https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||54367
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #1)
> > i believe i've hit the same problem
>
> I don't think so. The original bug report is for 4.9.3, and seems to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #1)
> i believe i've hit the same problem
I don't think so. The original bug report is for 4.9.3, and seems to be an
actual compiler bug that is fixed already in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, the original report was for 4.9.1, but the bug is still present in 4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64329
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mstahl at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1