[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #16 from Milian Wolff --- So how can I silence the warning then for the case I pasted in the first comment: ~~~+ #include template struct foo {}; foo emit_unexpected_warning; int main() { return

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- As Jason explained it works as designed. But the warning is certainly confusing. It doesn't help that not all attributes enjoy this special treatment or that the manual doesn't explain it. At a minimum, I

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- > I imagine it was to support using them on function pointers. Yes, that is the reason why they apply to function types rather than decls.

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- GCC 6.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3 --- Comment #10 from Richard

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Milian Wolff from comment #8) > As an interested bystander, may I ask: If the attribute is part of the type, > shouldn't it then be transferred via decltype() and then also used in the >

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #8 from Milian Wolff --- As an interested bystander, may I ask: If the attribute is part of the type, shouldn't it then be transferred via decltype() and then also used in the template to trigger the warning there? To me, the example

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6) > I didn't know that GCC considers attribute warn_unused_result part of the > function type. When you say that most of these attributes apply to the > function

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- I didn't know that GCC considers attribute warn_unused_result part of the function type. When you say that most of these attributes apply to the function type, which others are you referring to? FWIW, I

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|