https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-07-10 00:00:00 |2024-1-12
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109943
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109943
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
With the __builtin_unreachable present (thus g >= 0) we simplify
(int)(char)d to d & 255 which causes the VN difference:
Value numbering stmt = _9 = (int) _8;
+d.4_7 is available for d.4_7
+_2 is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
This is a failure to jump-thread because of size limits. If we'd limit
the backward threader the same way as the forward threader we'd optimize this
(--param fsm-scale-path-stmts=1).
--param max-jump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23)
> Couldn't we conditionalize that
> if (!opt_for_fn (node->decl, optimize)
> /* With -Og we do not want to perform IPA inlining of small
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #18 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109781
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109596
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|s390|s390*-*-*
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |accepts-invalid
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108382
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 regression] new test |[13 regression] new test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113126
Bug 113126 depends on bug 113344, which changed state.
Bug 113344 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/pr15784-1.c fails after
r14-7139-g897b95a12b7fe5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113344
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113344
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/alias.cc b/gcc/alias.cc
index b2ec4806d22..0150dd699db 100644
--- a/gcc/alias.cc
+++ b/gcc/alias.cc
@@ -2272,6 +2272,8 @@ static bool
base_alias_check (rtx x, rtx x_base, rtx y, rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.3.1, 13.2.1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112301
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
This caused PR113347 (did you forget to mark the bug fixed?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 110997, which changed state.
Bug 110997 Summary: [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in
cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107687
Bug 107687 depends on bug 110997, which changed state.
Bug 110997 Summary: [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in
cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Summary|[13/14
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
testing a fix (on GENERIC, is_truth_type_for doesn't work for non-vector
compares since we tend to have just 'int' as result)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE during gimplification |[13 Regression] ICE during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113347
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 57047
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57047=edit
preprocessed source
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see
> ./cc1plus -fpreprocessed cross_thread_reduction.cc.ii -quiet -dumpbase-ext
> .cc -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -g -g -O2 -O2 -O2 -Wall -Werror=return-type
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113346
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
This was with r14-7159-g1a80e9558dd7fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113346
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, ra
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
[ 297s] libtool: compile:
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-14.0.0+git7159/obj-x
86_64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-14.0.0+git7159/obj
-x86_64-suse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-11
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110769
Bug 110769 depends on bug 110641, which changed state.
Bug 110641 Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in adjust_loop_info_after_peeling, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc:1023 since r14-2230-g7e904d6c7f2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110641
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110769
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112636
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112636
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113291
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We're endlessly inlining during IPA. Honza, please have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113331
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
These are exception handling region labels, possibly nvptx has no way to do EH.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113326
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> One more thing:
> ```
> vect_shift_0 = vect_value >> { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
> vect_shift_1 = vect_value >> { 4, 5, 6, 7 };
> vect_shift_2 = vect_value >> { 8, 9,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113324
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113322
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113319
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 112740, which changed state.
Bug 112740 Summary: [14 Regression] wrong code with vector compare on riscv64
at -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
I think the issue might be that whoever is creating
__static_initialization_and_destruction_0 fails to honor the active
target pragma. Which means back to my suggestion to have multiple ones
when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 113078, which changed state.
Bug 113078 Summary: [14 regression] reduction of cond_sub is not vectorized.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is the code expects 1-bit masks but doesn't check for it. Of course
it would also work for multi-bit masks, not sure if that would ever trigger -
maybe for vector lowering code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] ICE |ICE verify_gimple failed
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Still the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113172
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113305
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
IMHO REG_UNUSED notes should stay correct or be removed. Instead of a full
solution can we just wipe them in postreload-cse as we know that pass will
break them? Any user then should recompute the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, trying to fix find_base_term isn't enough, init_alias_analysis
find_base_value needs to be adjusted as well. One "obvious" mistake there
is a missing
diff --git a/gcc/alias.cc b/gcc/alias.cc
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113297
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
another option might be to punt for _BitInt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113296
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SPEC 2006 434.zeusmp|[14 Regression] SPEC 2006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113290
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
int a[77];
int bar ();
void foo ()
{
int val;
#define LOOP \
val = bar (); \
for (int i = 0; i < 77; ++i) \
{ \
if (a[i] == val) \
break; \
a[i]++; \
}
#define LOOP10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113197
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Our bisect seed can't bisect lto though...
Honza added this stuff.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
So this:
static void
expand_set_or_cpymem_prologue_epilogue_by_misaligned_moves (rtx destmem, rtx
srcmem,
...
/* See how many bytes we skipped. */
saveddest = expand_simple_binop (GET_MODE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Created attachment 57007 [details]
> gcc14-pr113210.patch
>
> So like this instead?
yes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113284
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
vect_patt_84.19_168 = MIN_EXPR ;
this one is new, but I think there's an existing open bug for the "widening&quo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
1101 - 1200 of 52878 matches
Mail list logo