[Bug java/64044] Java emits bogus .class$ decls

2014-11-24 Thread aph at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64044 Andrew Haley aph at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at redhat dot

[Bug inline-asm/63900] memory constrains needlessly doing memory clobber

2014-11-16 Thread aph at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 Andrew Haley aph at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at redhat dot

[Bug java/60667] Undefined behavior in Java FE

2014-03-26 Thread aph at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60667 Andrew Haley aph at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at redhat dot com

[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux

2010-04-13 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #37 from aph at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 17:02 --- Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux On 04/13/2010 05:52 PM, mikpe at it dot uu dot se wrote: Is it maybe the case that Compact model 1 unwinder data isn't yet being

[Bug java/40816] error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded

2010-01-23 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from aph at redhat dot com 2010-01-23 23:18 --- Subject: Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded On 01/22/2010 11:43 AM, mathieu dot malaterre at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #2 from mathieu dot malaterre at gmail dot com 2010-01-22 11

[Bug inline-asm/39847] 16 symbolic register names generates error: more than 30 operands in 'asm'

2009-04-22 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-22 17:33 --- Subject: Re: 16 symbolic register names generates error: more than 30 operands in 'asm' 0) I will build gcc-4.4 and try that. I will also make the 1 line patch to it to try increasing the number of asm params, and try

[Bug target/32340] [arm] libjava build failure due to missing thread synchronization primitives

2009-04-20 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-20 08:48 --- Subject: Re: [arm] libjava build failure due to missing thread synchronization primitives ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 05:58 --- The build

[Bug target/32340] [arm] libjava build failure due to missing thread synchronization primitives

2009-04-20 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-20 15:44 --- Subject: Re: [arm] libjava build failure due to missing thread synchronization primitives I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do. What did you change to support arm-eabi* ? I changed libjava/configure.host

[Bug libgcj/38396] [4.3 Regression] ecj1 linked against both -lgcj and -lgcj_bc

2009-04-04 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #27 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-04 21:13 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ecj1 linked against both -lgcj and -lgcj_bc dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote: Out of curiosity, how can a pr like this one be UNCONFIRMED? Insanity is the only explanation I can think

[Bug libgcj/5303] Undocumented java programs

2009-02-09 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #15 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-02-09 16:46 --- Subject: Re: Undocumented java programs mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-09 16:20 --- Would the Java maintainers accept a patch to remove

[Bug libgcj/38396] [4.4 Regression] libgcj_bc for 4.3 and 4.4 are binary incompatible but have the same SONAME

2008-12-10 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #18 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-12-10 13:46 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj_bc for 4.3 and 4.4 are binary incompatible but have the same SONAME jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 13:30

[Bug libgcj/38396] [4.4 Regression] libgcj_bc for 4.3 and 4.4 are binary incompatible but have the same SONAME

2008-12-10 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-12-10 12:46 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj_bc for 4.3 and 4.4 are binary incompatible but have the same SONAME rguenther at suse dot de wrote: Look at the exported symbols in the old version of libgcj_bc.so. Make sure

[Bug java/37068] [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected

2008-11-05 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #36 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-05 14:02 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de wrote: After rebuilding jc1 and rerunning the libjava testsuite on alpha-dec-osf5.1b

[Bug java/37068] [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected

2008-11-04 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #24 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 16:09 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected mark at codesourcery dot com wrote: You shouldn't call that function. Instead, you should set DECL_STATIC_{CONSTRUCTOR

[Bug java/37068] [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected

2008-11-04 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #27 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 18:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected dje dot gcc at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #25 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-11-04 18:11 --- Subject

[Bug java/37068] [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected

2008-11-04 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #31 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 23:06 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: --- Comment #30 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-04 19

[Bug java/37068] [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected

2008-11-03 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #18 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-03 15:12 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: --- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-03 15

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #8 from aph at redhat dot com 2006-02-23 13:38 --- Subject: Re: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly Rainer Emrich writes: The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv: LIBICONV which is LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 from aph at redhat dot com 2006-02-23 15:41 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly Rainer Emrich writes: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Haley schrieb: Rainer Emrich writes: The config.log in libjava has

[Bug bootstrap/20155] [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long

2005-08-08 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-08-08 17:03 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: Andrew, is a backport fine with you? Yes. Go for it. Andrew

[Bug java/22460] GCJ produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR (from byte-code)

2005-07-13 Thread aph at redhat dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22460

[Bug java/21428] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] bogus warning: unused parameter 'this'

2005-06-30 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-30 08:58 --- Ah, thanks. It was a causalty of a hard disk crash I had. I'll do it once 4.0 is thawed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21428

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 10:44 --- OK, I'm looking at it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 11:09 --- Failure during bootstrap: ./xgcc -B./ -B/home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/home

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 11:34 --- I think you want mark_stmt_necessary (stmt, true) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847

[Bug tree-optimization/21847] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompiling of the following java code

2005-06-06 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 13:15 --- With that change, passes bootstrap with c/c++/java, perfect i686-pc-linux-gnu libgcj test result. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847

[Bug java/17845] can't build GNU Classpath

2004-10-11 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2004-10-11 09:11 --- Subject: can't build GNU Classpath I think I'm going to have to give up on this bug. If I can't duplicate the problem myself and you can't duplicate the propblem on any machine to which I have access there's