https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I should add it there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #10 from Romain Geissler ---
Ok, I was not sure whether it was more important to have a given major branch
(ie all gcc 9 releases) consistent or favor compatibility with the biggest
number of gcc releases (cross branches). You
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Romain Geissler from comment #8)
> Sorry to jump back into this old bug, but isn't it a issue that this was
> backported to gcc 9 after some releases of gcc 9 were in the wild yet ?
Yes. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Nov 22 12:36:18 2019
New Revision: 278614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278614=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/92267 fix ABI change in deque iterators
Defaulting the copy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Seems to be due to r260380
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Preprocessing with GCC 8 and then compiling with GCC 9 doesn't crash, so it's
due to a change in libstdc++ headers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92267
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Status|UNCONFIRMED
10 matches
Mail list logo
