https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to amker from comment #6)
Since it works on gcc 3.4, so I consider this as a regression and applied
the patch. Should be fixed now.
Hi Vlad, could you please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Feb 13 05:44:46 2015
New Revision: 220676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220676root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64705
* tree-ssa-loop-niter.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Since it works on gcc 3.4, so I consider this as a regression and applied the
patch. Should be fixed now.
Hi Vlad, could you please help me verify that the original benchmark is fixed
too?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I had a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Loop dump before IVOPT is like below:
Loop 4, basic blocks 28/30;
bb 26:
count_54 = count_172 + 1;
_55 = i_161 + i_161;
prime_56 = _55 + 3;
k_57 = prime_56 + i_161;
if (size_26 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* |x86_64-*-*, aarch64
---
