https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
clyon at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
Unfortunately that patch breaks the build on x86 GNU/Linux. The problem is
that the split-stack support (the __morestack symbol) must be linked into the
shared library directly, not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64408
--- Comment #3 from Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
Fixed by:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00247.html
Fix confirmed with 4.9.2; thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #5)
Created attachment 34665 [details]
fix
Thanks for working on this. s/accross/across/. Please mail it to gcc-patches
once you test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
The attached test case fails for me with
with the same message:
g++: error: test.ii: -fcompare-debug failure (length)
That's with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
Bug ID: 64937
Summary: [5 Regression] compare debug failure with
-fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
Started with r220316.
Mine (comment 2) also fails with r220315 - but it is also a 5.0 regression.
Hence, I filled a new PR for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781
--- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #12)
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, tromey at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
E.g., firefox has a logging printf that accepts %hs to print char16_t*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34665
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34665action=edit
fix
The problem is that we jump thread twice across the loop latch:
first, from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62103
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Feb 4 08:22:45 2015
New Revision: 220390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220390root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-04 Thomas Preud'homme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #7 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Feb 4 09:24:56 2015
New Revision: 220392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220392root=gccview=rev
Log:
[PATCH][libstdc++][Testsuite] isctype test fails for newlib.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812
Timo Teräs timo.teras at iki dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timo.teras at iki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64932
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64932
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #30 from Eric Christopher echristo at gmail dot com ---
That might be reasonable. As far as I know ld64 doesn't do that yet, but I know
it's been thought about.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
--- Comment #18 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #17)
Vlad Jakub are in the best position to decide if this ought to be
backported.
I am agree with Jakub. I'd wait for 2 weeks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
*** Bug 64929 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64929
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
trippels@gcc2-power8 % cat wp512.i
int a[] = {}, b[] = {}, c[] = {}, d[] = {}, e[] = {}, f[] = {}, h[] = {};
int g[] = { 0 };
int i, l, s, w, x, y, z, t2, t3, t5;
unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #13)
I have been reconsidering the plugin approach given some new things
I learned about the details of the firefox code (namely that it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64907
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This is probably a duplicate of pr64849.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
AFAICT only the ChangeLogs have been committed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34666
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34666action=edit
Patch I am testing.
The following patch fixes the parameters, but I do not get any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jaydub66 at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
I got
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64882
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Feb 4 20:00:48 2015
New Revision: 220415
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220415root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-01-31 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34669
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34669action=edit
x.ii
Preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
Created attachment 34666 [details]
Patch I am testing.
The following patch fixes the parameters, but I do not get any
ubsan_unreachable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
If I have understood correctly, -fPIC is not supported on x86_64 and so,
unless I am mistaken, I cannot help you further.
This is not how I understand comment 1.
Note that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64257
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Feb 4 19:11:48 2015
New Revision: 220412
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220412root=gccview=rev
Log:
More fixes for update_web_docs_svn for jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64868
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Feb 4 19:35:17 2015
New Revision: 220414
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220414root=gccview=rev
Log:
Clear hard frame pointer alignment if not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64938
Bug ID: 64938
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in
symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:547 on
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
So, with the patch you've posted I get:
$ /usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/g++ -B /usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
I got
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory
reference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64938
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
couldn't find any approval email on gcc-patches for the backport. Was this
supposed to go to the gcc-4.9 google branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, with the patch you've posted I get:
$ /usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/g++ -B /usr/src/gcc/obj/gcc/
`/usr/src/gcc/obj/x86_*/libstdc++-v3/scripts/testsuite_flags --build-includes`
-E -o x.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64477
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64939
Bug ID: 64939
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2202
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hm, considering the recently-applied patch at r220392, why does my autotester
still see these fail at r220396?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, the devirtualization I see is for
_Z3getI10Code_BlockEbR2CSRKSsPT_.part.3.constprop.7
when it is inlined to
_ZN4FileC2ERKSs
outer type of original context is:
$6 = {offset =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64939
--- Comment #1 from Ken Brown kbrow1i at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34670
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34670action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64882
--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Feb 4 21:46:01 2015
New Revision: 220418
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220418root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-01-31 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34671
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34671action=edit
Patch I am testing
OK, the problem is that we first speculatively devirtualize to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64882
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Feb 4 20:28:49 2015
New Revision: 220417
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220417root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64922
* gimple.c: Include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53637
marc at kdab dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc at kdab dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64817
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Feb 4 14:23:47 2015
New Revision: 220405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220405root=gccview=rev
Log:
Simplify XOR of (AND or IOR) of XOR.
for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64817
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Feb 4 14:23:33 2015
New Revision: 220404
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220404root=gccview=rev
Log:
Avoid allocating memory when trying but failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64936
Bug ID: 64936
Summary: regex, ECMA treated as posix
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
Normally libgo.so will get the symbol _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData from
libgcc_s.so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Feb 5 03:57:32 2015
New Revision: 220432
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220432root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/61548
* varpool.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Feb 5 04:01:25 2015
New Revision: 220433
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220433root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/61548
* ipa.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64868
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53637
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64938
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: doko
Date: Wed Feb 4 23:36:22 2015
New Revision: 220426
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220426root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-04 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64940
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64938
--- Comment #3 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Thu Feb 5 00:27:54 2015
New Revision: 220431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220431root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from gcc-4_9-branch.
2015-02-04 Matthias Klose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64559
--- Comment #6 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Thu Feb 5 00:27:54 2015
New Revision: 220431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220431root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from gcc-4_9-branch.
2015-02-04 Matthias Klose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64940
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You can call fix-includes after installing the toolchain if needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, an RTL expansion issue. We optimize m_fn2 as
B D::m_fn2() const (const struct D * const this)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64256
--- Comment #7 from Zoltan Hidvegi zoltan at hidvegi dot com ---
With the above trivial change I've been able to build code with long
stabstrings on AIX 6.1. I was using the gcc-4.8 branch since that's what we are
using here. If you fix this,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 4 22:32:36 2015
New Revision: 220420
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220420root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/64824
PR c/64868
gcc/c/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64686
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is an ordering issue. We are adding edges to heap and resolving speculations
at once that means that we have temporarily wrong summaries. I am testing the
following that should not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64940
--- Comment #2 from Bill Torpey bill.torpey at ullink dot com ---
Thanks for the quick reply!
Unfortunately, the approach you suggest won't work for what we want to do,
which is to have a *single* network-mounted gcc that can be used from both.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
marc at kdab dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc at kdab dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64824
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64123
--- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Feb 4 23:26:40 2015
New Revision: 220424
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220424root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR gcov/64123
* gcov-io.c (gcov_var):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64559
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: doko
Date: Wed Feb 4 23:36:22 2015
New Revision: 220426
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220426root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-04 Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34673
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34673action=edit
Proposed fix
Ok, there seems to be 3 issues ;) First is that emutls does not resolve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64686
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Feb 5 00:16:11 2015
New Revision: 220429
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220429root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/64686
* ipa-inline.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
--- Comment #12 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Thu Feb 5 00:27:54 2015
New Revision: 220431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220431root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from gcc-4_9-branch.
2015-02-04 Matthias Klose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64256
--- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for the patch, Zoltan, but the patch is not the challenge. It is not
difficult to instruct GCC to generate stabs with continuation. The question
always has been if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64942
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64705
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I had a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #33 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #32)
So I take the other way around by passing the IV's ssa_name into
scev_probably_wraps_p along call sequence
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The cost of expression p + ((sizetype)(99 - i_6(D)) + 1) * 4 computed
using normal +/-/* operators on sparc64 is 18, but the cost is 32 if it is
computed as p +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Hans de Goede jwrdegoede at fedoraproject dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64407
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Perhaps you can emit another symbol covering the original size plus padding in
that case on targets where linker can do something so problematic.
So you'd end up having e.g. symbol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64408
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nickc
Date: Wed Feb 4 13:42:26 2015
New Revision: 220400
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220400root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64408
* config/fr30/predicates.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64408
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64817
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Feb 4 14:24:00 2015
New Revision: 220406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220406root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix signedness of compares expanding debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64934
Bug ID: 64934
Summary: The french text of --version is not proper french
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
Bug ID: 64935
Summary: [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building
of Linux kernel
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This looks a generic problem in get_shiftadd_cost to me, it ought to mimic the
algorithms in expmed.c, something like:
@@ -3597,22 +3597,26 @@ get_shiftadd_cost (tree expr,
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
