https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Apr 10 07:24:59 2018
New Revision: 259265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259265&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Be more carefull about DECL merging in LTO (PR lto/85248).
2018-04-10 Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43884
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43884&action=edit
Patch for GCC 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> I think we want to merge the cgraph nodes but _not_ merge decls (thus not
> call lto_symtab_prevail_decl). Iff that is supported somehow...? Probably
> we expec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
I think we want to merge the cgraph nodes but _not_ merge decls (thus not
call lto_symtab_prevail_decl). Iff that is supported somehow...? Probably
we expect the decl <-> cgraph node be a 1:1 relation, not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Unfortunately the test ICE for couple of MPX test-cases compiled with LTO (I
wish we had MPX already removed). So:
$ gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr66221_*.c -flto
-mmpx -fcheck-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect this is because error is marked as noreturn in the header file and
> not a gcc issue.
No, it's not. It's properly distinguished:
extern void __error_al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect this is because error is marked as noreturn in the header file and
not a gcc issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|
11 matches
Mail list logo
