[Bug fortran/95196] Assumed-rank incorrect array bounds inside select rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95196 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/95196] Assumed-rank incorrect array bounds inside select rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95196 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:693abdb66aba25f3fb25c3cd8d65dbb64ecd37a0 commit r12-4638-g693abdb66aba25f3fb25c3cd8d65dbb64ecd37a0 Author: Sandra Loosemore

[Bug target/102907] aarch64/shrn-combine-[123].c fail with SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102907 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-10-22

[Bug target/102907] New: aarch64/shrn-combine-[123].c fail with SVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102907 Bug ID: 102907 Summary: aarch64/shrn-combine-[123].c fail with SVE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/102857] [12 regression] r12-4526 caused regressions on ssa-dom-thread-7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102857 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- Sure, I just filed PR 102906 for the ivopts-4.c issue on arm.

[Bug middle-end/102906] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/arm/ivopts-4.c fails since r12-4526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906 Bug ID: 102906 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/arm/ivopts-4.c fails since r12-4526 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/102832] [12 Regression] ICE in vect_create_partial_epilog with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/102663] add an install-dvi Makefile target to the toplevel Makefile and all subdirectories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102663 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/102663] add an install-dvi Makefile target to the toplevel Makefile and all subdirectories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102663 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Gallager : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3e80a16af287e804b87b8015307085399755cd4 commit r12-4636-gc3e80a16af287e804b87b8015307085399755cd4 Author: Eric Gallager Date:

[Bug middle-end/48580] missed optimization: integer overflow checks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/102894] make_any is not SFINAE-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102894 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug libstdc++/102894] make_any is not SFINAE-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102894 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c1f737a485f05c591c94b50acfb416c45a4c916 commit r12-4634-g0c1f737a485f05c591c94b50acfb416c45a4c916 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24e99e6ec1cc57f3660c00ff677c7feb16aa94d2 commit r12-4632-g24e99e6ec1cc57f3660c00ff677c7feb16aa94d2 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/102829] Redundant null check after atomic load from that address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102829 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/102826] Glibc "--disable-mathvec" configure option fail to disable traces to libmvec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102826 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #3) > However, in the gfortran config part of gcc, it should not has the finclude > part for F951 under all circumstances or there should be some option to > control

[Bug middle-end/102810] [11/12 Regression] Bogus Wstringop-overread passing a smaller array to an array parameter without a bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102810 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://stackoverflow.com/q | |/69583120/5264491

[Bug libstdc++/102894] make_any is not SFINAE-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102894 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/102882] [AIX] 23_containers 96088 testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102882 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- OK, that confirms that the allocations are being done by the std::string objects inside the library. But I really don't want to have to use custom allocators every time we use std::string in such tests.

[Bug c++/102899] Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > The object is only destroyed after the destructor finishes, which is never > in this case. But it's still wrong to re-enter the destructor after it starts,

[Bug tree-optimization/102794] [12 Regression] missing vrp in evrp dealing with casts and ands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102794 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/102899] Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > What I see is clang performing checks at a place it shouldn't. > It can be better seen on > struct Test { > constexpr Test() = default; > > constexpr

[Bug fortran/102817] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_clear_shape, at fortran/expr.c:422 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Furthermore the "scalar" variants work: ... type(t), parameter :: u= t(4) ... y = (u%a) ...

[Bug c++/102876] GCC fails to use constant initialization even when it knows the value to initialize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102876 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug testsuite/102857] [12 regression] r12-4526 caused regressions on ssa-dom-thread-7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102857 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |testsuite CC|

[Bug fortran/102817] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_clear_shape, at fortran/expr.c:422 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Strange. We happen to call gfc_free_shape with inconsistent data: (gdb) p rank $84 = 2 (gdb) p shape[1] $85 = (mpz_t *) 0x0 Not good. Interestingly the following works: integer :: z(1,2) =

[Bug middle-end/102857] [12 regression] r12-4526 caused regressions on ssa-dom-thread-7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102857 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 regression] r12-4526|[12 regression] r12-4526

[Bug fortran/98342] Allocatable component in call to assumed-rank routine causes invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98342 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Has this bug been fully fixed now, so that we can close it? It seems so.

[Bug testsuite/102905] [12 regression] several vector test cases fail on power 7 after r12-4490

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102905 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/102902] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (generated code hangs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102902 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/102892] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target

[Bug fortran/102891] Passing real part of complex type component using w%z%re to a subroutine gives erroneous value of dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/98342] Allocatable component in call to assumed-rank routine causes invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98342 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/92482] BIND(C) with array-descriptor mishandled for type character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||everythingfunctional@proton

[Bug fortran/99922] Bind(C) with assumed length character should work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99922 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11 Regression] wrong code with "-O1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/102508] ICE on coroutine when awaiting inside a statement expression (in transform_local_var_uses, at cp/coroutines.cc:2102)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102508 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- thanks for the simplified test case. As noted in pr98935, statement expressions are not handled (I deferred handling them in the initial implementation since they are an extension)... however, it is intended

[Bug bootstrap/102675] [12 regression] Bootstrap fails in libsanitizer: 'MD5_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > > Another possibility is to revert your patch so that others can bootstrap. The problem won't go away as long as we keep syncing with upstream.

[Bug fortran/102816] [12 Regression] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1467 since r12-4452-g1e819bd95ebeefc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102816 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug testsuite/102742] ERROR: descriptor 3 still open after tests complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102742 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/102742] ERROR: descriptor 3 still open after tests complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102742 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:690180eb4b35df3f4b5def690878ecaeb5492e41 commit r12-4630-g690180eb4b35df3f4b5def690878ecaeb5492e41 Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug bootstrap/102675] [12 regression] Bootstrap fails in libsanitizer: 'MD5_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/102905] New: [12 regression] several vector test cases fail on power 7 after r12-4490

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102905 Bug ID: 102905 Summary: [12 regression] several vector test cases fail on power 7 after r12-4490 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/102897] [12 Regression] simplify_permutation ICEs on assert since r12-1103-g4a9f2306cb39a3cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102897 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target

[Bug tree-optimization/102902] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (generated code hangs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102902 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||100810 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/102898] declaration of 'using Foo = enum class Foo' changes meaning of 'Foo'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102898 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libffi/101208] libffi.call/nested_struct12.c fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101208 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/102904] New: go testsuite does not always cause a timeout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102904 Bug ID: 102904 Summary: go testsuite does not always cause a timeout Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/102899] Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 --- Comment #6 from friedkeenan at protonmail dot com --- Well it says "being destroyed" not "already destroyed", because the object is currently being destroyed

[Bug fortran/94289] Assumed-rank array bounds resuscitate on the second call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94289 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/102899] Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- What I see is clang performing checks at a place it shouldn't. It can be better seen on struct Test { constexpr Test() = default; constexpr ~Test() { delete this; } }; consteval bool

[Bug fortran/94289] Assumed-rank array bounds resuscitate on the second call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94289 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c31d2d14f798dc7ca9cc078200d37113749ec3bd commit r12-4629-gc31d2d14f798dc7ca9cc078200d37113749ec3bd Author: Sandra Loosemore

[Bug fortran/102903] New: Invalid gfortran.dg testcases or wrong-code with -fcheck=all -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102903 Bug ID: 102903 Summary: Invalid gfortran.dg testcases or wrong-code with -fcheck=all -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/102886] [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-18.c fails starting with r12-4607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102886 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor --- I posted a fix on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582380.html

[Bug fortran/102843] [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/102899] Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 --- Comment #4 from friedkeenan at protonmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Just compile your testcase with additional > -Dconstexpr= -Dconsteval= -D'static_assert(x)=' > to see how it is compiled, there is that

[Bug fortran/102900] ICE via gfc_class_data_get with alloc_comp_class_4.f03 or proc_ptr_52.f90 using -fcheck=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE via gfc_class_data_get |ICE via gfc_class_data_get

[Bug c++/102899] Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Just compile your testcase with additional -Dconstexpr= -Dconsteval= -D'static_assert(x)=' to see how it is compiled, there is that infinite recursion with all compilers I've tried.

[Bug c++/102899] Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 --- Comment #2 from friedkeenan at protonmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Why do you think this is a compiler bug? > If you delete this, you invoke the destructor and then the operator delete, > so when you do this

[Bug c++/102899] Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/102902] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (generated code hangs)

--with-system-zlib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.0.0 20211022 (experimental) [master r12-4624-gae5c540662e] (GCC) [576] % [576] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out [577] % [577] % gcctk -O3 small.c [578] % timeout -s 9 10 ./a.out Killed [579] % [579] % cat small.c

[Bug fortran/102901] New: ICE (segfault) when compiling pdt_13.f03 with -fcheck=all in gfc_check_pdt_dummy -> structure_alloc_comps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102901 Bug ID: 102901 Summary: ICE (segfault) when compiling pdt_13.f03 with -fcheck=all in gfc_check_pdt_dummy -> structure_alloc_comps Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug fortran/100917] Bind(c): errors handling long double real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/102900] New: ICE via gfc_class_data_get in alloc_comp_class_4.f03 with -fcheck=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102900 Bug ID: 102900 Summary: ICE via gfc_class_data_get in alloc_comp_class_4.f03 with -fcheck=all Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/102503] ICE in gfc_conv_array_bound, at fortran/trans-types.c:1224

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102503 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/102899] New: Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102899 Bug ID: 102899 Summary: Performing `delete this` within destructor in constant evaluation results in infinitely recursive error message Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7cb6d66bd52e884ff33c61e46a9ee9facc2ac60 commit r12-4628-gb7cb6d66bd52e884ff33c61e46a9ee9facc2ac60 Author: Sandra Loosemore

[Bug fortran/102843] [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/102898] New: declaration of 'using Foo = enum class Foo' changes meaning of 'Foo'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102898 Bug ID: 102898 Summary: declaration of 'using Foo = enum class Foo' changes meaning of 'Foo' Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 81981, which changed state. Bug 81981 Summary: [8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined makes a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning disappear https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81981 What|Removed

[Bug sanitizer/81981] [8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined makes a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning disappear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81981 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/102862] CLASS(*) – various issues, esp. with assumed-rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102862 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug testsuite/102886] [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-18.c fails starting with r12-4607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102886 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- In both case I get FAIL! chrcmp: 66 != 65281 FAIL! chrcmp: 66 != 65281 FAIL! chrcmp: 67 != 65282 FAIL! chrcmp: 68 != 65283 FAIL! chrcmp: 69 != 65284 FAIL! chrcmp: 70 != 65285 FAIL! chrcmp: 71 !=

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/102503] ICE in gfc_conv_array_bound, at fortran/trans-types.c:1224

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102503 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/102893] [9/10/11 Regression] CDDCE does not detect empty infinite nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102893 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks for the fix! This was reported to us by a user of the arm embedded toolchains that was upgrading from gcc 7. We won't be releasing any new releases for GCC 8 and 9, but may be for 10 and 11 is

[Bug libffi/102896] src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102896 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED URL|

[Bug libffi/102896] src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102896 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > Then, please file it here: https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues. Done. https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues/666

[Bug fortran/96870] Class name on error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96870 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug libffi/102896] src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102896 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Then, please file it here: https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues.

[Bug libffi/102896] src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102896 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > Does it happen in libffi upstream? > > https://github.com/libffi/libffi Yes.

[Bug tree-optimization/102890] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.c:6173 since r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102890 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libffi/102896] src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102896 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/102890] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate_and_interleave, at tree-vect-slp.c:6173 since r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102890 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug tree-optimization/102893] [9/10/11 Regression] CDDCE does not detect empty infinite nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102893 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/102893] [9/10/11/12 Regression] CDDCE does not detect empty infinite nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102893 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2a9a98a369528c8689ecb68db576f8e7dc2fa45 commit r12-4627-gc2a9a98a369528c8689ecb68db576f8e7dc2fa45 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus

[Bug tree-optimization/102897] [12 Regression] simplify_permutation ICEs on assert since r12-1103-g4a9f2306cb39a3cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102897 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libffi/102896] src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102896 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug tree-optimization/102897] New: [12 Regression] simplify_permutation ICEs on assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102897 Bug ID: 102897 Summary: [12 Regression] simplify_permutation ICEs on assert Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/102681] [12 Regression] AArch64 bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libffi/102896] src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102896 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/102895] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102895 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > There's identical IL before the vrp2 pass (the one after strlen) but on the > GCC 11 branch vrp2 eliminates the call to foo while on trunk it does not. > >

[Bug libffi/102896] New: src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102896 Bug ID: 102896 Summary: src/moxie/ffi.c:239:arrayIndexOutOfBounds Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/102893] [9/10/11/12 Regression] CDDCE does not detect empty infinite nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102893 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/102895] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102895 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Keywords|

  1   2   >