] g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-[34].cc FAIL on SPARC

2014-02-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60074 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/57936] ICE in rs6000_secondary_reload_inner:15144, type = load

2014-02-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57936 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/60113] Internal compiler error

2014-02-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60113 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/60128] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong ouput using en edit descriptor

2014-02-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW