[Bug target/113871] psrlq is not used for PERM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113871 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note `PERM<{0},a,{1,2,3,4}>` should be handled too, that means defining `vec_shl_` patterns too.

[Bug target/113872] New: PERM<{0},a,{3,4,5,6}> is not producing SHL (for little-endian) and USHR for big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113872 Bug ID: 113872 Summary: PERM<{0},a,{3,4,5,6}> is not producing SHL (for little-endian) and USHR for big-endian Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/113871] psrlq is not used for PERM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113871 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv

[Bug target/113871] New: psrlq is not used for PERM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113871 Bug ID: 113871 Summary: psrlq is not used for PERM Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/113870] Add V2HF support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113870 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||113869 --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug target/113870] New: Add V2HF support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113870 Bug ID: 113870 Summary: Add V2HF support Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/113869] New: V4HF->V4SF pattern seems to be missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113869 Bug ID: 113869 Summary: V4HF->V4SF pattern seems to be missing Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/113863] [14 Regression] ICE verify_ssa failed with -O3 -msse4.1 since r14-8768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113863 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/113863] [14 Regression] ICE verify_ssa failed with -O3 -msse4.1 since r14-8768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113863 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug ada/113868] New: error: expression function must be enclosed in parentheses.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113868 Bug ID: 113868 Summary: error: expression function must be enclosed in parentheses. Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/105980] [11 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2811

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105980 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/111342] ICE for g++.target/i386/pr105980.C on x86_64-apple-darwin21

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111342 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- The runtime issue is now PR113867.

[Bug middle-end/113867] [14 Regression][OpenMP] Wrong code with mapping pointers in structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 57382 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57382=edit Fortran testcase, kind of, as pointer + pointee mapping cannot be split (working) For completeness, a Fortran

[Bug middle-end/113867] New: [14 Regression][OpenMP] Wrong code with mapping pointers in structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867 Bug ID: 113867 Summary: [14 Regression][OpenMP] Wrong code with mapping pointers in structs Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp,

[Bug fortran/113866] ice in generic_simplify_COND_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113866 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-10 Ever

[Bug fortran/113866] New: ice in generic_simplify_COND_EXPR

rom the flang testsuite at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/main/flang/test when compiled by recent gfortran, does this: est $ ~/gcc/results.20240210.asan.ubsan/bin/gfortran -c -w ./Lower/HLFIR/bindc-assumed-length.f90 ./Lower/HLFIR/bindc-assumed-length.f90:39:29: 39 | c

[Bug fortran/113846] ice in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2757

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113846 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- >From the same flang test suite, the following files seem to crash in the same routine: ./Lower/HLFIR/structure-constructor.f90 ./Lower/HLFIR/convert-mbox-to-value.f90 ./Lower/polymorphic-temp.f90

[Bug rust/113865] New: FAIL: rust/execute/torture/issue-2187.rs -O0 output pattern test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113865 Bug ID: 113865 Summary: FAIL: rust/execute/torture/issue-2187.rs -O0 output pattern test Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rust/113864] New: FAIL: rust/debug/chartype.rs scan-assembler 0x10[ \t][^\n\r]* DW_AT_encoding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113864 Bug ID: 113864 Summary: FAIL: rust/debug/chartype.rs scan-assembler 0x10[ \t][^\n\r]* DW_AT_encoding Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rust/113473] rust/compile/iterators1.rs etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113473 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rust/113472] rust/compile/issue-1446.rs FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113472 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/113847] [14 Regression] 10% slowdown of 462.libquantum on AMD Ryzen 7700X and Ryzen 7900X

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113847 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug rust/107700] Several testsuite failures on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107700 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Regarding const-issue1440.rs and issue-1432.rs, here are the errors on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11: FAIL: rust/compile/const-issue1440.rs (test for excess errors) Excess errors:

[Bug rust/107700] Several testsuite failures on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107700 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/113792] error: '__size_t' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113792 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug c++/112436] SFINAE-unfriendly error on throwing pointer to incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112436 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libfortran/110651] libgfortran.spec links twice with libgcc spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110651 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- AFAICT, this was fixed on trunk by r14-6721-gd31c54c7da7661 (which seems to have a reference to the PR so not sure why it did not show up here). I think we need this on any open branch which we want to work

[Bug c++/113789] [13/14 Regression] ICE on P2266/C++23 `decltype(throw x)` where x is move-eligible parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113789 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- The ICE was fixed by r14-8903-g3a3e0f1b46a3ad. But I'm not done here yet.

[Bug target/112864] Many libphobos tests FAIL on macOS 12+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112864 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] Many|Many libphobos tests FAIL

[Bug target/112863] Many obj-c++ tests FAIL on macOS 14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112863 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] Many|Many obj-c++ tests FAIL on

[Bug target/112862] gfortran.dg coarray tests FAIL on macOS 12+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112862 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] gfortran.dg |gfortran.dg coarray tests

[Bug target/112861] Most gdc tests FAIL on macOS 12+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112861 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] Most gdc|Most gdc tests FAIL on

[Bug c++/113853] implicit move in throw in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113853 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/113734] [14 regression] libarchive miscompiled (fails libarchive_test_read_format_rar5_extra_field_version test) since r14-8768-g85094e2aa6dba7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113734 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- Created attachment 57379 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57379=edit test.c Here's an initial stab at a standalone testcase. I'm going to try reduce it now.

[Bug fortran/113845] ice in gfc_get_array_ss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113845 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5) > I'm wondering if we need to worry about other actual > arguments. I note > > subroutine test_adjustl(x) > character(*) :: x(100) >x =

[Bug target/113679] long long minus double with gcc -m32 produces different results than other compilers or gcc -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113679 --- Comment #13 from Дилян Палаузов --- For clang being buggy from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113679#c11 I filled https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/81358 .

[Bug c++/113854] the expression 'is_invocable_v ... evaluated to 'false'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113854 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- *unintended symptom deep inside a template

[Bug c++/113854] the expression 'is_invocable_v ... evaluated to 'false'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113854 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- And those are not library internals, they're the public concepts defined in the standard. You can look them up to see what they mean, but the problem boils down to what's shown at the end: your predicate

[Bug c++/113854] the expression 'is_invocable_v ... evaluated to 'false'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113854 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Anybody who promised concepts will always result in better errors was lying or misinformed. They have the potential to help, but it takes real effort to make it happen. ranges::find_if is constrained to

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Comment on attachment 57378 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57378 patch under test s/jumpl/jmpl/

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 57378 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57378=edit patch under test This implements the common case for an i386 trampoline (and, in this respect, matches the

[Bug c++/107126] -Wc++20-compat should complain about template-id in out of class definition for destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107126 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97202] GCC reports an error: expected unqualified-id before ‘short’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/113455] ROUNDING: IEEE Standard: Missing decimal rounding mode 'nearest, ties away from zero' for decimalxxx datatypes.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113455 --- Comment #7 from newbie-02 --- > (and GCC doesn't implement the FENV_DEC_ROUND pragma to set a constant > rounding mode in a particular scope) here we are leaving my level of knowledge about internals. Let me formulate from a user /

[Bug c++/97202] GCC reports an error: expected unqualified-id before ‘short’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cff174fabd6c980c09aee95db1d9d5c22421761f commit r14-8915-gcff174fabd6c980c09aee95db1d9d5c22421761f Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/107126] -Wc++20-compat should complain about template-id in out of class definition for destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107126 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cff174fabd6c980c09aee95db1d9d5c22421761f commit r14-8915-gcff174fabd6c980c09aee95db1d9d5c22421761f Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113863] New: [14 Regression] ICE verify_ssa failed with -O3 -msse4.1 since r14-8768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113863 Bug ID: 113863 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE verify_ssa failed with -O3 -msse4.1 since r14-8768 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/113724] [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 57377 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57377=edit Fixes the ICE – might paper over a real issue; doesn't fix the run-time issue → TODO + 'data'-issue in PR comment 4

[Bug middle-end/110754] assume create spurious load for volatile variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110754 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39920447f876128ff7942a9cd931021800865894 commit r14-8910-g39920447f876128ff7942a9cd931021800865894 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug ada/113862] New: error: "others" choice not allowed here

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113862 Bug ID: 113862 Summary: error: "others" choice not allowed here Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug tree-optimization/109885] gcc does not generate movmskps and testps instructions (clang does)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |tree-optimization CC|