--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-08-23 15:16 ---
Subject: Re: remove_phi_node attempts removal
of a phi node resized by resize_phi_node
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 13:40 +, hosking at cs dot purdue dot edu
wrote:
--- Comment #4 from hosking at cs dot
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-09-24 00:34 ---
Subject: Re: optimzation breaks floating point exception flag
reading
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 23:02 +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
In that case you have a bug that is not a duplicate of the lack
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-14 18:08 ---
Subject: Re: Issues with -Wchar-subscripts
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 17:52 +, h dot b dot furuseth at usit dot uio
dot no wrote:
Also you forgot one thing '%' does not have to match up with the ANSI
character set so
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-14 18:26 ---
Subject: Re: [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as
template
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 18:25 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 18
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-15 03:29 ---
Subject: Re: g++ fails to overload on language linkage
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 03:24 +, gcc-bugzilla at kayari dot org wrote:
--- Comment #13 from gcc-bugzilla at kayari dot org 2006-10-15 03:24
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-23 21:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] optmization generates warning for casts
On 23 Oct 2006 17:30:22 -, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is wrong that we are optimizing the expression
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-14 10:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE: tree check:
expected class 'constant', have 'declaration' (var_decl) in
build_vector,
at tree.c:973
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:29 +, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-06-24 01:48 ---
Subject: Re: loses type in debug info
On Jun 23, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Ilya N. Golubev wrote:
Next time please don't paste the preprocessed source in gccbug or
in the
comments section in bugzilla.
Please reverse
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-06-26 16:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] inliner introduces unnecessary type conversions
On Jun 26, 2006, at 6:45 AM, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-26
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-07-15 14:56 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared
On Jul 15, 2006, at 10:45 PM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:
Because the rules in config.gcc say so:
And that is not why, but that is what
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-24 06:32 ---
Subject: Re: wrong code generated with -O2 on sh4-linux
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 06:20 +, sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp 2006-11-24 06:20
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 04:51 ---
Subject: Re: Linking fails because __ZdlPv can't be a
weak definition
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 04:49 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 05:51 ---
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] badly formatted warnings for SRA
replacements used uninitialized
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 05:46 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
That fixed most of the failures
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 17:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] [Linux] ICE in
insert_into_preds_of_block
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 08:06 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-30 18:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression]
internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:362
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 15:55 +, dimock at csail dot mit dot edu
wrote:
(2a) [portability and performance
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-01 18:19 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 11:37 +, pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
wrote:
Must someone present this to gcc-patches or will you do it yourself?
I am going
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-08 18:17 ---
Subject: Re: bogus diagnostic with -pedantic?: format '%p';
expects type 'void*', but argument 2 has type 'A*'
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 11:07 +, vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org wrote:
Just for my personal education
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-10 01:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE
genautomata.c:6060
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 01:19 +, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
--- Comment #6 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-12-10 01:19 ---
Fail
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-13 16:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression]
gcc.dg/pr19633-1.c fails on the mainline
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 14:12 +, dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
Works for me with @119760 (mem-ssa) on all arches (x86, x86_64
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-23 18:50 ---
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV on operator==(valarraybool,
bool)
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 11:17 +, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
wrote:
I don't remember I ever used this funky __builtin_expect.
valarray
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-01 23:37 ---
Subject: Re: '#define false FALSE' undefines '#define FALSE
false'
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:43 +, h8_spam at sonic dot net wrote:
Right, but since true and false are keywords, I would expect the
#define
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-02 01:12 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcc/libssp/ssp.c:177: ICE: in
cgraph_expand_all_functions, at cgraphunit.c:1220
This should have been fixed by:
2007-01-01 Jan Hubicka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Pinski [EMAIL
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-16 03:04 ---
Subject: Re: Integer Overflow detection code optimised away,
-fwrapv broken
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 02:33 +, tg at mirbsd dot org wrote:
The real shame is an
attitude of we won't fix it, either use -O0
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-22 01:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 only] bug with TRANSFER() and -O2
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 11:19 +, pault at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Were you going to apply this to 4.2, together with revision 119211, or
will you
close them
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-01-28 19:04 ---
Subject: Re: newlib targets ICEs in
expand_builtin_int_roundingfn
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:22 +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-24 14
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-03-09 23:05 ---
Subject: Re: Revision 121302 causes 30% performance regression
On 9 Mar 2007 23:00:55 -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than that, more precise alias information
can cause more
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-03-19 17:52 ---
Subject: Re: pseudo-optimzation with sincos/cexpi
On 19 Mar 2007 12:43:49 -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since sin() and cos() are non trivial functions, I am very surprised
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-03-23 07:57 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FRE ignores bit-field truncation (C and C++
front-end don't produce bit-field truncation
On 23 Mar 2007 05:01:00 -, spark at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-03-23 08:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FRE ignores bit-field truncation (C and C++
front-end don't produce bit-field truncation
On 3/23/07, Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 05:01:00 -, spark at gcc dot
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-05-08 15:59 ---
Subject: Re: Loop IM and other optimizations harmful for -fopenmp
On 8 May 2007 14:44:16 -, dnovillo at acm dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original code did not have a race condition. The compiler
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-05-08 19:45 ---
Subject: Re: Loop IM and other optimizations harmful for -fopenmp
On 8 May 2007 18:08:26 -, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58772
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 21, 2013, at 2:35 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58772
Tobias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54304
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2012-08-17 19:13:50 UTC ---
This is a darwin only issue.
On Aug 17, 2012 12:07 PM, tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
I have a fix which I hope to share in the next few weeks.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 30, 2013, at 3:31 AM, evstupac at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
All of these functions overflow the loop induction variable so only -fwrapv
will provide the behavior you want for all of the functions. The inconsistent
behavior is due
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60533
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com ---
On Mar 15, 2014, at 7:59 PM, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60533
--- Comment #7 from Bill
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-06 03:32 ---
Subject: Re: gcc 4.4.0 20090101 - gcc/config/i386/sol2-10.h uses USE_GAS
which is undefined
On Jan 5, 2009, at 7:01 PM, rob1weld at aol dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 21:15 ---
Subject: Re: New: Incorrect warning/error when compiling with a typedef'ed
ptr return type
On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:44 PM, gnu at bluedreamer dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
When a pointer to type
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 21:39 ---
Subject: Re: New: %s substituted with regular word can't be properly
translated
Well template here might be consider the keyword template. So we
either have template argument or just argument. Translating template
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 18:27 ---
Subject: Re: man page: -fschedule-insns documentation
On Jan 8, 2009, at 9:44 AM, tim at klingt dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from tim at klingt dot org 2009-01-08 17:44
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 19:16 ---
Subject: Re: New: bogus 'changes meaning' error?
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:22 AM, pluto at agmk dot net gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
following code snipet is reducted testcase from external application.
g
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 00:11 ---
Subject: Re: Dist tarball is missing (Bison-generated) java/parse-scan.c
On Jan 10, 2009, at 3:59 PM, rob1weld at aol dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-13 11:28 ---
Subject: Re: New: Diagnose and treat (-2.0)**2.0 properly
On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:08 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
Found at:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-13 19:22 ---
Subject: Re: New: gcj emitting incorrect code
On Jan 13, 2009, at 8:03 AM, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
I originally found this problem when trying to compile a Java
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-16 11:46 ---
Subject: Re: loop iv detection failure
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:57 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-16 18:33 ---
Subject: Re: field-insensitive PTA causes libstdc++ miscompiles
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:30 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
(void *)((intptr_t)iptr + (intptr_t)p - (intptr_t)iptr
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-16 18:44 ---
Subject: Re: field-insensitive PTA causes libstdc++ miscompiles
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-22 09:17 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:398
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 1:00 AM, bonzini at gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-23 04:24 ---
Subject: Re: New: CX isn't preserved with shift
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:54 PM, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
On x86, CX is used for shift. If CX is used
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-23 04:39 ---
Subject: Re: CX isn't preserved with shift
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2009, at 8:34 PM, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-24 22:33 ---
Subject: Re: if () block not true but a command in it is still in effect
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2009, at 2:24 PM, jellegeerts at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #6 from
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-26 11:12 ---
Subject: Re: New: Missing feature documentation
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 26, 2009, at 2:35 AM, piotr dot wyderski at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
The website
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 11:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] NULL pointers always considered distinct
by PTA, even with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:02 AM, bonzini at gnu dot org gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 11:27 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] missing constraints for pointers
accessed directly via their address
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:15 AM, bonzini at gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-29 17:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] wrong code building libgsf
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:01 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 02:41 ---
Subject: Re: New: Decimal floating-point exception flags done wrong
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2009, at 6:00 PM, tydeman at tybor dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
Using gcc 4.3.2-7 on Intel Pentium 4
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-03 04:35 ---
Subject: Re: stage 3 libgfortran build fails
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2009, at 8:33 PM, tony_eckert at umsl dot edu
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from tony_eckert at umsl dot edu
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-03 15:44 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] Incorrect type diagnostic on substracting
casted char pointers
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 3, 2009, at 5:56 AM, bonzini at gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-18 10:30 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets
()); ICE
This is mostly likely due to my no micro code patch. I see what causes
it tommorow.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:55
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-25 13:37 ---
Subject: Re: Optimize away only set but not used variable
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 25, 2009, at 1:43 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-07 04:35 ---
Subject: Re: gcc 4.3.3 miscompiles when -finline-small-functions is used
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 6, 2009, at 8:30 PM, galtgendo at o2 dot pl gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #16 from
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-08 21:56 ---
Subject: Re: New: Dist tarball missing file gengtype-lex.c
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 8, 2009, at 1:28 PM, skunk at iskunk dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
Bootstrapping gcc-4.4-20090306(.tar.bz2
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-09 15:57 ---
Subject: Re: Excessive optimization issue
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:36 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-09 15:59 ---
Subject: Re: Parse error in stack when user declares template-name c
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #7 from
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-12 04:42 ---
Subject: Re: New: The Driver hides undefined reference messages from shared
libs (but not object files) in linker phase
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:27 PM, rob1weld at aol dot com
gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-14 06:03 ---
Subject: Re: New: strange aliasing warnings compiling pymol under gcc 4.4
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:11 PM, howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-14 06:14 ---
Subject: Re: The Driver hides undefined reference messages from shared libs
(but not object files) in linker phase
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2009, at 8:54 PM, rob1weld at aol dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-15 21:15 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.4 regression]
__iso_c_binding_c_f_procpoin...@gfortran_1.0 missing in libgfortran
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 15, 2009, at 2:02 PM, doko at ubuntu dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-16 08:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE : in compare_values_warnv, at
tree-vrp.c:1073
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2009, at 1:15 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-18 14:22 ---
Subject: Re: New: [Mips] No space for arguments when implicitely calling
__get_tls_addr
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 18, 2009, at 7:05 AM, joel dot porquet at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
Mips
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-03-19 16:01 ---
Subject: Re: New: Incorrect code at -O2 and -O3
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:38 AM, jk500500 at yahoo dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
The attached test program -- which I extracted
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-06 09:10 ---
Subject: Re: optimize unsigned-add overflow test on x86 to use cpu flags from
addl
And BTW - wrapping is undefined operation.
One for signed integers for unsigned it is actually defined as
wrapping and the reporter
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-12 17:56 ---
Subject: Re: Unnecessary conversion from short to unsigend short breaks
vectorization
On 12 Jun 2007 17:53:19 -, gangren at google dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm aware of integral promotion. But not quite
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-14 00:52 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Incorrect stack sharing causing removal of live
code
On 14 Jun 2007 00:46:28 -, dougkwan at google dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I saw the code there yesterday and I
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-14 01:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Incorrect stack sharing causing removal of live
code
On 14 Jun 2007 01:09:16 -, dougkwan at google dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless the compiler can prove that f() does
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-14 02:56 ---
Subject: Re: Thread race segfault in std::string::append with -O and -s
bug 21334 seems to deal with multiple threads accessing the same shared object
at the same time. However, the sample code provided here involves
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-15 15:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Miscompilation with -O1
On 15 Jun 2007 15:12:02 -, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When (and if) I get some time after my PhD defence (next monday), I'll try
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-20 13:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Miscompilation with -O1
did this fix test OK ? Since it fixes the CP2K issue, I would hope that it
could be posted for review soon.
I can't get to testing this patch fully until Friday
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-21 13:47 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:7109
You shouldn't introduce calls to langhooks. Why not use mode_for_size?
I was just copying code from fold-const.c. I have the mode already, I
need an integer tree
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-24 10:27 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Segmentation fault in
build_classic_dist_vector_1() at tree-data-ref.c:2700
On 6/24/07, Sebastian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/24/07, Sebastian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-24 10:33 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Segmentation fault in
build_classic_dist_vector_1() at tree-data-ref.c:2700
On 6/24/07, Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are the operands of different type at that point
--- Comment #28 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-24 11:12 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran - incorrect run time results
On 24 Jun 2007 10:51:42 -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) when compiled with 4.1, g95 gives ICE on derived type I/O when compiled
--- Comment #30 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-24 19:37 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran - incorrect run time results
On 24 Jun 2007 19:28:45 -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #29 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-06-24 19:28
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-26 15:20 ---
Subject: Re: hard-coded memory limit ? f951: out of memory with '-O1
-fbounds-check'
On 26 Jun 2007 14:59:27 -, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
f951: out of memory allocating 4064 bytes after
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-26 21:59 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] attribute always_inline - sorry, unimplemented:
recursive inlining
On 26 Jun 2007 21:55:34 -, rguenther at suse dot de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a hard time deciding if 3.4
--- Comment #120 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-27 09:37 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
On 27 Jun 2007 08:24:46 -, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# BUG
FCFLAGS = -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -march=native
So -ffast-math
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-06-27 15:41 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE in build2_stat, at tree.c:3074
On 27 Jun 2007 15:37:26 -, falk at debian dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #7 from falk at debian dot org 2007-06-27 15:37
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-04 20:07 ---
Subject: Re: -pg seemingly causes miscompilation
On 4 Jul 2007 19:17:22 -, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b.s:
.LCFI15:
cmpl$9, __cp_log_handling_MOD_stack_pointer(%rip
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-08 10:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Inliner not setting has_volatile_ops
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 12:31 ---
This doesn't ICE any longer on the trunk.
But that does not mean
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-12 15:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
On 12 Jul 2007 14:15:06 -, ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
static void
-hide (tree decl)
-{
+hide (tree
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 05:19 ---
Subject: Re: Cannot build cross compiler for Solaris: configure: error: Link
tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
On 17 Jul 2007 05:15:47 -, cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 10:26 ---
Subject: Re: Profiling not possible with -fopenmp
On 17 Jul 2007 10:24:12 -, jensseidel at users dot sf dot net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An Open MPI related discussion about atomic operations happened
the last
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-19 17:56 ---
Subject: Re: missed optimization after inline functions with multiple return
statements
On 19 Jul 2007 17:52:14 -, manuelle at ee dot ethz dot ch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your testcase from bug 32810 does the right
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-25 09:12 ---
Subject: Re: wrong alignment or incorrect address computation in vectorized
code on Pentium 4 SSE
On 25 Jul 2007 08:40:09 -, dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
In the meantime, would you please
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 16:51 ---
Subject: Re: warning for memset with zero size
On 26 Jul 2007 13:57:41 -, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that is a sensible feature request, am I missing something Andrew?
memset
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-06 12:43 ---
Subject: Re: missed memcpy - movdqa optimization.
On 6 Aug 2007 12:42:18 -, pluto at agmk dot net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
moreover i'm wondering why gcc uses movdqa for unaligned loads?
Because __m128i is assumed
--- Comment #26 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-12 23:07 ---
Subject: Re: [win32] Using 'con' as assigned file generates Fortran runtime
error: File 'con' does not exist
On 12 Aug 2007 22:45:07 -, steven dot chapel at sbcglobal dot net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-19 21:39 ---
Subject: Re: -march=native is not supported under x86 darwin
On 19 Aug 2007 21:12:22 -, dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x86 darwin should be able to re-use the implementation from
rs6000/driver
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-22 23:42 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr32912-[12].c (test for excess errors)
On 22 Aug 2007 23:39:50 -, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. Would it be ok to make this declaration static
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-12-10 12:04 ---
Subject: Re: New: Tree optimization pipeline needs re-tuning
On 10 Dec 2007 10:07:09 -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- run DCE after vectorization, the IL is completely hosed
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
