http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55267
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55202
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-10
18:32:27 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Sat Nov 10 18:32:23 2012
New Revision: 193393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193393
Log:
2012-11-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55202
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55269
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-11
06:21:55 UTC ---
In 4.8, GCC is now written in C++ rather than C, so I don't think it matter
anymore as there is no macro define in C++ for complex.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-11
17:24:19 UTC ---
The pointer is used in *li = 0; statement.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
03:49:22 UTC ---
Can you explain how you hit this with what patch and what testcase on what
target?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55280
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
06:36:20 UTC ---
A a(B()); is a function declaration and not a variable declaration. This is
one of the ambiguities of the parsing which the C++ standard decided
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
17:01:57 UTC ---
Also this ICE is really the kernel killing the program as it ran out of
memory or it was over one of the ulimits. Most likely ran of memory.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
21:55:11 UTC ---
I think this is because:
(subreg:SF (reg/v:V2SF 167 [ a ]) 0)))
is invalid to begin with. Yes we don't reject it but I think we should.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46888
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13
01:18:52 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg00952.html
Will improve the testcase at the tree level for little-endian:
_4 = (unsigned char) a_3(D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
02:51:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 28693
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28693
Patch which I am testing right now
Once my testing finishes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
03:18:18 UTC ---
Does this still happen?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
03:20:16 UTC ---
Does this still happen?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
03:40:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Created attachment 28693 [details]
Patch which I am testing right now
Once my testing finishes (including installing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
04:31:44 UTC ---
libmudflap has the similar issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55336
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55339
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
20:29:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
libmudflap has the similar issue.
Actually the libmudflap is fixed by fixing libstdc++. Anyways I have a full
fix now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
03:36:35 UTC ---
here is the most reduced testcase.
cat foo1.cc EOF
templatetypename _CharT struct basic_string
{
struct _Rep {_CharT* _M_refdata() throw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55349
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
03:46:48 UTC ---
http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=20862
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55349
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55338
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
17:27:50 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-11/msg00259.html
Covers why this still invalid code.
See also 13935.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53024
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
18:18:16 UTC ---
I don't think we can ever support vector size of non power 2 size.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55361
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
22:32:03 UTC ---
The Comeau C/C++ online tester does not error out on this testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55361
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
22:38:47 UTC ---
I don't think this is a gcc bug as access control is always done only at
template-instantiation time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54342
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55378
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|Mingw, cygwin |i?86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55380
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55377
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-19
21:43:46 UTC ---
The llvm-gcc failure is recorded as PR 55387.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55387
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55387
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55400
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55404
Bug #: 55404
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Lots of failures at -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55404
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55404
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20
00:15:14 UTC ---
From http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html :
# Diagnostics that used to complain about passing non-POD types to ... or
jumping past the declaration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55406
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55391
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55403
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55397
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20
05:23:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Note that this will be incompatible with what clang uses
(http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html#has_feature
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55421
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20
23:44:52 UTC ---
I think this was fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-11/msg00621.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55421
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55411
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-21
02:13:37 UTC ---
Can you create a testcase which uses pthread_* directly?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-21
04:10:18 UTC ---
Can you provide the preprocessed source?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53475
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55424
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-21
13:07:00 UTC ---
*** Bug 55424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-22
04:13:58 UTC ---
Comeau online tester (which is EDG based) says:
ComeauTest.c, line 20: error: a nonstatic member reference must be relative
to a
specific
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55449
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-24
06:37:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Time to adopt ICC.
There is only so much resources to support older versions of GCC. If you want
support for older
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55460
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-25
00:49:05 UTC ---
// NOTE: call to filter depends on template argument, thus have to be
// resolved at instantiation point.
// BUG: But it doesn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55460
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-25
01:56:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Not sure I understand your comment - ADL with respect to what: my::filter or
the ::operator? Can you elaborate please
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55468
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55490
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55504
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55505
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
02:29:53 UTC ---
Sounds like a case of a missing check for VECTOR modes when it is doing the
subreg as a truncation optimization.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55512
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
09:33:32 UTC ---
I thought this was fixed with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg02271.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55512
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55507
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
19:40:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
On 11/28/2012 1:25 PM, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Since this is _powtf2, you probably need --enable-long-double-128
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
22:11:35 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Nov 28 22:11:29 2012
New Revision: 193910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193910
Log:
2012-11-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55540
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-29
22:21:25 UTC ---
-9223372036854775808 is two different tokens. unary minus and the literal
9223372036854775808. 9223372036854775808 does not fit into long so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55544
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.3.1 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55560
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55589
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-04
10:27:26 UTC ---
How did you configure GCC?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55602
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06
09:12:24 UTC ---
I think there is a duplicated bug of this one where we closed it as behaviors
correctly but I don't know the number right now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39464
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06
19:29:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
warning to actual sign differences only, i.e.
else if (warn_pointer_sign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55619
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-08
08:05:54 UTC ---
I think it would be better to rewrite this using intrinsics than depending on
the register allocator.
You have 3 register inputs, 4 register outputs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55619
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-08
08:29:53 UTC ---
I think it is obvious what is happening. The c++ front-end is propagating the
const vector.
Does a const int cause a similar issue if so the inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55104
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55596
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55595
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55578
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55606
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FIXME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55613
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55601
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55560
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55589
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-09
00:48:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 28902
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28902
Patch which might work
Can you try this patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39900
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55420
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 34641 matches
Mail list logo