[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3595231d9f5aec301422b152809b1322bdb525fe commit r13-854-g3595231d9f5aec301422b152809b1322bdb525fe Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Mon

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-30 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- > I think it would work to keep the constraints for > const_int_operands that are in a % pair and drop them > elsewhere. (So a partial reapplication, rather than a > full reapplication.) OK, let's throw the

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-30 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > I was afraid I don't understood the reason of the failure well, although it > happened very rarely (actually, no failures were detected during the

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-30 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5) > FWIW, I think the problem is specific to operands that are > commutative with a non-constant operand. For example, > suppose the pre-RA instruction had a

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-30 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-17 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61a6923e8917b6efcf349515a00a485dfd5b42e4 commit r13-563-g61a6923e8917b6efcf349515a00a485dfd5b42e4 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Tue

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-17 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com Ever

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-17 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Ho-hum - this was my patch that removed constraint from const_int predicates. We are talking about: (define_insn_and_split "*anddi_1_btr" [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rm")

[Bug target/105624] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)

2022-05-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0