[Bug debug/113562] [14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c

2024-03-07 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113562 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug debug/113562] [14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c

2024-01-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113562 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Just to put it somewhere I ran dwlocstat on cc1plus before/after the > offending change and it looks almost the same. We go from > > cov%samples cumul >

[Bug debug/113562] [14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c

2024-01-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113562 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Just to put it somewhere I ran dwlocstat on cc1plus before/after the offending change and it looks almost the same. We go from cov%samples cumul 0..10 1280217/38% 1280217/38% 11..20 55668/1%

[Bug debug/113562] [14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c

2024-01-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113562 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- So the first difference is @@ -4076,36 +4076,47 @@ fbt (0x7700b468: (reg/f:SI 16 argp)) == (address:SI -4) fbt (0x771f6a68: (plus:SI (minus:SI (value/u/j:SI 13:4329 @0x4a213b0/0x498b 600)

[Bug debug/113562] [14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c

2024-01-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113562 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Last reconfirmed|