--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.3 |4.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42736
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 16:20 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Have posted a fix on the list today.
Latest patch by Paul (which has been approved):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-01/msg00134.html
I have filled PR 42831 regarding the missed
--- Comment #11 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-01-21 20:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Wrong-code with
allocatable or pointer components in elemental functions
Thanks, Tobias.
I am not sure that it is unnecessary - for that reason, I am
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 20:39 ---
Subject: Bug 42736
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jan 21 20:38:51 2010
New Revision: 156161
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156161
Log:
2010-01-21 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 09:54 ---
This PR has me somewhat flummoxed. I have changed the title to reflect the
fact that it does not matter if the component is allocatable or a pointer.
Also, a component reference of an allocatable array of derived
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 17:32 ---
Have posted a fix on the list today.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
