[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Fri Aug 10 14:08:53 2018 New Revision: 263471 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263471=gcc=rev Log: 2018-08-10 Janus Weil PR fortran/57160 * invoke.texi

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-07/msg00086.html Don't abuse any optimization option.

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-07/msg00086.html

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #9) > As noted already somewhere in the discussion of PR85599 on the mailing list, > this breaks actual_pointer_function_1.f90 in the testsuite ... but apart from

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > It is not actually a complete duplicate of PR 85599, > > it is just similar. > > What is different? Is "different chunks of code are required" good

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > It is not actually a complete duplicate of PR 85599, > it is just similar. What is different? IMO the two PRs should be closed as WONTFIX.

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug fortran/57160] short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus