https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |libgcc
--- Comment #29 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71651
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01766.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
Vlad Gheorghiu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vgheorgh at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43998
--- Comment #15 from Stas Sergeev ---
Btw, clang seems to allow same regs in input and clobber list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43998
Stas Sergeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stsp at users dot
sourceforge.net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to jack.s...@nasa.gov from comment #2)
> >
> > Could someone check that the problem is not darwin specific?
> >
Not darwin specific. Is the sample code valid?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656
Bug ID: 71656
Summary: ICE in reload when generating code for -mcpu=power9
-mpower9-dform-vector
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71654
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71655
Bug ID: 71655
Summary: GCC trunk ICE on westmere target
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71642
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71642
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 24 19:28:18 2016
New Revision: 237771
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237771=gcc=rev
Log:
PR debug/71642
* tree-inline.c (remap_decl): When fixing up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71654
Bug ID: 71654
Summary: missing VRP optimization on c++ unsigned char and
short expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71647
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 24 18:46:47 2016
New Revision: 237770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237770=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71647
* omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71647
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 24 18:44:11 2016
New Revision: 237769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237769=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71647
* omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses):
-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160624 (experimental) [trunk revision 237753] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71651
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Also affects gcc-6-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235
--- Comment #10 from Victor Porton ---
(In reply to Victor Porton from comment #8)
> Note fixed in GCC 6.1.1.
Sorry, should read "Not fixed in GCC 6.1.1."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71653
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Gozzo ---
This error happens in the 6.1 version too (tested here http://gcc.godbolt.org)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71653
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Gozzo ---
Created attachment 38765
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38765=edit
source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235
--- Comment #9 from Victor Porton ---
A similar bug (but with another error message) appears in GNAT GPL 2016 for
Windows x32 32bit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71653
Bug ID: 71653
Summary: error when trying to compile a code with template
friend function in a struct
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71651
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71648
--- Comment #4 from Konstantinos Margaritis ---
That's true, it compiled fine with -mcpu=power8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71648
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71585
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71585
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Hello
The problem can be seen on both GCC 6.x and current trunk, where we show
following warning message:
pr71585.c:2:9: warning: bad option ‘-fno-stack-protector’ to pragma ‘optimize’
[-Wpragmas]
#pragma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71652
Bug ID: 71652
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in in ix86_target_macros_internal,
at config/i386/i386-c.c:187
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71647
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71651
Bug ID: 71651
Summary: Option suggestion provides a non-existing hint
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71650
Bug ID: 71650
Summary: unnecessary call to __memcpy_chk emitted on a bounded
copy
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70473
--- Comment #6 from Leonid Lisovskiy ---
Created attachment 38762
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38762=edit
genautomata output ARM
I have the same problem for both ARM(armv7-a) & MIPS platforms. By valgrind
report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70473
Leonid Lisovskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lly.dev at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649
--- Comment #2 from jack.saba at nasa dot gov ---
I tried it on a ubuntu machine and got the same error.
Jack Saba
jack.s...@nasa.gov
Science, Systems, and Applications, Inc.
Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory, Code 615
Bldg 33 Room A328
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71648
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71649
Bug ID: 71649
Summary: Internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70032
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71648
--- Comment #1 from Konstantinos Margaritis ---
Created attachment 38760
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38760=edit
Reduced testcase for ICE on ppc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71648
Bug ID: 71648
Summary: C++ ICE on ppc64 with -m64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71647
Bug ID: 71647
Summary: aligned(x:32) in #pragma omp simd does not work
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71642
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71645
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71646
Bug ID: 71646
Summary: incompability between ptx code and GPU hardware
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71645
Bug ID: 71645
Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/nestedfn5.f90
-O3 -g (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71644
Bug ID: 71644
Summary: gcc 6.1 generates movaps for unaligned memory
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71643
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #23 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rdapp from comment #19)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
> 2.
> Is there an idiomatic/correct way to check a VR_RANGE for overflow? Does it
> suffice to check if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71643
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71643
Bug ID: 71643
Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2318 after r237427
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623
--- Comment #3 from zed.three at gmail dot com ---
Changing the pointer to an allocatable array results in the same behaviour:
$ cat allocate_size_mvce.f90
program allocatemvce
implicit none
character(len=:), allocatable :: string
integer,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71638
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71642
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71642
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
--- Comment #9 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to nsz from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> > > Or we could do like clang and improve alias analysis. We should know that
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
--- Comment #8 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> > Or we could do like clang and improve alias analysis. We should know that
> > array doesn't escape and thus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71630
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
One could also argue that this is an accept invalid issue:
markus@x4 tmp % cat llvm.ii
template struct integral_constant {
static constexpr _Tp value = 0;
};
template using __bool_constant =
languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160624 (experimental) [trunk revision 237753] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #22 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rdapp from comment #21)
> (In reply to amker from comment #20)
> > IIUC we can simply handle signed/unsigned type differently. Given a has
> > int/uint type.
> > For unsigned case:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71641
Bug ID: 71641
Summary: 22_locale/time_get/get_date/wchar_t/4.cc runs failure
if static linking
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640
Bug ID: 71640
Summary: [7 Regression]
include/c++/7.0.0/bits/hashtable.h:293:7: error: too
many template parameters in template redeclaration
Product: gcc
66 matches
Mail list logo
