--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-02-21 01:16 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-trap-1.c
ICEs on powerpc-apple-darwin9
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-02-21 00:59
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-02-23 21:43 ---
Subject: Re: mixed-case suffix for decimal float constants
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Modified:
branches/c-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/c-4_5-branch/libcpp
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-02-24 19:07 ---
Subject: Re: New: -save-temps does not follow the -o
option and instead puts the temp file in the current directory
I've also found this to be a pain when working on glibc, where compilation
commands are run
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-02-27 20:58 ---
Subject: Re: struct with only anonymous unions plus flexible
array member
Anonymous unions are outside the scope of C99, so this issue is purely
about what is most useful for GNU C right now.
However
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-05 13:53 ---
Subject: Re: sizeof object with zero-length array ignores
initializer
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-05 13:31
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-08 21:04 ---
Subject: Re: New: Dist tarball missing file gengtype-lex.c
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, skunk at iskunk dot org wrote:
gengtype-lex.c should not have to be generated, obviously.
That only applies to release tarballs
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-11 22:43 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.target/arm/neon/neon.exp tests for vmov
fail on arm-linux-eabi
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, jules at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
These failures show up because the tests are kind of weak. There's
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-18 14:27 ---
Subject: Re: [Mips] No space for arguments when implicitely
calling __get_tls_addr
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, pinskia at gmail dot com wrote:
__get_tls_addr is a special function and does not have to follow
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-23 20:35 ---
Subject: Re: stddef.h assumes machinee/ansi.h defines
_ANSI_H_
The patch is obviously wrong (it changes the installed headers for all
targets instead of setting USER_H to adjust the list for the target
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-23 20:53 ---
Subject: Re: stddef.h assumes machinee/ansi.h defines
_ANSI_H_
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, prlw1 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote:
--- Comment #6 from prlw1 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-03-23 20:45 ---
(In reply
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-24 13:19 ---
Subject: Re: New: overhaul printf formats and type
casts in testsuite
The testsuite in FSF GCC tests correct behavior of FSF GCC and code
compiled with it. If correct behavior for Ubuntu GCC and code compiled
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-24 13:22
---
Subject: Re: stddef.h assumes machinee/ansi.h defines
_ANSI_H_
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, aran at 100acres dot us wrote:
This is a combination of the other two patches. GCC's version of stddef.h is
still
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-24 13:26 ---
Subject: Re: New: Grammar error in russian localization
We do not maintain the translations in GCC and the Russian team does not
have a Bugzilla account, so you will need to pass your report on to
g...@mx.ru
--- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-24 13:32
---
Subject: Re: stddef.h assumes machinee/ansi.h defines
_ANSI_H_
I see you did in fact send the stddef.h changes to gcc-patches - thanks
for splitting up the separate logical parts of the patch (which is always
--- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-24 16:04
---
Subject: Re: stddef.h assumes machinee/ansi.h defines
_ANSI_H_
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, aran at 100acres dot us wrote:
Joseph,
The fixincludes changes fix another issue. Should I create
a new bug
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-25 00:45 ---
Subject: Re: compat tests for flexible array members
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
Flexible array member isn't allowed in union:
However, a union may contain a structure
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-26 13:04 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in print_operand if using -mfloat-gprs
w/ non-854x -mcpu option
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, bje at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
I think this patch should suffice.
All the cases (of options
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-03-29 16:59 ---
Subject: Re: gfc_error formats are not marked
gcc-internal-format in po file
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, bruno at clisp dot org wrote:
The xgettext options that need to be passed to xgettext
--language=GCC-source
--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-01 14:26
---
Subject: Re: stdint.h-related issues (C99 issues)
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:
On *-darwin* we have
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-stdint-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-stdint
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-02 20:09 ---
Subject: Re: Complex __float128 is rejected
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
Is this a parser problem? Compilation fails even for generic:
--cut here--
typedef float DFtype __attribute__
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-02 21:35 ---
Subject: Re: Complex __float128 is rejected
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu wrote:
| Of course, 6.7.2 paragraph 2 does not include _Complex typedef-name in the
| possible sets of type specifiers
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-05 00:07 ---
Subject: Re: New: License for libiberty
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg01286.html; I don't recall
seeing the SC's/FSF's answer to this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32213
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-13 11:30
---
Subject: Re: Paranoia UCB GSL TestFloat libm tests fail
- accuracy of recent gcc math poor
I previously suggested to the crlibm authors that they consider assigning
it to the FSF for contribution to libgcc
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-14 23:26 ---
Subject: Re: New: ICE on valid code
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, edmar at freescale dot com wrote:
Gcc version 4.2.0 configured for e500v2, i.e.:
--target=powerpc-unknown-linux-gnuspe --enable-e500_double
ICE
--- Comment #22 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-15 22:43
---
Subject: Re: Paranoia UCB GSL TestFloat libm tests fail
- accuracy of recent gcc math poor
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, rob1weld at aol dot com wrote:
This is just one number. How many more could there be, how
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-08-17 10:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] spurious exceptions
with -ffloat-store
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
For one, I don't think __real__ X = R; __imag__ X = C; is really nice
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-08-22 01:13 ---
Subject: Re: preprocess should ignore trigraphs in
/* */ comments
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Now in multiple line comments, they should not be warned about.
Unless of course
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-08-22 13:12 ---
Subject: Re: C front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Is the following valid?
typedef int IA[];
typedef int A5[5];
typedef int A10[10
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-08-22 14:52
---
Subject: Re: C front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
As far as I see we still need to re-instantiate transitiveness
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-27 15:34 ---
Subject: Re: New: Missing __builtin_fpclassify
As previously discussed, this builtin would either need to be used in the
form
#define fpclassify(x) __builtin_fpclassify(FP_INFINITE, FP_NAN, FP_NORMAL
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-27 16:20 ---
Subject: Re: Missing __builtin_fpclassify
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
As previously discussed,
Didn't know about that. If you have a pointer, I would like to read the
thread.
http
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-12-16 16:44 ---
Subject: Re: casting negative __int128_t to float/double
rounds to nearest multiple of 2048
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
This works OK for 4.3.0, beacuse 4.3 branch implements 128bit
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-05 17:07 ---
Subject: Re: Optimization generates incorrect code
with -frounding-math option (#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not implemented)
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Sorry, -frounding-math does
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-06 15:12 ---
Subject: Re: Optimization generates incorrect code
with -frounding-math option (#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not implemented)
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
I wouldn't read the language
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-06 16:28 ---
Subject: Re: Optimization generates incorrect code
with -frounding-math option (#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not implemented)
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
I see. So basically we need
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-29 13:06 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc-4.2.3-RC1's gctest hangs on
i686-apple-darwin9
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:
I confirm the problem reported by Jack Howarth in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-29 18:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid
code
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
TREE_READONLY isn't modifiable, so I guess that part is quite clear and I'm
also
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-31 23:17 ---
Subject: Re: New: Toplevel compile script is not
executable
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
# ls -l compile
-rw-r--r-- 1 bin bin 3707 Jul 13 2005 compile
Causes gcc configure
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-09 19:29 ---
Subject: Re: New: make pdf has missing file in 4.3-20080208
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, hal at oz dot net wrote:
! I can't find file `../../gcc-4.3-20080208/gcc/../libiberty/at-file.texi'.
This looks like you
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-10 20:25 ---
Subject: Re: make pdf has missing file in 4.3-20080208
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de wrote:
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
@@ -3653,7 +3653,7 @@ gcc-vers.texi: $(BASEVER
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-12 22:56 ---
Subject: Re: makeinfo drops hyphens from srcdir path
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, skunk at iskunk dot org wrote:
That was my first thought as well, but consider that the conversion from --
to - (and --- to --) makes
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-12 20:15 ---
Subject: Re: make pdf has missing file in 4.3-20080208
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de wrote:
Thanks. Please note that I don't have write access yet (so if you want
to make sure it gets
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-12 20:11 ---
Subject: Re: makeinfo drops hyphens from srcdir path
I think it's a bug in makeinfo that it does this, and should be fixed
there.
In any case, patches to this code need testing with dvi or pdf output
(which
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-14 23:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] exp-expf
transformation incorrect with -fmath-errno
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Clarification would be much appreciated here, and I would
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-15 21:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] exp-expf
transformation incorrect with -fmath-errno
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Ok, so with -fmath-errno the middle-end has to assume
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-17 22:48 ---
Subject: Re: Documentation incorrect for -fcx-limited-range
The bug report appears correct, though you should be referring to N1256
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf, the C99
standard
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-17 23:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] missed evaluation of VM
array type when used as a cast
My view remains as I said in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00039.html: front ends
should make
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-06 10:40 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc manpage contains
@option-Wstrict-overflow=1
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
invoke.texi contains:
@table @option
@item -Wstrict-overflow=1
It should use
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-19 19:54 ---
Subject: Re: Warning when passing a pointer to a const array
to a function that expects a pointer to a non-cast one
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, jbeulich at novell dot com wrote:
Isn't this the same as 16602 (which I
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-26 12:38 ---
Subject: Re: Warning when passing a pointer to a const array
to a function that expects a pointer to a non-cast one
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, jozef dot behran at krs dot sk wrote:
Could you give me reference
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-26 12:42 ---
Subject: Re: Warning when passing a pointer to a const array
to a function that expects a pointer to a non-cast one
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, jozef dot behran at krs dot sk wrote:
And another point: Whether C/C
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-10-26 14:45 ---
Subject: Re: New: Empty macro definitions not
considered equal
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
#define A(a)
#define A(b)
g++-4.3 -S t.C
t.C:2:1: error: A redefined
t.C:1:1
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-10-28 21:13 ---
Subject: Re: New: error: array type has incomplete element
type in system header
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
This was discussed in this thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-02
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-12 16:29 ---
Subject: Re: Poor precision of complex division __divdc3 in
64-bit on Intel
Excess overflows in complex arithmetic is noted on
http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html but I don't think there's a specific
bug
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-15 23:53 ---
Subject: Re: atomic builtins not supported on i686?
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Because the default arch for i686-linux-gnu is i386.
Which is a stupid inconsistency and arguably
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-16 16:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] spurious exceptions
with -ffloat-store
The failure still appears with a compiler from revision 130227, after the
patch for PR 34099 was committed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-26 12:44
---
Subject: Re: Empty macro definitions not considered
equal
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
I see. But sth changed in the cpp defaults for C++ in 4.3 as things
that were previously
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-26 14:28
---
Subject: Re: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list
The feature request is just as relevant as it was. Part of the point of a
bug database is to track issues over time for as long as they are relevant
rather than
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-11-26 14:43
---
Subject: Re: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
The feature request is only worth a bug report if you actually intend to
persue
the request. Just
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-08 14:49 ---
Subject: Re: New: Stage 2 Werror - trunk revision
145459 - libcpp/identifiers.c:113: error: variably modified
'proxy_assertion_broken'
at file scope
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, rob1weld at aol dot com wrote:
/home
--- Comment #18 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-08 15:49
---
Subject: Re: stdint.h-related issues (C99 issues)
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, hp at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Adding the libstdc++ regressions I've seen as a dependent, see PR39644 comment
#23.
(That is, the PR448
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-08 22:54 ---
Subject: Re: sizeof object with zero-length array ignores
initializer
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, b07584 at freescale dot com wrote:
--- Comment #8 from b07584 at freescale dot com 2009-04-08 21:36
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-11 12:51 ---
Subject: Re: New: signed overflow in loop
induction variable: missing warning and wrong code
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, edwintorok at gmail dot com wrote:
Testcase:
#include stdio.h
int
main ()
{
int
--- Comment #23 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-11 16:30
---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] operand of pre-/postin-/decrement
not promoted
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
On no-undefined-overflow branch the FE can do the increment
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-20 17:30 ---
Subject: Re: real.c rounding not perfect
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
How about chucking real.c and using mpfr_t as the internal representation for
real numbers inside GCC? I guess
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-21 10:20 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc.target/i386/excess-precision-*.c
assume the default -mfp-math does not include SSE
Probably all six excess precision tests should have explicit -mfpmath=387.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-23 19:00 ---
Subject: Re: New: Wrong translation of output gcc
-c -Q -march=core2 --help=target to Russian
Please report all translation bugs to the relevant language teams (in this
case g...@mx.ru).
--
http
--- Comment #24 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-23 19:01
---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4
in libstdc++ not exported anymore
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #21 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-29 11:33
---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Revision 146817 caused
unaligned access in gcc.dg/torture/pr26565.c
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, matz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
The user should have the possibility to announce
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-29 15:56 ---
Subject: Re: Inadequate gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
So the issues are
1. We want to test as many different combination as possible
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-30 10:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ./plugin-version.h:11:
error: 'gcc_version' defined but not used
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Really I think plugin support is flawed. There should
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-02 09:34 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc does not install appropriate plugin
headers
On Sat, 2 May 2009, bradh at frogmouth dot net wrote:
Writing a plugin requires use of a range of headers (such as gcc-plugin.h)
which
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-06 11:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE during gimplify_init_constructor
On Tue, 5 May 2009, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Reduced testcase, maybe due to the C const expression changes(?)
I see nothing
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-06 20:16 ---
Subject: Re: New: plugin tests don't work with multilib
On Wed, 6 May 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
On Linux/Intel64, I got
Executing on host: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-08 10:19 ---
Subject: Re: spurious format string warnings
On Fri, 8 May 2009, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
is happening here, it is assuming %qE does not take an argument). I don't see
an issue really except you
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-13 16:50 ---
Subject: Re: rint from gcc.c-torture/execute miscompiled
with -march=i486
On Wed, 13 May 2009, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
Adding -ffloat-store also fixes these failures.
ieee.exp already uses -ffloat
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-14 12:01 ---
Subject: Re: spurious format string warnings
On Thu, 14 May 2009, bje at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Andrew wrote:
GCC can assume %qE means anything from just printing E in quotes
Can you explain
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-19 16:15 ---
Subject: Re: No rule to make target `proto', needed by
`native'. Stop.
protoize and unprotoize were removed in 4.5 having been deprecated in 4.4
- either some reference did not get removed, or an old build
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-22 10:22 ---
Subject: Re: exception propagation support not enabled
in libstdc++ 4.4 on {armeabi,hppa}-linux
On Fri, 22 May 2009, mikpe at it dot uu dot se wrote:
Created an attachment (id=17900)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-29 09:42 ---
Subject: Re: New: Request a single option to turn off
all instructions which can cause #TS
This sounds very much like the long-requested -fno-implicit-fp /
-mno-implicit-fp option. We have an implementation
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-05-29 10:06 ---
Subject: Re: New: Using the -V option makes the compiler to
exit with 0 exit code on error
The pexecute interface returns a status value from waitpid from the driver
executed with -V, and gcc.c then passes
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-06 22:22
---
Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] ICE with __complex__
double
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
That is why we shouldn't close a bug report without checking
in a testcase.
Closing
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-08 09:40 ---
Subject: Re: GCC defines UNICODE instead of _UNICODE
for -municode
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
to define UNICODE is absolutely correct. The define _UNICODE is fiction (but I
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-09 17:42 ---
Subject: Re: CLooG header files are not -Wc++-compat
ready
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, spop at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
2009-06-09 Sebastian Pop sebastian@amd.com
PR bootstrap/40103
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-09 18:34 ---
Subject: Re: New: possible integer wrong code bug
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, regehr at cs dot utah dot edu wrote:
reg...@john-home:~$ cat foo.c
#include stdio.h
int foo(int y)
{
return (((unsigned short)y
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-10 00:58 ---
Subject: Re: New: cos gets replaced by sincos somehow, which
doesn't exist on system
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, thekevinday at gmail dot com wrote:
When I compiling lcms or ncurses I get: undefined reference
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-15 01:01 ---
Subject: Re: New: Option -I and POSIX conformance (c99 utility)
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, vincent at vinc17 dot org wrote:
As you can see, there is a difference for standard system include directories,
for which
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-15 10:57 ---
Subject: Re: Option -I and POSIX conformance (c99 utility)
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, vincent at vinc17 dot org wrote:
This may be true for standard headers, but system directories don't contain
only standard headers
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-15 13:06 ---
Subject: Re: Option -I and POSIX conformance (c99 utility)
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, vincent at vinc17 dot org wrote:
--- Comment #4 from vincent at vinc17 dot org 2009-06-15 11:59 ---
(In reply to comment
--- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-16 17:26
---
Subject: Re: wrong size of struct with some bit-fields on
ppc-eabi
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, mcvick_e at iname dot com wrote:
Furthermore, as stated numerous comments back with a link to the actual PPC
ABI
--- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-16 20:03
---
Subject: Re: sizeof() and __attribute__ broken with
bit-fields on ppc-eabi
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, mcvick_e at iname dot com wrote:
Thanks for the update. I finally feel as though this is getting some teeth
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-17 10:13 ---
Subject: Re: linux-eabi.h:79:36: error: identifier not
is a special operator name in C++
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Could you specify which version of the source tree
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-17 13:35 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc 4.3 no longer warns about missing newlines
at end of files (regression from 4.2)
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, rlerallut at free dot fr wrote:
When compiling a C or C++ program with gcc 4.3
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-17 13:59 ---
Subject: Re: gcc 4.3 no longer warns about missing newlines at
end of files (regression from 4.2)
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, rlerallut at free dot fr wrote:
(In reply to comment #2)
This is deliberate; see bug
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-17 14:28 ---
Subject: Re: gcc 4.3 no longer warns about missing newlines at
end of files (regression from 4.2)
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, rlerallut at free dot fr wrote:
And what happened to configuration flags ?
Configuration
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-18 21:08 ---
Subject: Re: definitions of __builtin_abs() and abs() function
in one module not diagnosed
What happened to the patch for PR 32455 to disallow __builtin_*
declarations? That PR indicates it was approved for 4.5
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-18 21:49 ---
Subject: Re: -std=c99 does not enable c99 mode in Solaris
C library
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, heydowns at borg dot com wrote:
Was looking at modifying the spec to produce the desired results and
contribute
patch
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-26 22:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: Invalid -Wc++-compat warning about stringized
C++ operator name
A closely related case is:
#define foo not used
There is no important difference in the meaning of this between C and C
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-07-04 11:49 ---
Subject: Re: -std=c99 does not enable c99 mode in Solaris
C library
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
I wasn't sure exactly how to handle the various -std=gnu* modes, so I left
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-07-04 11:54 ---
Subject: Re: 32-bit pointers on 64-bit operating systems
The natural analogy would be with MIPS n32 (an ILP32 ABI for 64-bit MIPS
hardware), which also indicates the directory names (/lib32) to use.
There would
501 - 600 of 2017 matches
Mail list logo
