[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- Indeed it is.

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor --- I believe this is fixed but I still need to build an instrumented compiler to verify.

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 9 18:26:37 2017 New Revision: 244232 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244232=gcc=rev Log: [PR 78365] Prudent type handling in IPA VR-prop 2017-01-09 Martin Jambor

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #7) > I cannot reproduce this using the testcase from comment #1 even whe I add > -fsanitize=undefined to the command line. Is this on x86_64? You need to use

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Formatting-wise yes (though you could leave the parens around (parm_type == NULL) ), but I'm not familiar with this code to actually review it. Plus, patches should go to gcc-patches.

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40212 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40212=edit fix formatting of patch in comment 3 Oops, sorry about that. Fixed formatting in this version.

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40198 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40198=edit untested patch to check if type is integral or pointer type. Hi, Well, this seems to happen for

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Markus, Thanks for the report, I am able to reproduce it with ubsan-built gcc (--with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I am looking into it. Thanks,

[Bug ipa/78599] [7 Regression] hwint.h:292:72: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- markus@x4 ~ % cat bench.ii struct A { enum { __value }; }; template _OI __copy_move_a2(_II, _OI); template void copy(_II, _II, _OI p3) { __copy_move_a2(0, p3); }