https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #8 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Ping. Is there any interest in fixing this regression?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81768
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Version|unk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42568
--- Comment #33 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #32)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #30)
> > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #29)
> > > I happened to just get Cygwin installed and running on my Wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81834
Bug ID: 81834
Summary: Simple loop with single variable is not optimized out
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81736
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Add -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer should make these tests pass on Solaris.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81736
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
i386/sol2.h has
#define SUBTARGET_OPTIMIZATION_OPTIONS \
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_momit_leaf_frame_pointer, NULL, 1 }
i386.c:
/* Keep nonleaf frame pointers. */
if (opts->x_flag_om
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81832
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81793
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Rainer: what I reported _is_ a target issue, and fixed by Alan's r251065.
powerpc-linux supports static and pie just fine. Your patch is also good,
but a separate issue!
nu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr81736-3.c"
1
#
/NO_APP
popl%ebx
ret
.size foo, .-foo
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 8.0.0 20170812 (experimental)"
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc]$
These 2 testcases may have exposed an existing issue for Solaris/i386 target.
Please verify it with GCC 7 and open a new bug if this is a real issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42568
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #30)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #29)
> > I happened to just get Cygwin installed and running on my Windows box. Let
> > me run some tests and see if I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81793
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81793
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Sat Aug 12 16:00:00 2017
New Revision: 251067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Require -static support in gcc.dg/pie-static-[12].c (PR testsuite/81793)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81793
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-linux |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81736
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
Bug ID: 81833
Summary: [7 Regression] PowerPC: VSX: Miscompiles ffmpeg's
scalarproduct_int16_vsx at -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81738
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81809
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60355
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 60355, which changed state.
Bug 60355 Summary: [F08] constraint C519 for BIND attribute not enforced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60355
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542
--- Comment #9 from John Marino ---
That's great, although it seems to only have been applied to TRUNK (gcc 8). I
know it is too late for gcc 7.2, but this changeset should still be backported
to the GCC 7.x branch as well.
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: antoine.balestrat at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello !
I'm using a freshly built version of GCC (gcc version 8.0.0 20170812) :
$ cat tested.c
int a, b, *c;
void d(void)
{
int **e;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81785
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542
--- Comment #8 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Sat Aug 12 09:07:12 2017
New Revision: 251066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR79542][Ada] Fix ICE in dwarf2out.c with nested func.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804
--- Comment #12 from Claudiu Zissulescu ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #11)
> I'm confused. Who is actually the effective maintainer of ARC? All the
> patches on gcc-patches seem to go like
Hi,
I am the effective ARC maintainer, jus
27 matches
Mail list logo
