https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2dc5d6b1e7ec8822f5bd78761962ca2c85d4a2b4
commit r13-4607-g2dc5d6b1e7ec8822f5bd78761962ca2c85d4a2b4
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108008
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Monakov ---
Looks similar to PR 107323, but needs explicit -ftree-loop-distribution to
trigger.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
>
> --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108067
--- Comment #1 from danakj at orodu dot net ---
Notably, this occurs with friend operator== or operator<=>.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108067
Bug ID: 108067
Summary: Miscompilation with friend function with parameter
pack: mismatched argument pack lengths
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108066
danakj at orodu dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|12.2.0 |13.0
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108066
Bug ID: 108066
Summary: ICE in use_pack_expansion_extra_args_p, at
cp/pt.cc:12661
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc 13.0.0 20221211 snapshot (g:8f72249ff4cbd0a5c701b99ee8aa1ca9d82df046) ICEs
when compiling gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059
--- Comment #2 from LIU Hao ---
Reconfirmed with all the following versions:
* g++-10 (Ubuntu 10.4.0-4ubuntu1~22.04) 10.4.0
* g++-11 (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0
* g++-12 (Ubuntu 12.2.0-3ubuntu1~22.04) 12.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102180
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've swapped out just about all the details on this work after more than a
year, but we shouldn't be trying to create a CFI descriptor with
BT_ASSUMED at all, should we? If the compiler is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Eric Schmidt from comment #5)
> Surely this should have been resolved as INVALID?
It was marked as won't fix as I am saying we won't fix (change) the compiler to
reject it (even though the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #6 from jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> You can read up more on the one definition rule here:
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/definition
>
> It is a good summary of what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
Eric Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric41293 at comcast dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> Should be fixed in GCC 13.
If I compile the original testcase with -O3, I get for test2:
_1 = this_6(D) + 16;
_2 = _6(D)->data1;
if (_1 != _2)
so we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108064
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
r
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with:
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.0 20221211 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f72249ff4cbd0a5c701b99ee8aa1ca9d82df046
commit r13-4605-g8f72249ff4cbd0a5c701b99ee8aa1ca9d82df046
Author: Steve Kargl
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gilles Gouaillardet from comment #2)
> ubuntu does not ship libgfortran.so from gfortran-11.
>
> I tried on a RedHat box, and the issue only occurs when
> - I compile with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108062
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I tried to test this but my cmake is not new enough:
Target "example" requires the language dialect "CXX20" , but CMake does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can read up more on the one definition rule here:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/definition
It is a good summary of what the standard says.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d18a4b98d9b6bff4ba8b215f1e66e51ffba9638
commit r10-6-g9d18a4b98d9b6bff4ba8b215f1e66e51ffba9638
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40b5a2354b58955aef168104c173311f062f1fa5
commit r11-10415-g40b5a2354b58955aef168104c173311f062f1fa5
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f12c8f93111e2fb0bd73d1bad52325001990
commit r12-8969-gf12c8f93111e2fb0bd73d1bad52325001990
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108050
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9d8c9674ad3ad3aa38419d24b1aaaffe31f5d3f
commit r13-4604-gd9d8c9674ad3ad3aa38419d24b1aaaffe31f5d3f
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904
--- Comment #8 from Zebediah Figura ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #2 from jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch ---
The forgotten command line:
g++ -o main main.cpp dummy.cpp undefined_behavior.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.3.1, 12.2.0, 4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
Bug ID: 108063
Summary: push_back on std::vector allocates wrong amount of
memory
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
///
I use gcc 13.0.0 20221211, spdlog 1.11.0 20221211
In file included from
c:\gcc1300\x86_64-w64-mingw32\include\spdlog\fmt\fmt.h:14,
from c:\gcc1300\x86_64-w64-mingw32\include\spdlog\common.h:50,
from c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108058
pionere at freemail dot hu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c++
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108061
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
Created attachment 54066
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54066=edit
gkd diff #2
The following change yields the attached fiff instead:
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ quux (int x)
int
bar (int x,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108061
Bug ID: 108061
Summary: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -m32 -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compare-debug-failure
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060
Bug ID: 108060
Summary: UBsan missed an out-of-bound bug at -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108051
Leandro Nini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drfiemost at email dot it
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d13b86f932ff7b9d8f41483fd869c637b67d4dec
commit r13-4600-gd13b86f932ff7b9d8f41483fd869c637b67d4dec
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8d136e50e6f82cba793483d910a2b2643108508
commit r13-4598-gf8d136e50e6f82cba793483d910a2b2643108508
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.1.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108059
Bug ID: 108059
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at
cp/pt.c:16425
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Summary|backward
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108041
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108041
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108023
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
LIM store-motion combines possibly multiple store locations into a single one,
and I agree it's possibly confusing to assign the location to the real store in
this way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108058
Bug ID: 108058
Summary: Missed optimization with O3 and m32 when unwinding a
loop
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #13 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #12)
> (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #11)
> > It has nothing to do with MSYS2. MSYS2 is merely an example to show that .la
> > files are not necessary and should not be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #12 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #11)
> It has nothing to do with MSYS2. MSYS2 is merely an example to show that .la
> files are not necessary and should not be installed.
but your build scripts do that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #11 from LIU Hao ---
It has nothing to do with MSYS2. MSYS2 is merely an example to show that .la
files are not necessary and should not be installed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
Rimvydas (RJ) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #10 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #9)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #8)
> > if I delete them by hand, then gcc could not build anymore since build
> > scripts of libstdc++ would complain .la do not exist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027
--- Comment #9 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #8)
> if I delete them by hand, then gcc could not build anymore since build
> scripts of libstdc++ would complain .la do not exist
No library in MSYS2 has been installed with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108057
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Forcing libgo.so.21 from the GCC 12 build makes the build of golang 1.9 succeed
here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108057
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108057
Bug ID: 108057
Summary: libgo21 not ABI compatible gcc12 vs gcc13?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108021
laurent.alfonsi at linaro dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
That worked fine, so trying 09c91caeb84e7c36.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108056
Rimvydas (RJ) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
I am having a go at a git bisect. Trying 892e8c520be37d0a.
71 matches
Mail list logo
