https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, ancient issue is ancient:
Here it starts: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-07/msg01851.html
Still, I think Segher has a point in comment #4. Why not just enable all the
multilibs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2)
and a patch from somewhere else that seems related:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/plain/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5/sh4-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I configured for sh4-linux, foolishly thinking that sh4-nofpu would
work with that as well. Why not build all regular multilibs for
every regular config? Maybe keep sh5, sh2a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
At least for sh4, it would have a historical reason. In the old
time, -m4-nofpu confused many users (including me). From its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwamatsu at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #0)
Kaz, do you have any idea why these SUPPORT_SH* macros are needed? Why
isn't just every CPU/FPU type marked as supported?
I have no
