https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95558
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.7.1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102440
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |other
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to AJ D from comment #15)
> Is it fixed in GCC-9.4?
>
> Didn't find PR99334 in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.
> cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED=FIXED_milestone=9.4
>
> If not, which GCC9.*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0, 11.1.0, 8.5.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102326
Pengcheng Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334
--- Comment #15 from AJ D ---
Is it fixed in GCC-9.4?
Didn't find PR99334 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED=FIXED_milestone=9.4
If not, which GCC9.* release can we expect a fix for it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102440
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102440
Bug ID: 102440
Summary: Uinteger Opt/Param but the underlying type is signed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102438
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> currently the i386 backend doesn't support V1DFmode, and it's treated as a
> DImode (an equal-size integer type) and passed by stack.
typo, moved through stack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102438
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
currently the i386 backend doesn't support V1DFmode, and it's treated as a
DImode (an equal-size integer type) and passed by stack.
Shall we support V1DFmode?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102404
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Freddie Witherden from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 51485 [details]
> > Clang assembly.
>
> It seems to be because the current GCC loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102404
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Freddie Witherden from comment #4)
> Created attachment 51485 [details]
> Clang assembly.
It seems to be because the current GCC loop vectorizer does not support
different vector sizes, and here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107
--- Comment #22 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Backported to 11 and 10. Not doing GCC 9; the problem is older than that,
and the backport wouldn't be completely trivial. Paul, please close if
everything is okay now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102347
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Quickly looking at the rs6000 code, it fails here:
>
> #1 0x11a0993c in rs6000_invalid_builtin
> (fncode=MMA_BUILTIN_DISASSEMBLE_ACC_INTERNAL) at
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102439
Bug ID: 102439
Summary: deprecated attributes do not work on struct/class if
type is auto deduced
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14b7e8ace8236bd341a182dc3ef044fe98de5525
commit r10-10144-g14b7e8ace8236bd341a182dc3ef044fe98de5525
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a989ccd3cbc31cb0e5fecd9423fc1577f3694b0
commit r10-10143-g5a989ccd3cbc31cb0e5fecd9423fc1577f3694b0
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da0a5628d47ee59320dac9787f3232b0911fbc14
commit r11-9022-gda0a5628d47ee59320dac9787f3232b0911fbc14
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5210f05c6eba12561914cb0fdf7aec149b28f179
commit r11-9021-g5210f05c6eba12561914cb0fdf7aec149b28f179
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102438
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
There might be a dup of this bug too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102438
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102438
Bug ID: 102438
Summary: [x86-64] Failure to optimize out random extra
store+load in vector code when memcpy is used
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102049
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102371
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 08:05:02PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102371
>
> anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102437
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> common.opt lists -R since r0-104214-g6d721f6786362871895a36e4f26f09ded82d55ec
> so for quite a while as a driver option.
I think r11-635-g6232d02b4fce4c67d398
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102437
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Summary|[11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102437
Bug ID: 102437
Summary: [11 Regression] gcc-11 and later started recognising
-R option
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> It seems like only this feature which libtool gets wrong.
>
> There are other places where lt_cv_prog_gnu_ld/with_gnu_ld is checked.
> So it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102436
Bug ID: 102436
Summary: [11/12 Regression] Lost Load/Store Motion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||longb at cray dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102371
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54192
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021, rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> Yes, as said in other contexts GCC happily _removes_ traps if trapping
> is the only side-effect. _Unless_ you also have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102419
--- Comment #4 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
> IMHO Clang/MSVC are clearly misbehaving here -- when evaluating the
> concept-id X, they appear to be substituting {int} into X's
> constraint-expression instead of into the normal form of X's
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102435
Bug ID: 102435
Summary: gcc 9: aarch64 -ftree-loop-vectorize results in wrong
code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102432
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I just saw a related bug which is much older and dates from around 4.4 time
frame.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102434
Bug ID: 102434
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in
output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102433
Bug ID: 102433
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in ~saved_token_sentinel, at
cp/parser.c:1293
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fabf86a52c46db19026a956cf386da46fa4d0be
commit r9-9738-g0fabf86a52c46db19026a956cf386da46fa4d0be
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102432
Bug ID: 102432
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in _cpp_lex_direct, at
libcpp/lex.c:2949
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102431
Bug ID: 102431
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in lower_gimple_bind, at
gimple-low.c:439
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102430
Bug ID: 102430
Summary: ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2554
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1591a283767168982ff60414ee01aaa1400fbf8
commit r10-10142-ga1591a283767168982ff60414ee01aaa1400fbf8
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101330
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
A better test case :
$ cat z2.f90
!$omp task affinity (iterator(j=1:2:))
!$omp task affinity (iterator(j=1:2::))
!$omp task affinity (iterator(j=1:-2:))
!$omp task depend (iterator(j=1:2:))
!$omp task
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102287
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102287
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4210c6c62f6938cd70d768b1bd1ea98d13e3b805
commit r9-9737-g4210c6c62f6938cd70d768b1bd1ea98d13e3b805
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94673
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102287
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:216a4be1cc18119a83df562f7abb3dcebd9ce512
commit r10-10141-g216a4be1cc18119a83df562f7abb3dcebd9ce512
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3db5b1d23cbe4e4569e688a6dbc8b5b2c38588e
commit r10-10140-gd3db5b1d23cbe4e4569e688a6dbc8b5b2c38588e
Author: Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fbab3afca910c055676ebc566bf87c4d5a7372f
commit r11-9020-g7fbab3afca910c055676ebc566bf87c4d5a7372f
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102415
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51491
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51491=edit
gcc12-pr102415.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102429
Bug ID: 102429
Summary: nvptx: ICE with expand_GOMP_SIMT_XCHG_BFLY : in
expand_insn, at optabs.c:7947
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102428
Bug ID: 102428
Summary: d: Set TREE_NOTHROW for nothrow functions and library
calls
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81157
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94673
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-21
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102427
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
--- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt ---
Jakub, could you add a note with a section ID in
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html as was done for the similar case in GCC
10? This allowed us to specify a URL in the informational diagnostic, like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102427
--- Comment #2 from David Brown ---
Runtime detection is good - compile-time detection is much, much better when it
is possible. (IMHO, of course.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102427
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can use -fsanitize=undefined to detect overflow at runtime.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102427
Bug ID: 102427
Summary: -Woverflow only works in constant expressions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So libtool has been broken for over 15 years for this option and we are only
noticing now. G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102419
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
And similarly for:
template concept Y = true;
template concept X = Y;
static_assert(!X);
GCC rejects and Clang/MSVC accept. IMHO Clang/MSVC are clearly misbehaving
here -- when evaluating the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101597
Philip Herron changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philip.herron at embecosm dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102419
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
Note that you can make GCC effectively behave like Clang/MSVC here changing Y's
constraint-expression to trivially depend on its template parameter:
template concept Y = requires { typename U; };
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102419
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102425
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
Bug ID: 102426
Summary: [12 regression] Fix for PR 49664 breaks Solaris
bootstrap with gld
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102425
Bug ID: 102425
Summary: std::error_code() does not compare equal to
std::error_condition()
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102424
Bug ID: 102424
Summary: OpenACC 'reduction' with outer 'loop seq', inner 'loop
gang'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102256
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102423
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102408
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102408
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e87789f197e47259c94349821d3446f7d959e08f
commit r12-3726-ge87789f197e47259c94349821d3446f7d959e08f
Author: Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93007
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102421
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102421
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55b989de7679a486ad674fb154408de26ac96467
commit r12-3724-g55b989de7679a486ad674fb154408de26ac96467
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
The warning for the one in comment #0 is gone on the trunk
The warning for the testcase in comment #6 is gone in GCC 11.1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102421
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> > Going to use the following for g++.dg/vect/
> >
> > /* { dg-do compile } */
> > /* { dg-additional-options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102421
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> Going to use the following for g++.dg/vect/
>
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-additional-options "-O3" } */
> /* { dg-additional-options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marco.morandini at polimi dot
it
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
reduced testcase:
static int b[3] = { 1, 2, 3 };
int fstatic_array (void)
{
return b[7]; // missing -Warray-bounds
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102421
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Going to use the following for g++.dg/vect/
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-additional-options "-O3" } */
/* { dg-additional-options "-march=armv8.2-a+sve" { target aarch64-*-* } } */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102421
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Unincluded testcase:
#include
template
struct BasicVector
{
ValueType& operator[](int i) { return x_[i]; }
ValueType operator[](int i) const { return x_[i]; }
ValueType x_[3];
};
typedef int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102421
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
On x86 get_group_load_store_type ends up with VMAT_ELEMENTWISE because
/* As a last resort, trying using a gather load or scatter store.
??? Although the code can handle all group sizes
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
